Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2025

1 result

What the diabetologist needs to know about the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and GLP-1 receptor agonist use in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Feldman-Billard S

Diabetes & metabolism16 May 2025Cited by 9 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, studies reported a relative increase in NAION risk with GLP-1 receptor agonists, mainly semaglutide, from nonsignificant to fourfold; the absolute number affected stayed low and no causal link was shown.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, studies of GLP-1 drugs, mainly semaglutide, found optic nerve vision loss risk from no clear rise to fourfold. No cause shown.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNAION risk with GLP-1 receptor agonist use in type 2 diabetes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Eye

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Across studies including patients with T2D, the relative increase in NAION risk associated with the use of a GLP-1 RA, mainly semaglutide, ranged from nonsignificant to fourfold, while the absolute number of affected patients remained low.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Given the retrospective design of the main studies, no causal link could be established between the use of GLP-1RAs and NAION.
    Summary · context
    A literature search strategy was conducted for all English-language literature with a systematic review of key references up to April 2025.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.