Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2026

7 results

Comparative efficacy of tirzepatide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Shokravi A, Seth J, Mancini GBJ

Cardiovascular diabetology27 Feb 2026Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). With the emergence of the SURPASS-CVOT trial, tirzepatide (a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist) has entered the therapeutic landscape; however, its comparative effect on cardiovascular outcomes compared to placebo and individual GLP-1RAs remains undefined.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Eligible RCTs evaluated tirzepatide or GLP-1RAs and reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), CV mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or non-fatal stroke. A class-level NMA was conducted to estimate the incremental benefit of tirzepatide and GLP-1RAs over placebo, and an agent-level NMA was conducted to explore differences between tirzepatide and individual GLP-1RA agents. Subgroup analyses, including established cardiovascular disease populations, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsEleven trials met inclusion criteria (10 GLP-1RA trials and 1 tirzepatide trial [SURPASS-CVOT]). In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo. Formal statistical comparisons between tirzepatide and the GLP-1RA class could not be performed within the constraints of the NMA; however, point estimates across outcomes numerically favored tirzepatide compared with placebo. In the agent-level analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE compared to placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) and lixisenatide (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not substantially change point estimates.ConclusionAmong adults with T2D and established ASCVD or high CV risk, class-level analysis demonstrated that tirzepatide significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events compared to placebo; at the agent-level, tirzepatide demonstrated comparable efficacy to individual GLP-1RAs. These findings suggest that tirzepatide provides cardiovascular benefit at least comparable to established GLP-1RAs, supporting its emerging role in cardiovascular risk reduction in T2D.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study7

7 results from studies that gave the peptide. 7 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD or high cardiovascular risk, a network meta-analysis found that tirzepatide reduced MACE versus placebo (HR 0.79).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and heart risk, tirzepatide cut major heart events more than placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMACE versus placebo (class-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.79 ratio
    MACE vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD or high cardiovascular risk, a network meta-analysis found that tirzepatide reduced cardiovascular mortality versus placebo (HR 0.77).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and heart risk, tirzepatide lowered heart-related deaths more than placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    DecreaseCardiovascular mortality versus placebo (class-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.77 ratio
    CV mortality vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  3. 03HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD or high cardiovascular risk, a network meta-analysis found that tirzepatide reduced all-cause mortality versus placebo (HR 0.74).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and heart risk, tirzepatide lowered deaths from any cause more than placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAll-cause mortality versus placebo (class-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.74 ratio
    all-cause mortality vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  4. 04HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD or high cardiovascular risk, a network meta-analysis found that tirzepatide reduced non-fatal MI versus placebo (HR 0.77).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and heart risk, tirzepatide lowered non-fatal heart attacks more than placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNon-fatal myocardial infarction versus placebo (class-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.77 ratio
    non-fatal MI vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  5. 05HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD or high cardiovascular risk, a network meta-analysis found that tirzepatide reduced non-fatal stroke versus placebo (HR 0.79).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and heart risk, tirzepatide lowered non-fatal stroke more than placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNon-fatal stroke versus placebo (class-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.79 ratio
    non-fatal stroke vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  6. 06HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the agent-level network meta-analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE versus placebo (HR 0.81).

    In plain wordsIn a pooled analysis of trials, tirzepatide cut major heart events more than placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMACE versus placebo (agent-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.81 ratio
    MACE vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the agent-level analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE compared to placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) and lixisenatide (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.
  7. 07HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the agent-level network meta-analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE versus lixisenatide (HR 0.79).

    In plain wordsIn a pooled analysis of trials, tirzepatide cut major heart events more than lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMACE versus lixisenatide (agent-level NMA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Lixisenatide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    HR
    0.79 ratio
    MACE vs lixisenatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the agent-level analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE compared to placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) and lixisenatide (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:07 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.