Skip to content

Study · Other design · n = 4,749 · 2025

10 results

Cardiovascular outcomes with exenatide in type 2 diabetes according to ejection fraction: The EXSCEL trial.

Neves JS, Leite AR, Mentz RJ, Holman RR, Zannad F, Butler J, Packer M, Ferreira JP

European journal of heart failure9 Oct 2024Cited by 26 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, baseline LVEF modified the exenatide effect on HHF versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, exenatide's effect on heart failure hospitalization versus placebo differed by baseline ejection fraction.

    Outcome
    MixedLVEF interaction for heart failure hospitalization
    Study

    n = 4,749

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    p-interaction
    0.012 p-value
    treatment-by-LVEF interaction for HHF

    Source sentences

    Summary
    LVEF modified the EQW effect on hHF: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-2.43) in participants with LVEF < 40% and HR = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55-1.01) in those with LVEF ≥ 40% (p-interaction = 0.012).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    The main outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  2. 02HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D with LVEF ≥40%, exenatide had an HHF hazard ratio of 0.74 versus placebo, with confidence intervals including no effect.

    In plain wordsIn T2D with higher ejection fraction, exenatide did not significantly change heart failure hospitalization risk versus placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHeart failure hospitalization, LVEF ≥40%
    Study

    n = 4,294

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HHF hazard ratio
    0.74 ratio
    LVEF ≥40%
    95% CI lower
    0.55 ratio
    LVEF ≥40%
    95% CI upper
    1.01 ratio
    LVEF ≥40%

    Source sentences

    Summary
    LVEF modified the EQW effect on hHF: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-2.43) in participants with LVEF < 40% and HR = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55-1.01) in those with LVEF ≥ 40% (p-interaction = 0.012).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    The main outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  3. 03HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D with LVEF <40%, exenatide had an HHF hazard ratio of 1.52 versus placebo, with confidence intervals including no effect.

    In plain wordsIn T2D with low ejection fraction, exenatide did not significantly change heart failure hospitalization risk versus placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHeart failure hospitalization, LVEF <40%
    Study

    n = 455

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HHF hazard ratio
    1.52 ratio
    LVEF <40%
    95% CI lower
    0.95 ratio
    LVEF <40%
    95% CI upper
    2.43 ratio
    LVEF <40%

    Source sentences

    Summary
    LVEF modified the EQW effect on hHF: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-2.43) in participants with LVEF < 40% and HR = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55-1.01) in those with LVEF ≥ 40% (p-interaction = 0.012).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    The main outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  4. 04HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, LVEF did not significantly modify the exenatide effect on MACE versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, exenatide's effect on major cardiovascular events versus placebo did not significantly differ by ejection fraction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLVEF interaction for MACE
    Study

    n = 4,749

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    p-interaction
    > 0.1 p-value
    treatment-by-LVEF interaction for MACE

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant treatment-by-LVEF interactions (p-interaction >0.10) were observed for MACE, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  5. 05HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, LVEF did not significantly modify the exenatide effect on cardiovascular death versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, exenatide's effect on cardiovascular death versus placebo did not significantly differ by ejection fraction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLVEF interaction for cardiovascular death
    Study

    n = 4,749

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    p-interaction
    > 0.1 p-value
    treatment-by-LVEF interaction for cardiovascular death

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant treatment-by-LVEF interactions (p-interaction >0.10) were observed for MACE, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  6. 06HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, LVEF did not significantly modify the exenatide effect on all-cause mortality versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, exenatide's effect on death from any cause versus placebo did not significantly differ by ejection fraction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLVEF interaction for all-cause mortality
    Study

    n = 4,749

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    p-interaction
    > 0.1 p-value
    treatment-by-LVEF interaction for all-cause mortality

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant treatment-by-LVEF interactions (p-interaction >0.10) were observed for MACE, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
    Summary · context
    In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%.
  7. 07HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D with NYHA class I/II, exenatide had an HHF hazard ratio of 0.91 versus placebo, with confidence intervals including no effect.

    In plain wordsIn T2D with NYHA class I/II, exenatide did not significantly change heart failure hospitalization risk versus placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHeart failure hospitalization, NYHA I/II
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HHF hazard ratio
    0.91 ratio
    NYHA class I/II
    95% CI lower
    0.65 ratio
    NYHA class I/II
    95% CI upper
    1.27 ratio
    NYHA class I/II

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The risk of HHF was also modified by baseline NYHA class (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27 for NYHA class I/II; HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.95-3.59 for NYHA class III/IV; p-interaction = 0.062), mostly driven by the LVEF <40% subgroup.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
  8. 08HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D with NYHA class III/IV, exenatide had an HHF hazard ratio of 1.84 versus placebo, with confidence intervals including no effect.

    In plain wordsIn T2D with NYHA class III/IV, exenatide did not significantly change heart failure hospitalization risk versus placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHeart failure hospitalization, NYHA III/IV
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HHF hazard ratio
    1.84 ratio
    NYHA class III/IV
    95% CI lower
    0.95 ratio
    NYHA class III/IV
    95% CI upper
    3.59 ratio
    NYHA class III/IV

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The risk of HHF was also modified by baseline NYHA class (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27 for NYHA class I/II; HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.95-3.59 for NYHA class III/IV; p-interaction = 0.062), mostly driven by the LVEF <40% subgroup.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
  9. 09HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, the reported NYHA interaction for exenatide versus placebo on HHF had p-interaction = 0.062.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, the NYHA interaction test for exenatide versus placebo on heart failure hospitalization had P = 0.062.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedNYHA interaction for heart failure hospitalization
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    p-interaction
    0.062 p-value
    treatment-by-NYHA class interaction for HHF

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The risk of HHF was also modified by baseline NYHA class (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27 for NYHA class I/II; HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.95-3.59 for NYHA class III/IV; p-interaction = 0.062), mostly driven by the LVEF <40% subgroup.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).
  10. 10HumanOther designEfficacy outcome

    In T2D, obesity did not modify the exenatide effect on HHF versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn T2D, exenatide's effect on heart failure hospitalization versus placebo did not differ by obesity.

    Outcome
    No significant changeObesity interaction for heart failure hospitalization
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    once weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Obesity did not modify the effects of EQW on HHF.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.