Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 1,389 · 2025

2 results

Efficacy of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Exenatide in Patients Undergoing CABG or Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Kjaergaard J, Møller CH, Wiberg S, Mikkelsen AD, Møller-Sørensen H, Ravn HB, Ravn J, Olsen PS, Høfsten DE, Boesgaard S, Køber L, Nilsson JC, Hassager C

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions23 Apr 2025Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In cardiac surgery patients, the composite primary endpoint occurred in 170 (24%) patients given exenatide and 165 (24%) in the other group, and exenatide did not significantly reduce it.

    In plain wordsIn cardiac surgery patients, the composite primary outcome occurred in 24% of exenatide recipients and 24% of the other group, with no significant reduction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeComposite death, stroke, dialysis-requiring renal failure or new/worsening heart failure
    Study

    n = 1,389

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    17.4 µg · infusion · during cardiopulmonary bypass and first hour after weaningAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Primary endpoint events
    170 patients
    exenatide
    Primary endpoint incidence
    24%
    exenatide
    Primary endpoint events
    165 patients
    comparison group
    Primary endpoint incidence
    24%
    comparison group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Within a follow-up period of a median of 5.9 years (min-max; 2.5-8.3 years), 170 (24%) patients in the exenatide group and 165 (24%) patients experienced a primary end point.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The main outcome was time to a composite end point consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new/worsening heart failure during follow-up.
    Summary · context
    We included adult patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement.
    Summary · context
    The intervention was an infusion of 17.4 µg of exenatide or placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first hour after weaning thereof.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In cardiac surgery patients, adverse event rates did not significantly differ between exenatide and placebo.

    In plain wordsIn cardiac surgery patients, side effect rates did not significantly differ between exenatide and placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAdverse events
    Study

    n = 1,389

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    17.4 µg · infusion · during cardiopulmonary bypass and first hour after weaningAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    We found no significant difference in rates of adverse events between the 2 groups.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Secondary end points included occurrence of prespecified adverse events.
    Summary · context
    We included adult patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement.
    Summary · context
    The intervention was an infusion of 17.4 µg of exenatide or placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first hour after weaning thereof.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

Status unknownNot applicableNCT02673931

GLP-1 and Hyperoxia for Organ Protection in Heart Surgery

Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitaletn = 1,400Feb 2016 to est. Sept 2024

Coronary Disease · Shock, Cardiogenic · Renal Failure · Stroke · Brain Injury · Aortic Valve Disease

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 28 Aug 2024

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.