Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 4Results postedRegistry data

Study to Assess the Efficacy of an Extended Injection Interval Schedule of Lanreotide Autogel in Acromegalic Subjects

Short name LEAD

NCTNCT00701363 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idA-38-52030-214Other id2007-005838-37

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Enrollment
124 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Ipsen · Industry
Design
Allocation not applicable · Open label (no masking)
Countries
14 countries

Brazil, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Korea, Sweden

Start
Oct 2008
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
May 2013
First posted
19 Jun 2008 (estimated)
Last update posted
29 Jan 2019
Conditions
Acromegaly

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
2008200920102011201220132014
  1. Ph 4

    LEAD

    NCT00701363

    Oct 2008 to May 2013

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of an extended injection interval schedule of lanreotide Autogel 120 mg in acromegalic subjects who are biochemically controlled on long term treatment with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg

Interventions

  • Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgDrug

Arms1

  • Experimental

    Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Percentage of Subjects Having Maintained Their Injection Interval Schedule of Six Weeks or Increased Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks Whilst Keeping Their Normalised Insulin Growth Factor (IGF-1) Levels (Age and Sex Adjusted)

    Time frame · At week 48 (End of Study)

    Registry description

    A subject was responder if he maintained his injection interval schedule of 6 weeks or increased his injection interval to eight weeks whilst keeping his normalised IGF-1 level (age and sex adjusted) at the end of the study (Week 48)

Secondary outcomes(14)
  1. Percentage of Subjects With Normalised IGF-1 Levels (Age and Sex Adjusted)

    Time frame · At week 24

    Registry description

    The criterion for a subject is satisfied if he has a normalised IGF-1 level (age and sex adjusted) at week 24.

  2. Percentage of Subjects Having Maintained an Injection Interval of Six Weeks or Increasing Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks

    Time frame · During phase 2 of the study (up to week 48)

    Registry description

    The criterion for a subject is satisfied if he maintained an injection interval of six weeks or increasing his injection interval to eight weeks during Phase 2 of the study.

  3. Percentage of Subjects Who Extend Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks During Phase 2 of the Study, Whilst Maintaining Normalised IGF-1 Levels

    Time frame · At week 48

    Registry description

    The criterion for a subject is satisfied if he extended his injection interval to eight weeks during Phase 2 of the study, whilst maintaining normalised IGF-1 levels at Week 48.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in IGF-1 Values [Expressed as % of Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)], Overall and by Injection Interval

    Time frame · Baseline (visit 1) and week 48

    Registry description

    IGF-1 change from Baseline to Week 48 = Mean IGF-1 level at Week 48 - Mean IGF-1 level at Baseline

  5. Treatment Group (A, B or C) Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in Subjects Who Maintained Normalised IGF-1 Values at Week 48. Comparisons Will be Made as Follows: A Versus B, A Versus C, A Versus (B+C) and B Versus C

    Time frame · Baseline (visit 1)

  6. Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in All Groups (A, B and C) Versus Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in Subjects With Uncontrolled IGF-1 Levels at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline (visit 1)

  7. Symptoms of Acromegaly (Headache, Excessive Perspiration, Fatigue, Soft Tissue Swelling and Arthralgia)

    Time frame · At baseline, week 24 and week 48

    Registry description

    Acromegaly symptoms were assessed by the patients using the Patient Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) scale ranging from 0 (No symptoms) to 8 (Severe, incapacitating symptoms).

  8. Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life Scores (AcroQoL)

    Time frame · At weeks 24 and 48

    Registry description

    AcroQoL score groups 22 components: Eight physical, Seven psychological appearance and Seven psychological personal relations, adjusted to a scale of 100, where a score of 100 corresponds to the best possible QoL and 0 to the worst.

  9. Mean Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life Scores (SF-36)

    Time frame · At weeks 24 and 48

    Registry description

    Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36) score comprises eight components: Physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health on a scale of 100, where a score of 100 corresponds to the best possible QoL and 0 to the worst.

  10. Percentage of Subjects With Normalized IGF-1 Levels (Age and Sex Adjusted), Without Any Worsening of the AcroQoL Change Score Between Inclusion and Week 48

    Time frame · At week 48 (End of Study)

    Registry description

    The criterion for a subject is satisfied if he had a IGF-1 level (age and sex adjusted) without any worsening of the AcroQoL change score between Inclusion and Week 48.

  11. Correlation Between the Changes From Baseline in Quality of Life (AcroQoL) With the Corresponding Changes in IGF-1 Level (Expressed as % of ULN) at Each Visit

    Time frame · At weeks 24 and 48

    Registry description

    AcroQoL change from Baseline to Week 24 (48) = AcroQoL at Week 24 (48) - AcroQoL at Baseline. IGF-1 change from Baseline to Week 24 (48) = IGF-1 at Week 24 (48) - IGF-1 at Baseline. Correlation presented is a Spearman correlation (non parametric).

  12. Serum Growth Hormone (GH) Levels

    Time frame · At Baseline, week 24 and week 48

  13. Percentage of Subjects With GH Level Less Than or Equal to 2.5 ng/mL

    Time frame · At weeks 24 and 48

  14. Subject Treatment Schedule Preference

    Time frame · At weeks 24 and 48

    Registry description

    At week 24, the preference assessed between Octreotide Long Acting Repeatable intramuscular injection (Oct-LAR IM) every 4 weeks and Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg subcutaneous injection (SC) every 6 weeks. At week 48, the preference is assessed between Oct-LAR IM every 4 weeks and Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg SC either injected every 4, 6 or 8 weeks (as injected during Phase II of the study).

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeNumber· At week 48 (End of Study)

Percentage of Subjects Having Maintained Their Injection Interval Schedule of Six Weeks or Increased Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks Whilst Keeping Their Normalised Insulin Growth Factor (IGF-1) Levels (Age and Sex Adjusted)

GroupValue (Percentage of subjects)
Overall Study75.8
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeNumber· At week 24

Percentage of Subjects With Normalised IGF-1 Levels (Age and Sex Adjusted)

GroupValue (Percentage of subjects)
Overall Study88.7
Secondary outcomeNumber· During phase 2 of the study (up to week 48)

Percentage of Subjects Having Maintained an Injection Interval of Six Weeks or Increasing Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks

GroupValue (Percentage of subjects)
Overall Study78.2
Secondary outcomeNumber· At week 48

Percentage of Subjects Who Extend Their Injection Interval to Eight Weeks During Phase 2 of the Study, Whilst Maintaining Normalised IGF-1 Levels

GroupValue (Percentage of subjects)
Overall Study20.2
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline (visit 1) and week 48

Mean Change From Baseline in IGF-1 Values [Expressed as % of Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)], Overall and by Injection Interval

GroupValue (Percentage of ULN)Spread
Phase 2 (Group A): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.7018.55
Phase 2 (Group B): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 6 Weeks5.7430.48
Phase 2 (Group C): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 8 Weeks-4.3328.14
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline (visit 1)

Treatment Group (A, B or C) Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in Subjects Who Maintained Normalised IGF-1 Values at Week 48. Comparisons Will be Made as Follows: A Versus B, A Versus C, A Versus (B+C) and B Versus C

GroupValue (Percentage of ULN)
Phase 2 (Group A): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 4 Weeks98.69
Phase 2 (Group B): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 6 Weeks67.75
Phase 2 (Group C): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 8 Weeks51.30
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline (visit 1)

Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in All Groups (A, B and C) Versus Mean Baseline IGF-1 Levels (Expressed as % of ULN) in Subjects With Uncontrolled IGF-1 Levels at Week 24

GroupValue (Percentage of ULN)
Overall Study95.92
Secondary outcomeMean· At baseline, week 24 and week 48

Symptoms of Acromegaly (Headache, Excessive Perspiration, Fatigue, Soft Tissue Swelling and Arthralgia)

GroupValue (Units on a scale)Spread
Phase 1 Only: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg2.732.71
Phase 2 (Group A): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 4 Weeks2.151.72
Phase 2 (Group B): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 6 Weeks1.801.73
Phase 2 (Group C): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 8 Weeks2.042.11

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Phase 1: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgSubjects in phase 1 received 5 injections of Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg subcutaneously (SC) at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24. Baseline and week 24 injections were administered in the investigational centre, whereas the patient could receive weeks 6, 12 and 18 injections at home as part of the subject's normal medical care, completing details of the injection in the diary cards provided.–3 / 1512 / 15
Phase 2 (Group A): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 4 WeeksSubjects with IGF-1 levels \>100% to ≤130% of ULN at week 24 were assigned to group A. These subjects received 5 injections of Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at 4-week intervals from week 24 up to week 48.–2 / 1310 / 13
Phase 2 (Group B): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 6 WeeksSubjects with IGF-1 levels \>50% to ≤100% of ULN at week 24 were assigned to group B. These subjects received 3 injections of Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at 6-week intervals from week 24 up to week 48.–4 / 7048 / 70
Phase 2 (Group C): Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg Every 8 WeeksSubjects with IGF-1 levels ≤50% of ULN at week 24 were assigned to group C. These subjects received 2 injections of Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at 8-week intervals from week 24 up to week 48.–2 / 2620 / 26

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies0

Studies that cite this trial.

No study cites this trial.

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * The subject has given written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures * The subject is male or female and is over 18 years of age * The subject must have had documentation supporting the diagnosis of acromegaly, based on elevated IGF-1 and/or GH levels * The subject has been receiving octreotide LAR (10 or 20 mg) treatment for at least six months and is biochemically controlled. Control is defined as normal (age and sex adjusted) IGF 1 levels for two consecutive measurements (at least two months apart) preceding study entry * If the subject is receiving dopamine agonist therapy, treatment should be stable for at least four months, and no change in their dopamine-agonist medication is expected during the entire study period Exclusion Criteria: * The subject has received radiation therapy to the pituitary gland before study entry * The subject has a history of hypersensitivity to lanreotide or drugs with a similar chemical structure * The subject has received a growth hormone receptor antagonist (pegvisomant) therapy within three months before study entry * The subject has undergone treatment with any other investigational drug in the 30 days before study entry or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug, other than lanreotide 120 mg, during the course of the study * The subject has received any unlicensed drug within the 30 days prior to the baseline visit or is scheduled to receive an unlicensed drug during the course of the study

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.