Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 120 · 2026

9 results

Short- and long-term effects of semaglutide 2.4 mg on energy intake, appetite, and food reward: a 60-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Tronieri JS, Allison KC, DeRouen K, Amaro A, Collins KG, Roy A, Watts S, Ananna T, Wadden TA

The American journal of clinical nutrition20 Jun 2026

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced ad libitum energy intake from baseline by 291.9 kcal more than placebo at week 20.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, people on semaglutide ate fewer calories at a test lunch than people on placebo at week 20.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAd libitum energy intake change at week 20
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Energy intake difference
    −291.9 kcal
    week 20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The semaglutide group had significantly larger reductions from baseline in ad libitum energy intake relative to placebo at weeks 20, 40, and 60, consuming a mean ± standard error of 291.9 ± 64.4, 240.2 ± 87.8, and 269.5 ± 83.6 kcal less, respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced ad libitum energy intake from baseline by 240.2 kcal more than placebo at week 40.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, people on semaglutide ate fewer calories at a test lunch than people on placebo at week 40.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAd libitum energy intake change at week 40
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Energy intake difference
    −240.2 kcal
    week 40

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The semaglutide group had significantly larger reductions from baseline in ad libitum energy intake relative to placebo at weeks 20, 40, and 60, consuming a mean ± standard error of 291.9 ± 64.4, 240.2 ± 87.8, and 269.5 ± 83.6 kcal less, respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced ad libitum energy intake from baseline by 269.5 kcal more than placebo at week 60.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, people on semaglutide ate fewer calories at a test lunch than people on placebo at week 60.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAd libitum energy intake change at week 60
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Energy intake difference
    −269.5 kcal
    week 60

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The semaglutide group had significantly larger reductions from baseline in ad libitum energy intake relative to placebo at weeks 20, 40, and 60, consuming a mean ± standard error of 291.9 ± 64.4, 240.2 ± 87.8, and 269.5 ± 83.6 kcal less, respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    At week 20, semaglutide-treated adults had greater increases from baseline in appetite suppression after a standardized breakfast than placebo (MD = 2197 ± 823).

    In plain wordsAt week 20, adults on semaglutide felt less hungry after breakfast than adults on placebo.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAppetite suppression after standardized breakfast at week 20
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean difference
    2197 NA
    appetite suppression week 20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 20, semaglutide-treated participants had significantly greater increases from baseline in appetite suppression after the standardized breakfast [mean difference (MD) = 2197 ± 823] and greater reductions in past-week hunger (MD = -17.4 ± 4.8) and food preoccupation (MD = -14.9 ± 4.5).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    At week 20, semaglutide-treated adults had greater reductions in past-week hunger than placebo (MD = -17.4 ± 4.8).

    In plain wordsAt week 20, adults on semaglutide reported less hunger over the past week than adults on placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreasePast-week hunger at week 20
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean difference
    −17.4 NA
    past-week hunger week 20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 20, semaglutide-treated participants had significantly greater increases from baseline in appetite suppression after the standardized breakfast [mean difference (MD) = 2197 ± 823] and greater reductions in past-week hunger (MD = -17.4 ± 4.8) and food preoccupation (MD = -14.9 ± 4.5).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    At week 20, semaglutide-treated adults had greater reductions in food preoccupation than placebo (MD = -14.9 ± 4.5).

    In plain wordsAt week 20, adults on semaglutide thought about food less than adults on placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFood preoccupation at week 20
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean difference
    −14.9 NA
    food preoccupation week 20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 20, semaglutide-treated participants had significantly greater increases from baseline in appetite suppression after the standardized breakfast [mean difference (MD) = 2197 ± 823] and greater reductions in past-week hunger (MD = -17.4 ± 4.8) and food preoccupation (MD = -14.9 ± 4.5).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    The semaglutide and placebo groups did not differ significantly in appetite outcomes at weeks 40 or 60.

    In plain wordsBy weeks 40 and 60, appetite ratings were not significantly different between semaglutide and placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAppetite outcomes at weeks 40 and 60
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    However, the groups did not differ significantly in appetite outcomes at weeks 40 or 60.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Semaglutide produced a greater reduction than placebo in responsiveness to the rewarding value of food at week 20 (MD = -0.4 ± 0.2).

    In plain wordsAt week 20, adults on semaglutide were less drawn to the rewarding side of food than adults on placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseResponsiveness to food reward at week 20
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean difference
    −0.4 NA
    food reward week 20

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The semaglutide group had greater reductions in responsiveness to the rewarding value of food at weeks 20 and 40 (MD = -0.4 ± 0.2 and -0.6 ± 0.2, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    Semaglutide produced a greater reduction than placebo in responsiveness to the rewarding value of food at week 40 (MD = -0.6 ± 0.2).

    In plain wordsAt week 40, adults on semaglutide were less drawn to the rewarding side of food than adults on placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseResponsiveness to food reward at week 40
    Study

    n = 120

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg · 60 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean difference
    −0.6 NA
    food reward week 40

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The semaglutide group had greater reductions in responsiveness to the rewarding value of food at weeks 20 and 40 (MD = -0.4 ± 0.2 and -0.6 ± 0.2, respectively).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This 60-wk, double-blind trial randomly assigned 120 adults with overweight/obesity in a 3:2 ratio to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4Results postedNCT05548647

Semaglutide Treatment, Appetite, and Eating Behavior: Long-term Effects

University of Pennsylvanian = 12026 Jul 2022 to 12 May 2025

Obesity

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.