Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2025

7 results

Hyperdilute Radiesse Preserves Facial Volume in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Users Undergoing Rapid Weight Loss.

Durairaj KK, McCarthy AD, Yambao M, Linnemann-Heath J

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum21 Oct 2025Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

Summary

Biostimulators like hyperdiluted calcium hydroxylapatite-carboxymethylcellulose (CaHA-CMC; Radiesse, Merz North America, Franksville, WI) are effective in promoting neocollagenesis and restoring facial volume. The emergence of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) for weight loss has introduced a subset of patients experiencing rapid weight loss with associated facial-volume changes, colloquially known as "Ozempic Face" (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). This case series describes 4 patients on GLP1RAs who, despite rapid weight loss, maintained facial volume following treatment with hypderilute CaHA-CMC in the lower face. Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face. Patient demographics, BMI, average weight loss, and follow-up assessments were reviewed. Responses were evaluated using standardized photographs, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and patient satisfaction surveys. All 4 GLP1RA users completed both treatment sessions and 6 months follow-up. They lost an average of 24.3 ± 10.4 lb, equivalent to -9.2 ± 4.8% of baseline body weight, yet objective facial metrics remained stable or improved. Average cheek volume increased 9.8%, jowl volume declined 55.8%, nasolabial-fold depth decreased 46.2%, and marionette-line depth decreased 20.6%. At 6 months, investigator GAIS rated every patient "improved" or "much improved," and 100% of patients reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied." Hyperdilute CaHA-CMC may offer benefits in preserving facial volume for patients undergoing weight loss with GLP-1 agonists. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms and optimize treatment protocols for this population. Level of Evidence: 4 (Therapeutic).
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study7

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone7

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    In 4 patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists (drug not specified), average body weight loss was 9.2% of baseline over follow-up.

    In plain wordsIn 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs, average weight loss was 9.2% of starting body weight.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight loss in GLP-1 RA users
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Weight loss
    9.2 % of baseline
    GLP1RA users
    Weight loss
    24.3 lb
    GLP1RA users

    Source sentences

    Summary
    They lost an average of 24.3 ± 10.4 lb, equivalent to -9.2 ± 4.8% of baseline body weight, yet objective facial metrics remained stable or improved.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    In 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users with rapid weight loss, hyperdilute CaHA-CMC treatment was followed by a 9.8% increase in average cheek volume.

    In plain wordsIn 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs, average cheek volume rose 9.8% after a facial filler treatment.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCheek volume after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Cheek volume change
    9.8%
    after CaHA-CMC

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Average cheek volume increased 9.8%, jowl volume declined 55.8%, nasolabial-fold depth decreased 46.2%, and marionette-line depth decreased 20.6%.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    In 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users with rapid weight loss, hyperdilute CaHA-CMC treatment was followed by a 55.8% decline in jowl volume.

    In plain wordsIn 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs, jowl volume fell 55.8% after a facial filler treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseJowl volume after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Jowl volume change
    −55.8%
    after CaHA-CMC

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Average cheek volume increased 9.8%, jowl volume declined 55.8%, nasolabial-fold depth decreased 46.2%, and marionette-line depth decreased 20.6%.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 04HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    In 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users with rapid weight loss, hyperdilute CaHA-CMC treatment was followed by a 46.2% decrease in nasolabial-fold depth.

    In plain wordsIn 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs, nasolabial-fold depth fell 46.2% after a facial filler treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNasolabial-fold depth after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Nasolabial-fold depth change
    −46.2%
    after CaHA-CMC

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Average cheek volume increased 9.8%, jowl volume declined 55.8%, nasolabial-fold depth decreased 46.2%, and marionette-line depth decreased 20.6%.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  5. 05HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    In 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users with rapid weight loss, hyperdilute CaHA-CMC treatment was followed by a 20.6% decrease in marionette-line depth.

    In plain wordsIn 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs, marionette-line depth fell 20.6% after a facial filler treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMarionette-line depth after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Marionette-line depth change
    −20.6%
    after CaHA-CMC

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Average cheek volume increased 9.8%, jowl volume declined 55.8%, nasolabial-fold depth decreased 46.2%, and marionette-line depth decreased 20.6%.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  6. 06HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    At 6 months after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC, the investigator rated every one of 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users as improved or much improved.

    In plain wordsSix months after a facial filler treatment, the investigator rated all 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs as improved or much improved.

    Outcome
    IncreaseInvestigator-rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale at 6 months
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 6 months, investigator GAIS rated every patient "improved" or "much improved,"
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  7. 07HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneCase report or seriesEfficacy outcome

    At 6 months after hyperdilute CaHA-CMC, all 4 GLP-1 receptor agonist users reported being satisfied or very satisfied.

    In plain wordsSix months after a facial filler treatment, all 4 patients on GLP-1 drugs said they were satisfied or very satisfied.

    Outcome
    Not applicablePatient satisfaction at 6 months
    Study

    n = 4

    Outcome group
    Skin and hair · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Satisfied or very satisfied
    100%
    patients

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and 100% of patients reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied."
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Four patients undergoing rapid weight loss with GLP1RA were retrospectively evaluated following hyperdilute (1:3) CaHA-CMC treatment in the lower face.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.