Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2025

17 results

Orforglipron, an oral non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, improves markers of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.

Rosenstock J, Robins DA, Duffin KL, Wilson JM, Lin Y, Banerjee H, Eyde S, Kazda C, Konig M, Mather KJ

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism14 Aug 2025Cited by 11 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study17

17 results from studies that gave the peptide. 17 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were associated with improved beta-cell function.

    In plain wordsOrforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were linked to improved insulin-producing cell function in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseBeta-cell function
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were associated with improved β-cell function and insulin sensitivity.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were associated with improved insulin sensitivity.

    In plain wordsOrforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were linked to improved insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseInsulin sensitivity
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher were associated with improved β-cell function and insulin sensitivity.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, HOMA-B based on C-peptide increased up to 123% with orforglipron by week 4 before stabilising.

    In plain wordsThe C-peptide measure of insulin-producing cell function increased up to 123% from baseline with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHOMA-B C-peptide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HOMA-B increase (C-peptide)
    ≤ 123%
    orforglipron 12 mg and higher, baseline to week 4

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-B increased up to 123% (C-peptide) and 132% (insulin) with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher from baseline to week 4 before stabilising.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, HOMA-B based on insulin increased up to 132% with orforglipron by week 4 before stabilising.

    In plain wordsThe insulin measure of insulin-producing cell function increased up to 132% from baseline with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHOMA-B insulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HOMA-B increase (insulin)
    ≤ 132%
    orforglipron 12 mg and higher, baseline to week 4

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-B increased up to 123% (C-peptide) and 132% (insulin) with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher from baseline to week 4 before stabilising.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, all orforglipron doses increased HOMA-B more than dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsAll orforglipron doses improved the measure of insulin-producing cell function more than dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    IncreaseHOMA-B versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    all doses (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg) · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-B increases were greater with all orforglipron doses than with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, fasting proinsulin improved with orforglipron compared with baseline.

    In plain wordsFasting proinsulin improved with orforglipron compared with baseline in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedFasting proinsulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, fasting proinsulin improved more with orforglipron than dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsFasting proinsulin improved more with orforglipron than dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedFasting proinsulin versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, the proinsulin/insulin ratio improved with orforglipron compared with baseline.

    In plain wordsThe proinsulin/insulin ratio improved with orforglipron compared with baseline in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProinsulin/insulin ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, the proinsulin/insulin ratio improved more with orforglipron than dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsThe proinsulin/insulin ratio improved more with orforglipron than dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProinsulin/insulin ratio versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    12 mg and higher · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR based on C-peptide decreased up to 16% with orforglipron by week 26.

    In plain wordsThe C-peptide measure of insulin resistance decreased up to 16% from baseline with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-IR C-peptide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HOMA-IR decrease (C-peptide)
    ≤ 16%
    orforglipron, baseline to week 26

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-IR values decreased up to 16% (C-peptide) and 23% (insulin) with orforglipron by week 26.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR based on insulin decreased up to 23% with orforglipron by week 26.

    In plain wordsThe insulin measure of insulin resistance decreased up to 23% from baseline with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-IR insulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HOMA-IR decrease (insulin)
    ≤ 23%
    orforglipron, baseline to week 26

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-IR values decreased up to 16% (C-peptide) and 23% (insulin) with orforglipron by week 26.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, only the highest orforglipron dose significantly reduced insulin-based HOMA-IR versus baseline.

    In plain wordsOnly the highest orforglipron dose significantly reduced the insulin resistance measure versus baseline in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-IR insulin highest dose
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    45 mg · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Reductions in HOMA-IR (insulin) were significant versus baseline only for the highest dose.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, IGFBP-2 generally improved with orforglipron.

    In plain wordsIGFBP-2, a marker related to insulin sensitivity, generally improved with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedIGFBP-2
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    IGFBP-2 and adiponectin, corollary biomarkers of insulin sensitivity, were generally improved with orforglipron.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  14. 14HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, adiponectin generally improved with orforglipron.

    In plain wordsAdiponectin, a marker related to insulin sensitivity, generally improved with orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedAdiponectin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oral · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    IGFBP-2 and adiponectin, corollary biomarkers of insulin sensitivity, were generally improved with orforglipron.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  15. 15HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D, dulaglutide produced smaller HOMA-B increases than all orforglipron doses.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide increased a beta-cell function marker less than orforglipron.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-B increase
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Orforglipron
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HOMA-B increases were greater with all orforglipron doses than with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  16. 16HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D, fasting proinsulin improved less with dulaglutide than with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, fasting proinsulin improved less with dulaglutide than with higher orforglipron doses.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedFasting proinsulin improvement
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Orforglipron
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.
  17. 17HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D, the proinsulin/insulin ratio improved less with dulaglutide than with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio improved less with dulaglutide than with higher orforglipron doses.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedProinsulin/insulin ratio improvement
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Orforglipron
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Additional β-cell function biomarkers, such as fasting proinsulin and the proinsulin/insulin ratio, also improved with orforglipron doses of 12 mg and higher compared with baseline and to a greater extent than seen with dulaglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants (N = 378) in this 26-week phase 2 study with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to orforglipron (3, 12, 24, 36, or 45 mg), dulaglutide (1.5 mg), or placebo.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 2

    14 Oct 2026, 05:02 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 1

    14 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.