Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2025

7 results

Dual-stabilized selenium nanoparticles with chitosan and SS31 peptide: Resolving instability for enhancing ROS elimination, suppressing inflammation, and combating bacterial infections.

Ming P, Wei Y, Zhu Y, Li K, Zhu W, Qiu J

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces30 Apr 2025Cited by 6 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone7

In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  1. 01AnimalNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In zebrafish with copper sulfate-induced inflammation, CS/SS31-SeNPs pretreatment reduced neutrophil recruitment by 38.07 %, more than bare SeNPs.

    In plain wordsIn zebrafish with induced inflammation, a nanoparticle containing SS31 reduced immune cell recruitment more than the nanoparticle without it.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNeutrophil recruitment
    Study

    zebrafishn: not reported in source

    copper sulfate-induced inflammation
    Comparator
    Bare SeNPs
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation

    Measurements

    Neutrophil recruitment reduction
    38.07%
    CS/SS31-SeNPs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In a copper sulfate-induced zebrafish inflammation model, CS/SS31-SeNPs pretreatment reduced neutrophil and macrophage recruitment by 38.07 % and 43.56 %, respectively, outperforming bare SeNPs.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  2. 02AnimalNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In zebrafish with copper sulfate-induced inflammation, CS/SS31-SeNPs pretreatment reduced macrophage recruitment by 43.56 %, more than bare SeNPs.

    In plain wordsIn zebrafish with induced inflammation, a nanoparticle containing SS31 reduced immune cell recruitment more than the nanoparticle without it.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMacrophage recruitment
    Study

    zebrafishn: not reported in source

    copper sulfate-induced inflammation
    Comparator
    Bare SeNPs
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation

    Measurements

    Macrophage recruitment reduction
    43.56%
    CS/SS31-SeNPs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In a copper sulfate-induced zebrafish inflammation model, CS/SS31-SeNPs pretreatment reduced neutrophil and macrophage recruitment by 38.07 % and 43.56 %, respectively, outperforming bare SeNPs.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  3. 03LabNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneIn vitro (cells)Efficacy outcome

    The CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite showed enhanced ROS scavenging efficiency in vitro and in vivo.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests and animals, a nanoparticle containing SS31 cleared reactive oxygen species better.

    Outcome
    IncreaseROS scavenging in vitro and in vivo
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The nanocomposites demonstrated enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging efficiency in vitro and in vivo.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  4. 04LabNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    CS/SS31-SeNPs showed superior antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, with near-complete growth inhibition at 64 μM.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a nanoparticle containing SS31 almost fully stopped Staphylococcus aureus growth at 64 μM.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAntibacterial activity against S. aureus
    Study

    Staphylococcus aureusn: not reported in source

    CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite
    Outcome group
    Infection and antimicrobial activity · Infection

    Measurements

    Growth inhibition concentration
    64 μM
    S. aureus

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Furthermore, CS/SS31-SeNPs exhibited superior antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, achieving near-complete growth inhibition at 64 μM.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  5. 05LabNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    The CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite was spherical (82 nm, +48 mV zeta potential) and showed no aggregation over 90 days.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a nanoparticle made with SS31, chitosan and selenium was stable for 90 days.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNanocomposite size, charge and stability
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Diameter
    82 nm
    CS/SS31-SeNPs
    Zeta potential
    48 mV
    CS/SS31-SeNPs

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The optimized CS/SS31-SeNPs exhibited a uniform spherical structure (82 nm diameter, +48 mV zeta potential) and exceptional stability (no aggregation over 90 days
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  6. 06LabNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Mechanism

    Mechanistic studies indicated that the antibacterial action of CS/SS31-SeNPs stems from targeting the MraY enzyme in peptidoglycan synthesis.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, a nanoparticle containing SS31 appeared to kill bacteria by acting on an enzyme needed for cell wall building.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAntibacterial target MraY
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Infection

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Mechanistic studies revealed that the antibacterial action stems from targeting the conserved MraY enzyme in peptidoglycan synthesis.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

  7. 07Computer modelNot a test of Elamipretide (SS-31) aloneIn silicoMechanism

    Molecular docking indicated stable binding of CS/SS31-SeNPs to the uracil pocket of MraY and adjacent sites.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, a nanoparticle containing SS31 bound stably to a bacterial enzyme.

    Outcome
    Not applicableDocking binding energy to MraY
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    CS/SS31-SeNPs nanocomposite
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    Docking binding energy
    −15.6 kcal/mol
    MraY uracil pocket

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Molecular docking indicated stable binding (-15.6 kcal/mol) of CS/SS31-SeNPs to MraY's uracil pocket and adjacent sites-a mechanism distinct from conventional antibiotics, suggesting broad-spectrum potential.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    To address this, we developed a novel nanocomposite by co-stabilizing SeNPs with chitosan and the mitochondria-targeting peptide SS31 (CS/SS31-SeNPs) via a redox synthesis method.

    In this study, Elamipretide (SS-31) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Elamipretide (SS-31).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    10 Oct 2026, 08:19 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 02:47 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.