Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

TerminatedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Symptomatic Study Investigating Degarelix in Patients Suffering From Prostate Cancer

NCTNCT00831233 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idFE200486 CS28Other id2008-004338-26Other id2008

Overview

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Ferring Pharmaceuticals · Industry
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
3 countries

Germany, Spain, United Kingdom

Start
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jul 2010
First posted
28 Jan 2009 (estimated)
Last update posted
11 Nov 2013 (estimated)
Conditions
Prostate Cancer

Timeline

1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
200920102011
  1. Ph 3

    Symptomatic Study Investigating Degarelix in Patients Suffering From Prostate Cancer

    NCT00831233

    Apr 2009 to Jul 2010

    Terminated

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The purpose of this trial was to see how well a new trial drug (degarelix) worked on lower urinary tract symptoms (also known as LUTS) in prostate cancer patients as compared to how a standard drug hormonal treatment worked on the same symptoms. The advancement/worsening of prostate cancer may be associated with LUTS and the symptoms may impact the ability to urinate normally and thereby the quality of life for these patients. Patients were randomly selected (like flipping a coin) to receive either degarelix or standard hormone therapy (combination of goserelin and bicalutamide) for a 3 month treatment period. During this period the relief of urinary symptoms was evaluated via a questionnaire filled in by patients and addressing the severity and frequency of their symptoms.

Interventions

  • DegarelixDrug
  • GoserelinDrug
  • BicalutamideDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg

    Degarelix 240 mg (40 mg/mL) + 80 mg (20 mg/mL)

  • Active comparator

    Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)

    Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

    Time frame · After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.

Secondary outcomes(9)
  1. Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8

    Time frame · After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.

  2. Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit

    Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the maximum urine flow (Qmax; mL/sec)

  3. Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit

    Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the residual volume (Vresidual; mL)

  4. Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12

    Time frame · After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.

  5. Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit

    Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

  6. Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit

    Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

  7. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit

    Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

    Registry description

    The IPSS questionnaire included an additional single question to assess the participant's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms. The question was: 'If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition the way it is now, how would you feel about that?' The possible answers to this question ranged from 'delighted' (a score of '0') to 'terrible' (a score of '6'). The figures in the tables present the change (ie decrease) in IPSS QoL score, i.e. the bigger the decrease the better QoL.

  8. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

    Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

    Registry description

    This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value.

  9. Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

    Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

    Registry description

    The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least on participant with one abnormal value are presented, many more variables were included in the trial.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMean· After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

GroupValue (score on scale)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-11.28.29
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-7.697.61
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeMean· After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8

GroupValue (score on scale)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-7.315.83
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.625.49
Secondary outcomeMean· After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit

GroupValue (mL/sec)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3.637.82
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)3.553.80
Secondary outcomeMean· After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit

GroupValue (mL)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.2148
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-19.863.5
Secondary outcomeMean· After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12

GroupValue (mL)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-22.414.8
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-13.410.0
Secondary outcomeNumber· After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit

GroupValue (participants)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg26
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)12
Secondary outcomeMedian· After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit

GroupValue (percentage)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-85.72
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-93.44
Secondary outcomeMean· After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit

GroupValue (score on scale)Spread
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.960.92
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-0.541.51

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mgDegarelix 240 mg (40 mg/mL) + 80 mg (20 mg/mL)–0 / 2714 / 27
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)–1 / 137 / 13

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies1

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013

6 results

Degarelix versus goserelin (+ antiandrogen flare protection) in the relief of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate cancer: results from a phase IIIb study (NCT00831233).

Anderson et al. 2013Urologia internationaliscited by 42

PMID 23258223DOI 10.1159/000345423PUB-23258223

Full text at the publisher6 results

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • DerivedZengerling F, Jakob JJ, Schmidt S, Meerpohl JJ, Blumle A, Schmucker C, Mayer B, Kunath F. Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 5;8(8):CD012548. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012548.pub2. PMID 34350976

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
Male
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient has given written informed consent before any trial-related activity is performed * Has a confirmed prostate cancer in which this type of treatment is needed. Exclusion Criteria: * Previous treatment for prostate cancer * Previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate * Current use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitor or α-adrenoceptor antagonist. * Patients in need of external beam radiotherapy to be started at the same time as hormone therapy * Certain risk factors for abnormal heart rhythms/QT prolongation (corrected QT interval over 450 msec., Torsades de Pointes or use of certain medications with potential risk) * History of severe untreated asthma, anaphylactic reactions, or severe urticaria and/or angioedema. * Hypersensitivity towards any component of the investigational product * Other previous cancers within the last five years with the exception of prostate cancer and some types of skin cancer. * Clinical disorders other than prostate cancer including but not limited to renal, haematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, cardiac, neurological, psychiatric disease, alcohol or drug abuse or other conditionals as judged by the investigator.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.