Skip to content

Study · Observational study · n = 62 · 2025

9 results

Effectiveness of liraglutide in the treatment of adolescent obesity.

Ruiz Pons M, Gutiérrez Vilar M, García Zurita C, Fuentes Ferrer ME, Pérez Rodríguez A, Rosado Alonso C

Anales de pediatria10 Jul 2025Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

3 results from studies that gave the peptide. 3 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In an observational comparison of adolescents with obesity, liraglutide plus lifestyle modification was associated with a greater BMI z-score decrease than lifestyle modification alone (-1.09 [SD 0.24] vs -0.10 [SD 0.25]; P=.001).

    In plain wordsIn adolescents with obesity, liraglutide plus lifestyle changes was linked to a larger BMI z-score decrease than lifestyle changes alone.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBMI z score
    Study

    n = 62

    Comparator
    Lifestyle modification alone
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 6.9 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean BMI-z change
    −1.09
    liraglutide plus lifestyle
    BMI-z change SD
    0.24
    liraglutide plus lifestyle
    Mean BMI-z change
    −0.1
    lifestyle controls
    BMI-z change SD
    0.25
    lifestyle controls

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the intervention group, the BMI z score decreased significantly (mean, -1.09 [SD, 0.24] vs -0.10 [SD, 0.25] in controls; P=.001).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In an observational comparison of adolescents with obesity, liraglutide plus lifestyle modification was associated with more patients achieving at least 5% BMI reduction than controls (48.4% vs 3%; P<.05).

    In plain wordsIn adolescents with obesity, adding liraglutide was linked to more patients reaching 5% BMI reduction than lifestyle changes alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseBMI reduction of 5% or greater
    Study

    n = 62

    Comparator
    Lifestyle modification alone
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 6.9 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion
    48.4%
    liraglutide plus lifestyle modification
    Proportion
    3%
    controls

    Source sentences

    Summary
    This corresponded to a BMI reduction of 5% or greater in 48.4% of patients and 10% or greater in 29%, compared to 3% and 1%, respectively, in the control group (P<.05).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In an observational comparison of adolescents with obesity, liraglutide plus lifestyle modification was associated with more patients achieving at least 10% BMI reduction than controls (29% vs 1%; P<.05).

    In plain wordsIn adolescents with obesity, adding liraglutide was linked to more patients reaching 10% BMI reduction than lifestyle changes alone.

    Outcome
    IncreaseBMI reduction of 10% or greater
    Study

    n = 62

    Comparator
    Lifestyle modification alone
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 6.9 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion
    29%
    liraglutide plus lifestyle modification
    Proportion
    1%
    controls

    Source sentences

    Summary
    This corresponded to a BMI reduction of 5% or greater in 48.4% of patients and 10% or greater in 29%, compared to 3% and 1%, respectively, in the control group (P<.05).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 04HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, weight loss was reportedly maintained at six-month follow-up; the reported weight-loss maintenance result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, weight loss was reportedly maintained at six-month follow-up; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedWeight loss at follow-up
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The weight loss was maintained at six months of follow-up (T3).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 05HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, insulin levels decreased; the reported insulin levels result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, insulin levels decreased; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    DecreaseInsulin levels
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a significant reduction in insulin levels, the HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels, systolic hypertension (HTN), and the number of prediabetic patients.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 06HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, HOMA-IR decreased; the reported HOMA-IR result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, HOMA-IR decreased; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-IR
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a significant reduction in insulin levels, the HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels, systolic hypertension (HTN), and the number of prediabetic patients.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  4. 07HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, triglycerides decreased; the reported triglycerides result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, triglycerides decreased; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTriglycerides
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Lipids · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a significant reduction in insulin levels, the HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels, systolic hypertension (HTN), and the number of prediabetic patients.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  5. 08HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, systolic hypertension decreased; the reported systolic hypertension result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, systolic hypertension decreased; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    DecreaseSystolic hypertension
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Blood pressure · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a significant reduction in insulin levels, the HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels, systolic hypertension (HTN), and the number of prediabetic patients.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  6. 09HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In the adolescent obesity cohort comparing liraglutide/lifestyle with lifestyle alone, the number of participants with prediabetes decreased; the reported prediabetic participant count result did not identify a native-specific arm estimate or exact reference.

    In plain wordsIn adolescent obesity cohorts including liraglutide, the number of participants with prediabetes decreased; the exact group comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    DecreasePrediabetes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a significant reduction in insulin levels, the HOMA-IR, triglyceride levels, systolic hypertension (HTN), and the number of prediabetic patients.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Retrospective observational study of 62 adolescents (12-18 years) with a body mass index (BMI) at or above the 95th percentile.
    Summary · context
    The intervention group (n=31) received liraglutide plus LM, while controls (n=31) matched for age, sex and treatment duration were managed with LM alone.
    Summary · context
    We analyzed anthropometric, cardiovascular and body composition variables at three time points: baseline (T1), end of treatment (T2: mean, 6.9 months; SD, 4.7), and follow-up (T3: mean, 12.5 months; SD, 4.9 months).
    Summary · context
    Comparisons between groups were performed using adjusted analysis of covariance model for changes in quantitative variables and logistic regression for BMI reductions of 5% or greater and 10% or greater.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.