Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 43 · 2025

12 results

Comparative Efficacy of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (Esg) Versus Liraglutide in Weight Loss and Remission Of Obesity-Related Comorbidities: Twelve Months Follow-Up Results.

Nigro S, Vinciguerra F, Guccione F, Alibrandi A, Filannino R, Navarra G

Obesity surgery8 Aug 2025

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study12

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide produced lower percentage excess weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 3 months (P=0.001).

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide led to less excess weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 3 months.

    Outcome
    Decreasepercentage excess weight loss at 3 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P-value
    0.001
    reported early weight-loss contrasts

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 3 and 6 months, %EWL and %TWL were greater in the ESG group (P = 0.001).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide produced lower percentage total weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 3 months (P=0.001).

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide led to less total weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 3 months.

    Outcome
    Decreasepercentage total weight loss at 3 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P-value
    0.001
    reported early weight-loss contrasts

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 3 and 6 months, %EWL and %TWL were greater in the ESG group (P = 0.001).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide produced lower percentage excess weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 6 months (P=0.001).

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide led to less excess weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 6 months.

    Outcome
    Decreasepercentage excess weight loss at 6 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P-value
    0.001
    reported early weight-loss contrasts

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 3 and 6 months, %EWL and %TWL were greater in the ESG group (P = 0.001).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide produced lower percentage total weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 6 months (P=0.001).

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide led to less total weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty at 6 months.

    Outcome
    Decreasepercentage total weight loss at 6 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    P-value
    0.001
    reported early weight-loss contrasts

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 3 and 6 months, %EWL and %TWL were greater in the ESG group (P = 0.001).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty did not differ significantly in percentage excess weight loss at 12 months.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty showed no significant excess weight loss difference at 12 months.

    Outcome
    No significant changepercentage excess weight loss at 12 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    However, at 12 months, these differences were no longer statistically significant, suggesting that the ESG group was experiencing some weight regain, while the Liraglutide group had a slower but more consistent weight loss.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty did not differ significantly in percentage total weight loss at 12 months.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty showed no significant total weight loss difference at 12 months.

    Outcome
    No significant changepercentage total weight loss at 12 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    However, at 12 months, these differences were no longer statistically significant, suggesting that the ESG group was experiencing some weight regain, while the Liraglutide group had a slower but more consistent weight loss.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty did not differ significantly in resolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 3 months.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty showed no significant comorbidity resolution difference at 3 months.

    Outcome
    No significant changeresolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 3 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Regarding the resolution of comorbidities, there were no statistically significant differences at 3, 6 and 12 months between the two groups.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty did not differ significantly in resolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 6 months.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty showed no significant comorbidity resolution difference at 6 months.

    Outcome
    No significant changeresolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 6 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Regarding the resolution of comorbidities, there were no statistically significant differences at 3, 6 and 12 months between the two groups.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty did not differ significantly in resolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 12 months.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty showed no significant comorbidity resolution difference at 12 months.

    Outcome
    No significant changeresolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 12 months
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Regarding the resolution of comorbidities, there were no statistically significant differences at 3, 6 and 12 months between the two groups.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In class I/II obesity trial participants, the liraglutide group had slower but more consistent weight loss than the ESG group at the 12-month comparison; no trajectory-specific coefficient was stated.

    In plain wordsIn people with obesity, liraglutide had slower but more consistent weight loss than endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; the trajectory estimate was unspecified.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedQualitative weight-loss trajectory at 12-month comparison
    Study

    n = 43

    Comparator
    endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    However, at 12 months, these differences were no longer statistically significant, suggesting that the ESG group was experiencing some weight regain, while the Liraglutide group had a slower but more consistent weight loss.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 11HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, no patients had major complications during liraglutide or endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty treatment.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity, no major complications were reported with liraglutide or endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.

    Outcome
    Not applicablemajor complications
    Study

    n = 43

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    None of the patients had major complications or significant side effects.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 12HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with class I or II obesity, no patients had significant side effects during liraglutide or endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty treatment.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity, no significant side effects were reported with liraglutide or endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.

    Outcome
    Not applicablesignificant side effects
    Study

    n = 43

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    None of the patients had major complications or significant side effects.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A prospective, randomized controlled, monocentric study was performed.
    Summary · context
    A total of 43 patients with class I and II obesity were included in the study.
    Summary · context
    Twenty-three patients underwent ESG, and 20 patients were treated with Liraglutide.
    Summary · context
    All participants received standardized follow-up protocols with assessments by both surgeon and nutritionist in the bariatric ambulatory setting.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.