Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2026

4 results

Semaglutide-associated risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Chrzanowski J, Walicka M, Burzyński J, Zaraś M, Michalak A, Fendler W

PLoS medicine21 May 2026

Summary

BackgroundSemaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Recent case reports have raised concerns about a potential association between semaglutide use and the development of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a rare but vision-threatening condition. We aimed to evaluate whether semaglutide use is associated with an increased risk of NAION in patients with T2DM.Methods and findingsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing patients with T2DM aged ≥12 years treated with semaglutide to those receiving other glucose-lowering therapies. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 2023 to November 2025. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, population characteristics, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and ROBINS-I v.2. Certainty of the evidence was graded according to the GRADE framework. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects models; sensitivity analyses included crude and subgroup HRs, and overlapping study replacement. Leave-one-out analysis was conducted to assess small-study effects and publication bias. Results were contextualized within other meta-analyses, systematic reviews, consensus statements, and regulatory communications on the topic. Five eligible observational studies met the inclusion criteria, and 7 additional studies were included in the sensitivity analysis. Semaglutide use was associated with a significantly increased hazard of NAION compared with nonsemaglutide glucose-lowering regimens (HR 2.17, 95% CI [1.73, 2.74]; p < 0.001), regimens excluding other GLP-1 receptor agonists (HR 2.13, 95% CI [1.60, 2.83]; p < 0.001), and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) users (HR 1.96, 95% CI [1.28, 2.99]; p = 0.002). Despite the increased relative risk, the absolute risk remained low at 0.014% (95% CI [0.005%, 0.023%]; p = 0.002), corresponding to approximately 1 additional case of NAION per 7,000 semaglutide-treated patients annually. The results were consistent with meta-analyses of observational studies and corroborated decisions presented in regulatory communications. Due to exclusive focus on retrospective, registry-based observational studies, the evidence synthesis was limited and could be biased by study-level outcome misclassification and confounding.ConclusionsOur findings suggest a possible association between semaglutide use and an increased risk of NAION in patients with T2DM. Although the absolute risk is low, clinicians should be aware of this potential adverse event, particularly in individuals at increased baseline risk for optic neuropathies. While these findings support current recommendations to discontinue semaglutide in patients diagnosed with NAION, the certainty of the available evidence is low, underscoring the need for further high-quality studies to clarify this association.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was associated with a higher hazard of NAION than nonsemaglutide glucose-lowering regimens (pooled HR 2.17).

    In plain wordsIn people with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was linked to a higher risk of an eye nerve condition (NAION) than other diabetes drugs.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNAION risk versus nonsemaglutide glucose-lowering regimens
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Nonsemaglutide glucose-lowering regimens
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Pooled HR
    2.17 HR
    vs nonsemaglutide regimens

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Semaglutide use was associated with a significantly increased hazard of NAION compared with nonsemaglutide glucose-lowering regimens (HR 2.17, 95% CI [1.73, 2.74]; p < 0.001)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing patients with T2DM aged ≥12 years treated with semaglutide to those receiving other glucose-lowering therapies.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was associated with a higher hazard of NAION than regimens excluding other GLP-1 receptor agonists (pooled HR 2.13).

    In plain wordsIn people with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was linked to a higher risk of NAION than diabetes drugs that were not GLP-1 drugs.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNAION risk versus regimens excluding other GLP-1 receptor agonists
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Regimens excluding other GLP-1 receptor agonists
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Pooled HR
    2.13 HR
    vs regimens excluding other GLP-1 RAs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    regimens excluding other GLP-1 receptor agonists (HR 2.13, 95% CI [1.60, 2.83]; p < 0.001)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing patients with T2DM aged ≥12 years treated with semaglutide to those receiving other glucose-lowering therapies.
  3. 03HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was associated with a higher hazard of NAION than SGLT2 inhibitor use (pooled HR 1.96).

    In plain wordsIn people with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide use was linked to a higher risk of NAION than use of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNAION risk versus SGLT2 inhibitor users
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    SGLT2 inhibitor users
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Pooled HR
    1.96 HR
    vs SGLT2i users

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) users (HR 1.96, 95% CI [1.28, 2.99]; p = 0.002).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing patients with T2DM aged ≥12 years treated with semaglutide to those receiving other glucose-lowering therapies.
  4. 04HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, the absolute risk increase of NAION with semaglutide was 0.014% (95% CI 0.005% to 0.023%), about 1 additional case per 7,000 treated patients annually, which the authors call low.

    In plain wordsIn people with type 2 diabetes, the extra risk of NAION with semaglutide was low, about 1 extra case per 7,000 patients a year.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAbsolute risk increase of NAION
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Other glucose-lowering therapies
    Outcome group
    Vision and retina · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Absolute risk increase
    0.014%
    semaglutide versus other glucose-lowering therapies

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Despite the increased relative risk, the absolute risk remained low at 0.014% (95% CI [0.005%, 0.023%]; p = 0.002), corresponding to approximately 1 additional case of NAION per 7,000 semaglutide-treated patients annually.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing patients with T2DM aged ≥12 years treated with semaglutide to those receiving other glucose-lowering therapies.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.