Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 44 · 2024

5 results

Lanreotide versus placebo for tumour reduction in patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive, clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma (GALANT study): a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Boertien TM, Drent ML, Booij J, Majoie CBLM, Stokkel MPM, Hoogmoed J, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Simsek S, Veldman RG, Weterings AJ, Vink JM, Tanck MWT, Fliers E, Bisschop PH

The Lancet regional health. Europe13 May 2024Cited by 8 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundNo established medical treatment options currently exist for patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma (NFPMA). Somatostatin analogues may prevent tumour growth, but randomised controlled trials are lacking. In vivo somatostatin receptor assessment with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET could help in selecting patients for treatment. We aimed to determine the effect of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide on tumour size in patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA.MethodsThe GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion. Important exclusion criteria were previous sellar radiotherapy and use of dopamine receptor agonists. Somatostatin receptor expression in the NFPMA was determined through 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, co-registered with MRI. A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks. Primary outcome was the change in cranio-caudal tumour diameter measured on pituitary MRI from baseline to end-of-treatment in the intention-to-treat population. Participants, investigators and outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL5136, and EudraCT, 2015-001234-22.FindingsBetween Nov 3, 2015, and Dec 10, 2019, 49 patients were included in the study. Forty-four patients with a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned to lanreotide (22 [50%]) or placebo (22 [50%]). Study treatment was completed in 13 (59%) lanreotide and 19 (86%) placebo participants. The mean (SD) change from baseline in cranio-caudal tumour diameter after treatment was +1·2 (2·5) mm with lanreotide and +1·3 (1·5) mm with placebo; adjusted mean difference versus placebo -0·1 mm (95% CI -1·3 to 1·2, p = 0·93). Adverse events occurred in 22 (100%, 147 events) lanreotide and 21 (95%, 94 events) placebo participants. Gastrointestinal complaints were most common, reported by 18 (82%) lanreotide and 8 (36%) placebo participants. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events.InterpretationCompared with placebo, lanreotide treatment did not reduce tumour size or growth in patients with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-positive NFPMA.FundingIpsen Farmaceutica BV.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In NFPMA patients, mean (SD) diameter change was +1.2 (2.5) mm with lanreotide versus +1.3 (1.5) mm with placebo, adjusted difference -0.1 mm (95% CI -1.3 to 1.2, p = 0.93).

    In plain wordsIn NFPMA patients, lanreotide did not significantly change tumor diameter compared with placebo.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    No significant changeCranio-caudal tumor diameter change
    Study

    n = 44

    Comparator
    placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    120 mg every 28 days · deep subcutaneous injection · 72 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean change in cranio-caudal tumour diameter
    1.2 mm
    lanreotide, change from baseline (SD 2.5)
    SD of change in tumour diameter
    2.5 mm
    lanreotide
    Mean change in cranio-caudal tumour diameter
    1.3 mm
    placebo, change from baseline (SD 1.5)
    SD of change in tumour diameter
    1.5 mm
    placebo
    Adjusted mean difference versus placebo
    −0.1 mm
    lanreotide versus placebo
    95% CI of adjusted mean difference
    −1.3 to 1.2 mm
    lanreotide versus placebo
    P value
    0.93 p
    lanreotide versus placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean (SD) change from baseline in cranio-caudal tumour diameter after treatment was +1·2 (2·5) mm with lanreotide and +1·3 (1·5) mm with placebo; adjusted mean difference versus placebo -0·1 mm (95% CI -1·3 to 1·2, p = 0·93).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
    Summary · context
    Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion.
    Summary · context
    A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialOther

    In NFPMA patients, treatment completion was 13 (59%) with lanreotide versus 19 (86%) with placebo.

    In plain wordsIn NFPMA patients, 13 (59%) completed lanreotide treatment versus 19 (86%) with placebo.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    DecreaseTreatment completion
    Study

    n = 44

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Treatment adherence and retention · Whole body
    Studied dose
    120 mg every 28 days · deep subcutaneous injection · 72 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Treatment completion
    13 participants
    lanreotide
    Treatment completion
    59%
    lanreotide
    Treatment completion
    19 participants
    placebo
    Treatment completion
    86%
    placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Study treatment was completed in 13 (59%) lanreotide and 19 (86%) placebo participants.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
    Summary · context
    Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion.
    Summary · context
    A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In NFPMA patients, adverse events affected 22 (100%, 147 events) with lanreotide versus 21 (95%, 94 events) with placebo.

    In plain wordsIn NFPMA patients, adverse events affected 100% with lanreotide versus 95% with placebo.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    IncreaseAdverse events
    Study

    n = 44

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    120 mg every 28 days · deep subcutaneous injection · 72 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with adverse events
    22 participants
    lanreotide
    Participants with adverse events
    100%
    lanreotide
    Adverse events
    147 events
    lanreotide
    Participants with adverse events
    21 participants
    placebo
    Participants with adverse events
    95%
    placebo
    Adverse events
    94 events
    placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Adverse events occurred in 22 (100%, 147 events) lanreotide and 21 (95%, 94 events) placebo participants.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
    Summary · context
    Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion.
    Summary · context
    A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In NFPMA patients, gastrointestinal complaints affected 18 (82%) with lanreotide versus 8 (36%) with placebo.

    In plain wordsIn NFPMA patients, digestive complaints affected 82% with lanreotide versus 36% with placebo.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal complaints
    Study

    n = 44

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    120 mg every 28 days · deep subcutaneous injection · 72 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Participants with gastrointestinal complaints
    18 participants
    lanreotide
    Participants with gastrointestinal complaints
    82%
    lanreotide
    Participants with gastrointestinal complaints
    8 participants
    placebo
    Participants with gastrointestinal complaints
    36%
    placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal complaints were most common, reported by 18 (82%) lanreotide and 8 (36%) placebo participants.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
    Summary · context
    Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion.
    Summary · context
    A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In NFPMA patients, no treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in the lanreotide-placebo trial.

    In plain wordsIn NFPMA patients, no treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in the lanreotide-placebo trial.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    Not applicableTreatment-related serious adverse events
    Study

    n = 44

    Comparator
    placebo
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    120 mg every 28 days · deep subcutaneous injection · 72 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no treatment-related serious adverse events.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The GALANT study was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial with recruitment at three academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
    Summary · context
    Adult patients with a suprasellar extending NFPMA, either surgery-naïve or postoperative remnant ≥10 mm, were eligible for inclusion.
    Summary · context
    A predefined sample of 44 patients with PET-positive NFPMA were randomly assigned (1:1) to lanreotide acetate 120 mg or placebo, both administered as deep subcutaneous injections every 28 days for 72 weeks.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.