Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 962 · 2026

10 results

Orforglipron compared with dapagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control with metformin (ACHIEVE-2): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Welch M, Forst T, Jia W, Del Pino PO, Denning M, Wu WS, Li J, Liu R, Eifu M, Chen Y

Lancet (London, England)8 Jun 2026Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2DM using metformin, orforglipron 3 mg reduced HbA1c more than dapagliflozin and met non-inferiority criteria.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes using metformin, orforglipron 3 mg lowered HbA1c more than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change from baseline
    −1.23%
    orforglipron 3 mg, week 40
    HbA1c change from baseline
    −0.81%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40
    Estimated treatment difference in HbA1c vs dapagliflozin
    −0.42%
    orforglipron 3 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.08%
    orforglipron 3 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.07%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    95% confidence interval for estimated treatment difference in HbA1c
    −0.62 to −0.23%
    orforglipron 3 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    p value for HbA1c treatment difference
    < 0.0001
    orforglipron 3 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Change from baseline in mean HbA1c was -1·23% (SE 0·08), -1·50% (0·08), and -1·56% (0·09) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively, versus -0·81% (0·07) with dapagliflozin 10 mg;
    Summary
    estimated treatment difference versus dapagliflozin was -0·42% (95% CI -0·62 to -0·23), -0·70% (-0·90 to -0·49), and -0·75% (-0·96 to -0·55) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively (all p<0·0001)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    At week 40, for the treatment regimen estimand, all orforglipron doses were non-inferior to dapagliflozin in reducing HbA1c.
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2DM using metformin, orforglipron 12 mg reduced HbA1c more than dapagliflozin and met non-inferiority criteria.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes using metformin, orforglipron 12 mg lowered HbA1c more than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change from baseline
    −1.5%
    orforglipron 12 mg, week 40
    HbA1c change from baseline
    −0.81%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40
    Estimated treatment difference in HbA1c vs dapagliflozin
    −0.7%
    orforglipron 12 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.08%
    orforglipron 12 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.07%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    95% confidence interval for estimated treatment difference in HbA1c
    −0.9 to −0.49%
    orforglipron 12 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    p value for HbA1c treatment difference
    < 0.0001
    orforglipron 12 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Change from baseline in mean HbA1c was -1·23% (SE 0·08), -1·50% (0·08), and -1·56% (0·09) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively, versus -0·81% (0·07) with dapagliflozin 10 mg;
    Summary
    estimated treatment difference versus dapagliflozin was -0·42% (95% CI -0·62 to -0·23), -0·70% (-0·90 to -0·49), and -0·75% (-0·96 to -0·55) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively (all p<0·0001)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    At week 40, for the treatment regimen estimand, all orforglipron doses were non-inferior to dapagliflozin in reducing HbA1c.
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2DM using metformin, orforglipron 36 mg reduced HbA1c more than dapagliflozin and met non-inferiority criteria.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes using metformin, orforglipron 36 mg lowered HbA1c more than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    36 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change from baseline
    −1.56%
    orforglipron 36 mg, week 40
    HbA1c change from baseline
    −0.81%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40
    Estimated treatment difference in HbA1c vs dapagliflozin
    −0.75%
    orforglipron 36 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.09%
    orforglipron 36 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    Standard error of mean HbA1c change from baseline
    0.07%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    95% confidence interval for estimated treatment difference in HbA1c
    −0.96 to −0.55%
    orforglipron 36 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand
    p value for HbA1c treatment difference
    < 0.0001
    orforglipron 36 mg vs dapagliflozin 10 mg, week 40, treatment regimen estimand

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Change from baseline in mean HbA1c was -1·23% (SE 0·08), -1·50% (0·08), and -1·56% (0·09) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively, versus -0·81% (0·07) with dapagliflozin 10 mg;
    Summary
    estimated treatment difference versus dapagliflozin was -0·42% (95% CI -0·62 to -0·23), -0·70% (-0·90 to -0·49), and -0·75% (-0·96 to -0·55) with orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, and 36 mg, respectively (all p<0·0001)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    At week 40, for the treatment regimen estimand, all orforglipron doses were non-inferior to dapagliflozin in reducing HbA1c.
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, no severe hypoglycaemia episode was reported during the orforglipron versus dapagliflozin trial.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, no severe low blood sugar episode was reported in the orforglipron versus dapagliflozin trial.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSevere hypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 962

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No severe episode of hypoglycaemia was reported.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, gastrointestinal events occurred in 47% with orforglipron 3 mg versus 12% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, orforglipron 3 mg had more gut-related events than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    3 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    47%
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    112 participants
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    12%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    29 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    240 participants
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most frequent adverse events associated with orforglipron were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events, observed in 112 (47%) of 240 participants receiving orforglipron 3 mg, 112 (46%) of 241 receiving 12 mg, and 130 (54%) of 241 receiving 36 mg, versus 29 (12%) of 240 receiving dapagliflozin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, gastrointestinal events occurred in 46% with orforglipron 12 mg versus 12% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, orforglipron 12 mg had more gut-related events than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    12 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    46%
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    112 participants
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    12%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    29 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    241 participants
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most frequent adverse events associated with orforglipron were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events, observed in 112 (47%) of 240 participants receiving orforglipron 3 mg, 112 (46%) of 241 receiving 12 mg, and 130 (54%) of 241 receiving 36 mg, versus 29 (12%) of 240 receiving dapagliflozin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, gastrointestinal events occurred in 54% with orforglipron 36 mg versus 12% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, orforglipron 36 mg had more gut-related events than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    36 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    54%
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    130 participants
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    12%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with gastrointestinal adverse events
    29 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    241 participants
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participant denominator for gastrointestinal adverse events
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most frequent adverse events associated with orforglipron were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events, observed in 112 (47%) of 240 participants receiving orforglipron 3 mg, 112 (46%) of 241 receiving 12 mg, and 130 (54%) of 241 receiving 36 mg, versus 29 (12%) of 240 receiving dapagliflozin.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, discontinuations occurred in 15% with orforglipron 3 mg versus 6% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, more discontinued orforglipron 3 mg than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIntervention discontinuation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    3 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    15%
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    35 participants
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    6%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    14 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    240 participants
    orforglipron 3 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More study intervention discontinuations were observed with orforglipron 3 mg (35 [15%] of 240), 12 mg (44 [18%] of 241), and 36 mg (47 [20%] of 241) than with dapagliflozin (14 [6%] of 240).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, discontinuations occurred in 18% with orforglipron 12 mg versus 6% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, more discontinued orforglipron 12 mg than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIntervention discontinuation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    12 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    18%
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    44 participants
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    6%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    14 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    241 participants
    orforglipron 12 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More study intervention discontinuations were observed with orforglipron 3 mg (35 [15%] of 240), 12 mg (44 [18%] of 241), and 36 mg (47 [20%] of 241) than with dapagliflozin (14 [6%] of 240).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with T2DM, discontinuations occurred in 20% with orforglipron 36 mg versus 6% with dapagliflozin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, more discontinued orforglipron 36 mg than dapagliflozin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIntervention discontinuation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    36 mg once daily · oral · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    20%
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    47 participants
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    6%
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participants with study intervention discontinuation
    14 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    241 participants
    orforglipron 36 mg
    Participant denominator for study intervention discontinuation
    240 participants
    dapagliflozin 10 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    More study intervention discontinuations were observed with orforglipron 3 mg (35 [15%] of 240), 12 mg (44 [18%] of 241), and 36 mg (47 [20%] of 241) than with dapagliflozin (14 [6%] of 240).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This 40-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label (orforglipron dose-blinded), randomised study was conducted in 73 sites across six countries.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily oral orforglipron (3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg) or dapagliflozin 10 mg.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3NCT06192108

A Study of Orforglipron (LY3502970) Compared With Dapagliflozin in Adult Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control With Metformin

Eli Lilly and Companyn = 96210 Jan 2024 to 26 Sept 2025

Type 2 Diabetes

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 20 Oct 2025

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    14 Oct 2026, 05:02 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    14 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.