Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · n = 19,663 · 2025

9 results

Effects of subcutaneous or oral semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tan S, Yin Y, Lu J

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine15 Dec 2025Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide, reduce cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the consistency between oral and subcutaneous formulations remains unclear.MethodsThis meta-analysis was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD 420251147337). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-/random-effects models, with sensitivity, subgroup, and GRADE assessments.ResultsFour RCTs (n = 19,663) showed semaglutide significantly reduced primary outcome risk (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76-0.91), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 0.79; 0.67-0.92), and revascularization (HR 0.71; 0.61-0.83), with a modest decrease in heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.85; 0.72-1.00). No significant effects were seen for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina hospitalization. Subgroup analyses confirmed no efficacy differences between formulations. Evidence quality was "moderate" for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, unstable angina hospitalization, and "high" for the remainder.ConclusionsSemaglutide lowers cardiovascular risk in T2DM, primarily improving major adverse cardiovascular events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization, with oral and subcutaneous forms demonstrating consistent efficacy.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251147337, PROSPERO CRD420251147337.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a meta-analysis of four randomised trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide reduced the risk of the primary cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio 0.83).

    In plain wordsAcross four trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide lowered the risk of major heart and blood vessel events.

    Outcome
    DecreasePrimary cardiovascular outcome risk
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.83 ratio
    primary outcome

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Four RCTs (n = 19,663) showed semaglutide significantly reduced primary outcome risk (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76-0.91)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a meta-analysis of four randomised trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide reduced nonfatal myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 0.79).

    In plain wordsAcross four trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide lowered the risk of non-fatal heart attack.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNonfatal myocardial infarction
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.79 ratio
    nonfatal myocardial infarction

    Source sentences

    Summary
    nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 0.79; 0.67-0.92)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  3. 03HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a meta-analysis of four randomised trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide reduced revascularization (hazard ratio 0.71).

    In plain wordsAcross four trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide lowered the risk of procedures to restore blood flow to the heart.

    Outcome
    DecreaseRevascularization
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.71 ratio
    revascularization

    Source sentences

    Summary
    revascularization (HR 0.71; 0.61-0.83)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  4. 04HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a meta-analysis of four randomised trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide gave a modest decrease in heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.85; 0.72-1.00).

    In plain wordsAcross four trials in type 2 diabetes, semaglutide modestly lowered the risk of hospital stays for heart failure.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHeart failure hospitalization
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.85 ratio
    heart failure hospitalization

    Source sentences

    Summary
    with a modest decrease in heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.85; 0.72-1.00).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  5. 05HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the meta-analysis, semaglutide had no significant effect on cardiovascular death.

    In plain wordsAcross the trials, semaglutide did not clearly change the risk of cardiovascular death.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCardiovascular death
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant effects were seen for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina hospitalization.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  6. 06HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the meta-analysis, semaglutide had no significant effect on all-cause death.

    In plain wordsAcross the trials, semaglutide did not clearly change the risk of death from any cause.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAll-cause death
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant effects were seen for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina hospitalization.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  7. 07HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the meta-analysis, semaglutide had no significant effect on nonfatal stroke.

    In plain wordsAcross the trials, semaglutide did not clearly change the risk of non-fatal stroke.

    Outcome
    No significant changeNonfatal stroke
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant effects were seen for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina hospitalization.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  8. 08HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the meta-analysis, semaglutide had no significant effect on unstable angina hospitalization.

    In plain wordsAcross the trials, semaglutide did not clearly change the risk of hospital stays for unstable angina.

    Outcome
    No significant changeUnstable angina hospitalization
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Control
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant effects were seen for cardiovascular death, all-cause death, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina hospitalization.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.
  9. 09HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In the subgroup analyses of the meta-analysis, cardiovascular efficacy did not differ between oral and subcutaneous semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn the trials combined, oral and injected semaglutide showed no difference in heart protection.

    Outcome
    No significant changeEfficacy difference between oral and subcutaneous semaglutide
    Study

    n = 19,663

    Comparator
    Oral versus subcutaneous semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Subgroup analyses confirmed no efficacy differences between formulations.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.