Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2026

5 results

Association Between GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Colon Cancer in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Guo M, Liu Y, Zeng Y, Chen J, Zeng C, Huang LL, Wang JY, Wu YH, Wu Q, Teng FY, Xu Y

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews1 Feb 2026

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

1 result from studies that gave the peptide. 1 result from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, network meta-analysis found a potential association between subcutaneous semaglutide (and albiglutide) and lower colon cancer incidence among adults treated for a longer duration and with lower baseline HbA1c levels.

    In plain wordsA pooled analysis linked semaglutide injections to possibly less colon cancer, in people treated longer with lower starting HbA1c.

    Outcome
    DecreaseColon cancer incidence, subcutaneous semaglutide in network meta-analysis
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the network meta-analysis and subgroup analysis, a potential association was observed between albiglutide and subcutaneous semaglutide and a lower incidence of colon cancer among adults treated for a longer duration and with lower baseline HbA1c levels, regardless of baseline body mass index, age…
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 13 June 2024, to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and colorectal, colon, rectal, and intestinal cancers.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 02HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with a lower risk of colon cancer in RCTs (RR 0.34).

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes or obesity, trials of GLP-1 drugs as a class linked them to a lower colon cancer risk.

    Outcome
    DecreaseColon cancer risk, pooled GLP-1 RAs
    Study

    n = 36,415

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.34 RR
    colon cancer, pooled GLP-1 RAs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP-1 RAs was associated with a significantly reduced risk of colon cancer (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.68
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 13 June 2024, to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and colorectal, colon, rectal, and intestinal cancers.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 03HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists had a neutral effect on colorectal carcinoma risk in RCTs (RR 1.13).

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes or obesity, trials of GLP-1 drugs as a class showed no change in colorectal cancer risk.

    Outcome
    No significant changeColorectal carcinoma risk, pooled GLP-1 RAs
    Study

    n = 36,415

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    1.13 RR
    colorectal carcinoma, pooled GLP-1 RAs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    showed a neutral effect on the risk of colorectal carcinoma, rectal, and intestinal cancer, with RRs of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.92-1.39; I2 = 0.0%), 3.64 (95% CI, 0.76-17.40; I2 = 0.0%), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.31-1.84; I2 = 23.3%), respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 13 June 2024, to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and colorectal, colon, rectal, and intestinal cancers.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 04HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists had a neutral effect on rectal cancer risk in RCTs (RR 3.64, wide interval).

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes or obesity, trials of GLP-1 drugs as a class showed no clear change in rectal cancer risk.

    Outcome
    No significant changeRectal cancer risk, pooled GLP-1 RAs
    Study

    n = 36,415

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    3.64 RR
    rectal cancer, pooled GLP-1 RAs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    showed a neutral effect on the risk of colorectal carcinoma, rectal, and intestinal cancer, with RRs of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.92-1.39; I2 = 0.0%), 3.64 (95% CI, 0.76-17.40; I2 = 0.0%), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.31-1.84; I2 = 23.3%), respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 13 June 2024, to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and colorectal, colon, rectal, and intestinal cancers.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 05HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes or obesity, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists had a neutral effect on intestinal cancer risk in RCTs (RR 0.76).

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes or obesity, trials of GLP-1 drugs as a class showed no clear change in intestinal cancer risk.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIntestinal cancer risk, pooled GLP-1 RAs
    Study

    n = 36,415

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.76 RR
    intestinal cancer, pooled GLP-1 RAs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    showed a neutral effect on the risk of colorectal carcinoma, rectal, and intestinal cancer, with RRs of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.92-1.39; I2 = 0.0%), 3.64 (95% CI, 0.76-17.40; I2 = 0.0%), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.31-1.84; I2 = 23.3%), respectively.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 13 June 2024, to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the relationship between GLP-1 RA use and colorectal, colon, rectal, and intestinal cancers.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.