Skip to content

Study · Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 2025

7 results

Therapeutic Potential of Carnosine in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Preclinical Study in Muscle Tissue.

Erol G, Kartal H, Demirdaş E, Arslan G, Ozdem T, Yavuz B

Cardiology research and practice26 Aug 2025

Summary

Background: Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, a process involving the disruption and subsequent restoration of blood flow, is a significant contributing factor to both cardiovascular diseases and broader tissue damage. Carnosine, a natural dipeptide notably abundant in muscle tissue and recognized for its antioxidant attributes, may offer protective benefits against the deleterious effects of IR injury. Methods: A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR. The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure. Muscle tissue samples were subsequently analyzed to quantify markers indicative of oxidative stress, inflammation, and cellular demise. Results: Our findings demonstrated that, when compared to control groups, the IR group exhibited a significant elevation in key markers of oxidative stress (total oxidant status [TOS], Oxidative Stress Index [OSI]), inflammation (myeloperoxidase [MPO]), and cell death (TUNEL, Necrosis, Edema). Specifically, the IR group presented with a TOS of 8.72 ± 0.97 μmol/L, an OSI of 2.03 ± 0.18, and an MPO level of 75.93 ± 5.72 U/L, contrasting with control values of 4.23 ± 0.56 μmol/L, 1.01 ± 0.13, and 43.26 ± 5.7 U/L, respectively. Histopathological assessments corroborated these findings, revealing severe necrosis (2.50 ± 0.55), edema (2.00 ± 0.63), and notable inflammatory cell infiltration (2.67 ± 0.52) within the IR group. Furthermore, apoptosis (quantified by TUNEL assay) was significantly increased to 18.83 ± 1.47% in the IR group. Carnosine administration in the Carnosine + IR group led to a substantial reduction in all these adverse markers, bringing their levels closer to those observed in the control groups. For instance, in the Carnosine + IR group, TOS decreased to 5.63 ± 0.87 μmol/L, OSI to 1.24 ± 0.25, and MPO to 55.91 ± 3.45 U/L. Similarly, histopathological scores for necrosis, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration were markedly lower in the Carnosine + IR group. Conclusion: Our experimental findings strongly suggest that exogenously administered carnosine significantly reduces oxidative stress, suppresses inflammation, and attenuates cell death in skeletal muscle subjected to IR injury. These results highlight carnosine's promising therapeutic potential as a pharmacological agent for mitigating tissue damage in ischemic conditions.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study7

7 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, carnosine reduced TOS to 5.63 ± 0.87 μmol/L versus the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced total oxidant status compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTotal oxidant status
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Oxidative stress · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Measurements

    TOS
    5.63 μmol/L
    Carnosine + IR

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For instance, in the Carnosine + IR group, TOS decreased to 5.63 ± 0.87 μmol/L, OSI to 1.24 ± 0.25, and MPO to 55.91 ± 3.45 U/L.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  2. 02AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, carnosine reduced OSI to 1.24 ± 0.25 versus the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced the oxidative stress index compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseOxidative Stress Index
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Oxidative stress · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Measurements

    OSI
    1.24 index
    Carnosine + IR

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For instance, in the Carnosine + IR group, TOS decreased to 5.63 ± 0.87 μmol/L, OSI to 1.24 ± 0.25, and MPO to 55.91 ± 3.45 U/L.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  3. 03AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, carnosine reduced MPO to 55.91 ± 3.45 U/L versus the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced myeloperoxidase compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMyeloperoxidase
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Measurements

    MPO
    55.91 U/L
    Carnosine + IR

    Source sentences

    Summary
    For instance, in the Carnosine + IR group, TOS decreased to 5.63 ± 0.87 μmol/L, OSI to 1.24 ± 0.25, and MPO to 55.91 ± 3.45 U/L.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  4. 04AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, necrosis scores were lower with carnosine than in the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced necrosis scores compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNecrosis score
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Muscle injury and repair · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similarly, histopathological scores for necrosis, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration were markedly lower in the Carnosine + IR group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  5. 05AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, edema scores were lower with carnosine than in the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced edema scores compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseEdema score
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Muscle injury and repair · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similarly, histopathological scores for necrosis, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration were markedly lower in the Carnosine + IR group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  6. 06AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, inflammatory cell infiltration scores were lower with carnosine than in the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced inflammatory cell infiltration compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseInflammatory cell infiltration
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similarly, histopathological scores for necrosis, edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration were markedly lower in the Carnosine + IR group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.
  7. 07AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In rats with muscle IR injury, carnosine reduced apoptosis compared with the IR group.

    In plain wordsIn rats with muscle injury, carnosine reduced cell death compared with the untreated IR group.

    Outcome
    DecreaseApoptosis by TUNEL
    Study

    ratn: not reported in source

    Skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury
    Comparator
    IR group
    Outcome group
    Muscle injury and repair · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    250 mg/kg · intraperitoneal injectionAs given in this study (rat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Carnosine administration in the Carnosine + IR group led to a substantial reduction in all these adverse markers, bringing their levels closer to those observed in the control groups.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Furthermore, apoptosis (quantified by TUNEL assay) was significantly increased to 18.83 ± 1.47% in the IR group.
    Summary · context
    A total of 24 rats were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: control, carnosine control, IR, and Carnosine + IR.
    Summary · context
    The IR and Carnosine + IR groups underwent a simulated blood flow blockage lasting 120 min, followed by 120 min of reperfusion.
    Summary · context
    Animals in the carnosine-treated groups received 250 mg/kg of carnosine via intraperitoneal injection prior to the experimental procedure.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    27 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.