Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2025

4 results

Allocation of Semaglutide According to Coronary Artery Calcium and BMI: Applying the SELECT Trial to MESA.

Razavi AC, Cao Zhang AM, Dardari ZA, Nasir K, Khorsandi M, Mortensen MB, Al-Mallah MH, Shapiro MD, Daubert MA, Blumenthal RS, Sperling LS, Whelton SP, Blaha MJ, Dzaye O

JACC. Cardiovascular imaging8 Jan 2025Cited by 15 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 01Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model applying SELECT trial estimates to MESA adults without diabetes or CVD, the 5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for MACE was 653 with CAC = 0 and 79 with CAC of 300 or more.

    In plain wordsIn a model, semaglutide needs fewer patients with high coronary calcium than with none to prevent one major heart event over 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicable5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for MACE
    Study

    humann = 3,129

    SELECT risk reduction estimates applied to MESA participants
    Comparator
    CAC = 0 versus CAC >= 300
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    5-year number needed to treat
    653
    CAC = 0, MACE
    5-year number needed to treat
    79
    CAC >=300, MACE

    Source sentences

    Summary
    for MACE (653 vs 79)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this analysis, 3,129 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) without diabetes or clinical CVD met body mass index criteria for semaglutide and underwent CAC scoring on noncontrast cardiac computed tomography.
    Summary · context
    Risk reduction estimates from the SELECT (Semaglutide Effects on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients with Overweight or Obesity) trial (median follow-up: 3.3 years) were applied to observed incidence rates for semaglutide 5-year number-needed-to-treat calculations.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 02Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model applying SELECT trial estimates to MESA adults without diabetes or CVD, the 5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for heart failure was 1,094 with CAC = 0 and 144 with CAC of 300 or more.

    In plain wordsIn a model, semaglutide needs fewer patients with high coronary calcium than with none to prevent one heart failure case in 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicable5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for heart failure
    Study

    humann = 3,129

    SELECT risk reduction estimates applied to MESA participants
    Comparator
    CAC = 0 versus CAC >= 300
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    5-year number needed to treat
    1094
    CAC = 0, heart failure
    5-year number needed to treat
    144
    CAC >=300, heart failure

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HF (1,094 vs 144)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this analysis, 3,129 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) without diabetes or clinical CVD met body mass index criteria for semaglutide and underwent CAC scoring on noncontrast cardiac computed tomography.
    Summary · context
    Risk reduction estimates from the SELECT (Semaglutide Effects on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients with Overweight or Obesity) trial (median follow-up: 3.3 years) were applied to observed incidence rates for semaglutide 5-year number-needed-to-treat calculations.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 03Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model applying SELECT trial estimates to MESA adults without diabetes or CVD, the 5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for chronic kidney disease was 1,044 with CAC = 0 and 144 with CAC of 300 or more.

    In plain wordsIn a model, semaglutide needs fewer patients with high coronary calcium than with none to prevent one kidney disease case in 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicable5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for chronic kidney disease
    Study

    humann = 3,129

    SELECT risk reduction estimates applied to MESA participants
    Comparator
    CAC = 0 versus CAC >= 300
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary

    Measurements

    5-year number needed to treat
    1044
    CAC = 0, CKD
    5-year number needed to treat
    144
    CAC >=300, CKD

    Source sentences

    Summary
    CKD (1,044 vs 144)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this analysis, 3,129 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) without diabetes or clinical CVD met body mass index criteria for semaglutide and underwent CAC scoring on noncontrast cardiac computed tomography.
    Summary · context
    Risk reduction estimates from the SELECT (Semaglutide Effects on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients with Overweight or Obesity) trial (median follow-up: 3.3 years) were applied to observed incidence rates for semaglutide 5-year number-needed-to-treat calculations.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 04Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model applying SELECT trial estimates to MESA adults without diabetes or CVD, the 5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for all-cause mortality was 408 with CAC = 0 and 98 with CAC of 300 or more.

    In plain wordsIn a model, semaglutide needs fewer patients with high coronary calcium than with none to prevent one death over 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicable5-year number needed to treat with semaglutide for all-cause mortality
    Study

    humann = 3,129

    SELECT risk reduction estimates applied to MESA participants
    Comparator
    CAC = 0 versus CAC >= 300
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body

    Measurements

    5-year number needed to treat
    408
    CAC = 0, all-cause mortality
    5-year number needed to treat
    98
    CAC >=300, all-cause mortality

    Source sentences

    Summary
    all-cause mortality (408 vs 98)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this analysis, 3,129 participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) without diabetes or clinical CVD met body mass index criteria for semaglutide and underwent CAC scoring on noncontrast cardiac computed tomography.
    Summary · context
    Risk reduction estimates from the SELECT (Semaglutide Effects on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients with Overweight or Obesity) trial (median follow-up: 3.3 years) were applied to observed incidence rates for semaglutide 5-year number-needed-to-treat calculations.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.