Skip to content

Study · In vitro (cells) · 2026

1 result

Assessing Nutraceuticals for Hepatic Steatosis: A Standardized In Vitro Approach.

Palasantzas VEJM, Struik D, Bos T, Withoff S, Fu J, Jonker JW, Hoogerland JA

Nutrients24 Jan 2026Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

Background/Objectives: Nutraceuticals, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and antioxidants (AOXs), are nutrient-derived bioactive compounds considered as potential treatments for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, in vitro studies of their effects are limited by inconsistent experimental conditions, including differences in cell lines, methods of steatosis induction, and culture media, and by reliance on qualitative rather than quantitative assessments. Here, we systematically evaluate the anti-steatotic potential of eight commonly used nutraceuticals-three SCFAs (butyrate, acetate, and propionate) and five AOXs (resveratrol, curcumin, berberine, chlorogenic acid, and vitamin E)-using a standardized in vitro approach. Methods: Following a systematic literature review to identify common experimental conditions, we developed an assay to validate steatosis induction and quantified the effects of the nutraceuticals. For our studies we used the HepG2 liver cancer cell line and the Fa2N-4 immortalized hepatocyte cell line. Steatosis was modeled by stimulating cells with free fatty acids and fructose for 48 h. Nutraceuticals were added either concurrently with steatotic stimulation, to assess preventive effects, or after 24 h to assess therapeutic effects. Anti-steatotic drugs (resmetirom, semaglutide, obeticholic acid, and a DGAT2 inhibitor) were included as positive controls. Intracellular triglyceride levels were measured to quantify steatosis. Results: A systematic review of 46 studies revealed large differences in culture conditions, steatosis induction, and nutraceutical assessment. In our experiments, most nutraceuticals did not reduce intracellular triglycerides, with the exception of vitamin E. Surprisingly, butyrate, berberine, and curcumin increased triglyceride accumulation. Resmetirom was the only drug that significantly decreased triglycerides, while obeticholic acid, semaglutide, and the DGAT2 inhibitor showed minimal or inconsistent effects. Fa2N-4 cells were generally more sensitive than HepG2 cells, showing larger absolute changes in triglyceride levels in response to both nutraceuticals and resmetirom. Conclusions: We established a standardized in vitro assay to evaluate the anti-steatotic potential of nutraceuticals. Using this system, we found that SCFAs and AOXs did not consistently reduce intracellular triglycerides, highlighting the need for quantitative assessments and careful validation when studying anti-steatotic interventions in vitro.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study1

1 result from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01LabIn vitro (cells)Efficacy outcome

    In steatotic HepG2 and Fa2N-4 liver cells, semaglutide showed minimal or inconsistent effects on intracellular triglycerides.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests on liver cells, semaglutide had minimal or inconsistent effects on fat buildup.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIntracellular triglycerides
    Study

    humann: not reported in source

    HepG2 and Fa2N-4 cells with free fatty acid and fructose induced steatosis
    Outcome group
    Liver fat and liver function · Liver
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    obeticholic acid, semaglutide, and the DGAT2 inhibitor showed minimal or inconsistent effects
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    For our studies we used the HepG2 liver cancer cell line and the Fa2N-4 immortalized hepatocyte cell line.
    Summary · context
    Steatosis was modeled by stimulating cells with free fatty acids and fructose for 48 h.
    Summary · context
    Anti-steatotic drugs (resmetirom, semaglutide, obeticholic acid, and a DGAT2 inhibitor) were included as positive controls.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.