Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2026

4 results

Rate and Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy with Semaglutide Use for Diabetes and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Liu Z, Raveendran D, Fourlanos S, Chong EW

Ophthalmology29 Dec 2025Cited by 5 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with diabetes in observational studies, semaglutide use was associated with higher nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy incidence (HR 1.85).

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, observational studies linked semaglutide use to a higher rate of a sudden vision-loss condition. This does not prove cause.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNAION in observational studies in diabetes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Incidence
    26.7 per 100 000 person-years
    semaglutide
    Incidence
    18.9 per 100 000 person-years
    no semaglutide
    Hazard ratio
    1.85 ratio
    semaglutide vs none

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Observational studies for diabetes showed a pooled NAION incidence of 26.7 per 100 000 person-years in those on semaglutide versus 18.9 per 100 000 person-years in those not on semaglutide (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.20-2.85).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating semaglutide versus placebo or standard therapy in adults.
    Summary · context
    Our search identified 8 RCTs (31 174 patients, including 3 RCTs not previously synthesized in meta-analyses) and 8 observational studies (1 611 278 patients) were included.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In randomized trials in adults with diabetes, semaglutide showed no significant evidence of increased ischemic optic neuropathy risk (RR 1.76).

    In plain wordsIn randomized trials in adults with diabetes, semaglutide did not clearly raise the risk of a sudden vision-loss condition.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIschemic optic neuropathy in RCTs in diabetes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Risk ratio
    1.76 ratio
    semaglutide vs none

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Randomized controlled trials for diabetes demonstrated 5 ischemic optic neuropathy events in those on semaglutide versus one in those not, with no significant evidence of increased risk (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.43-7.25).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating semaglutide versus placebo or standard therapy in adults.
    Summary · context
    Our search identified 8 RCTs (31 174 patients, including 3 RCTs not previously synthesized in meta-analyses) and 8 observational studies (1 611 278 patients) were included.
  3. 03HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In observational studies of semaglutide for weight loss, there was no evidence of increased NAION hazard (HR 1.57).

    In plain wordsIn observational studies of semaglutide for weight loss, there was no clear sign of a higher risk of a sudden vision-loss condition.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNAION in observational studies for weight loss
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    1.57 ratio
    semaglutide vs none

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Observational studies of semaglutide for weight loss showed no evidence of increased NAION hazards (HR 1.57, 95% CI 0.69-3.59)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating semaglutide versus placebo or standard therapy in adults.
    Summary · context
    Our search identified 8 RCTs (31 174 patients, including 3 RCTs not previously synthesized in meta-analyses) and 8 observational studies (1 611 278 patients) were included.
  4. 04HumanSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In randomized trials of semaglutide for weight loss, there was no evidence of increased ischemic optic neuropathy risk (RR 2.18).

    In plain wordsIn randomized trials of semaglutide for weight loss, there was no clear sign of a higher risk of a sudden vision-loss condition.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIschemic optic neuropathy in RCTs for weight loss
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Eye
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Risk ratio
    2.18 ratio
    semaglutide vs none

    Source sentences

    Summary
    RCTs (4 ION events vs one) found no evidence of increased risk (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.33-14.34)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating semaglutide versus placebo or standard therapy in adults.
    Summary · context
    Our search identified 8 RCTs (31 174 patients, including 3 RCTs not previously synthesized in meta-analyses) and 8 observational studies (1 611 278 patients) were included.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.