Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
| Group | Value (score on scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -11.2 | 8.29 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -7.69 | 7.61 |
Trial · Interventional
TerminatedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataThis trial was stopped early.
Reason given at the registry: Poor recruitment due to rare targeted population
Results were posted for this trial.
Germany, Spain, United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results
Symptomatic Study Investigating Degarelix in Patients Suffering From Prostate Cancer
NCT00831233Apr 2009 to Jul 2010
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this trial was to see how well a new trial drug (degarelix) worked on lower urinary tract symptoms (also known as LUTS) in prostate cancer patients as compared to how a standard drug hormonal treatment worked on the same symptoms. The advancement/worsening of prostate cancer may be associated with LUTS and the symptoms may impact the ability to urinate normally and thereby the quality of life for these patients. Patients were randomly selected (like flipping a coin) to receive either degarelix or standard hormone therapy (combination of goserelin and bicalutamide) for a 3 month treatment period. During this period the relief of urinary symptoms was evaluated via a questionnaire filled in by patients and addressing the severity and frequency of their symptoms.
Experimental
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg
Degarelix 240 mg (40 mg/mL) + 80 mg (20 mg/mL)
Active comparator
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
Time frame · After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.
Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8
Time frame · After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.
Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the maximum urine flow (Qmax; mL/sec)
Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the residual volume (Vresidual; mL)
Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12
Time frame · After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline
TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.
Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS questionnaire included an additional single question to assess the participant's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms. The question was: 'If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition the way it is now, how would you feel about that?' The possible answers to this question ranged from 'delighted' (a score of '0') to 'terrible' (a score of '6'). The figures in the tables present the change (ie decrease) in IPSS QoL score, i.e. the bigger the decrease the better QoL.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least on participant with one abnormal value are presented, many more variables were included in the trial.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (score on scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -11.2 | 8.29 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -7.69 | 7.61 |
| Group | Value (score on scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -7.31 | 5.83 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -4.62 | 5.49 |
| Group | Value (mL/sec) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | 3.63 | 7.82 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | 3.55 | 3.80 |
| Group | Value (mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -36.2 | 148 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -19.8 | 63.5 |
| Group | Value (mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -22.4 | 14.8 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -13.4 | 10.0 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | 26 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | 12 |
| Group | Value (percentage) |
|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -85.72 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -93.44 |
| Group | Value (score on scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -0.96 | 0.92 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -0.54 | 1.51 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mgDegarelix 240 mg (40 mg/mL) + 80 mg (20 mg/mL) | – | 0 / 27 | 14 / 27 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg) | – | 1 / 13 | 7 / 13 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Anderson et al. 2013Urologia internationaliscited by 42
PMID 23258223DOI 10.1159/000345423PUB-23258223
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated