Skip to content

Study · Observational study · n = 90 · 2024

14 results

Changes in body weight and composition, metabolic parameters, and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous semaglutide in real-world clinical practice.

Pantanetti P, Cangelosi G, Alberti S, Di Marco S, Michetti G, Cerasoli G, Di Giacinti M, Coacci S, Francucci N, Petrelli F, Ambrosio G, Grinta R

Frontiers in endocrinology2 Jul 2024Cited by 29 (Europe PMC)

Summary

Subcutaneous once-weekly (ow) semaglutide is a recent treatment option for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, but real-world data on weight loss and associated changes in body composition, nutrients intake, and quality of life are still scarce. This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022. Clinical information was collected after 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) from semaglutide initiation (T0). Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was performed to measure changes in body composition. Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the 36 - items Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered as patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Changes in continuous endpoints (weight, body composition, nutrients intake, other clinical parameters, and PROs) were assessed using mixed models for repeated measurements. Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study. After 6 months from semaglutide initiation, body weight significantly decrease by -4.69 Kg (95%CI -6.19;-3.19) (primary endpoint). After 12 months, body weight was further reduced (-5.38 Kg; 95%CI -7.79;-2.97). At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months. Intake of all nutrients declined in the first 6 months of therapy, although only lipids reduction reached the statistical significance (-6.73 g; p=0.02). Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented. Satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ questionnaire) and mental health (MCS score of SF-36 questionnaire) significantly increased during the follow-up. The study documented real-world benefits of semaglutide for treating obesity in T2D subjects, with important changes on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Loss of lean mass associated with weight loss warrants attention; parallel strategies to preserve skeletal muscle and improve physical function, i.e. nutritional education and structured exercise, are of great importance.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study14

14 results from studies that gave the peptide. 14 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, body weight fell significantly by 4.69 kg after 6 months of subcutaneous semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, body weight was lower after 6 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight change at 6 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −4.69 Kg
    6 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 6 months from semaglutide initiation, body weight significantly decrease by -4.69 Kg (95%CI -6.19;-3.19) (primary endpoint).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, body weight was further reduced, by 5.38 kg, after 12 months of subcutaneous semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, body weight was lower still after 12 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight change at 12 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 12 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −5.38 Kg
    12 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 12 months, body weight was further reduced (-5.38 Kg; 95%CI -7.79;-2.97).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance fell significantly by 2.1 kg after 6 months of semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, body fat was lower after 6 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFat mass change at 6 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body composition · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Fat mass change
    −2.1 Kg
    6 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, fat mass was only slightly reduced versus baseline after 12 months of semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, body fat was only slightly lower after 12 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFat mass change at 12 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body composition · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 12 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  5. 05HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, lean mass fell significantly by over 3 kg at both 6 and 12 months of semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, lean body mass was lower after 6 and 12 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLean mass change at 6 and 12 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body composition · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 6 and 12 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Lean mass change
    > 3 Kg
    6 and 12 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At BIA, fat mass was significantly reduced by 2.1 Kg after 6 months but only slightly reduced after 12 months vs. baseline; lean mass was also significantly reduced by over 3 Kg both at 6 and 12 months.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  6. 06HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, lipid intake fell significantly by 6.73 g in the first 6 months of semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, people ate less fat in the first 6 months of semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLipid intake change in the first 6 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Lipid intake change
    −6.73 g
    6 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Intake of all nutrients declined in the first 6 months of therapy, although only lipids reduction reached the statistical significance (-6.73 g; p=0.02).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  7. 07HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, intake of nutrients other than lipids declined in the first 6 months of semaglutide but not significantly.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, intake of other nutrients fell a little in the first 6 months of semaglutide, but not significantly.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIntake of other nutrients in the first 6 months
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Appetite and food intake · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 6 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Intake of all nutrients declined in the first 6 months of therapy, although only lipids reduction reached the statistical significance (-6.73 g; p=0.02).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  8. 08HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, BMI improved significantly during semaglutide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, BMI improved during semaglutide treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBMI change
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  9. 09HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, waist circumference improved significantly during semaglutide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, waist size improved during semaglutide treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWaist circumference change
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  10. 10HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, glycemic control improved significantly during semaglutide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, blood sugar control improved during semaglutide treatment.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedGlycemic control
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  11. 11HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, blood pressure improved significantly during semaglutide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, blood pressure improved during semaglutide treatment.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedBlood pressure
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Blood pressure · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  12. 12HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, the lipid profile improved significantly during semaglutide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, blood fat levels improved during semaglutide treatment.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedLipid profile
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Statistically significant improvements in BMI, waist circumference, glycemic control, blood pressure and lipid profile were documented.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  13. 13HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, treatment satisfaction measured by the DTSQ increased significantly during semaglutide follow-up.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, satisfaction with treatment rose during semaglutide follow-up.

    Outcome
    IncreaseTreatment satisfaction (DTSQ)
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Mental health and mood
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ questionnaire) and mental health (MCS score of SF-36 questionnaire) significantly increased during the follow-up.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.
  14. 14HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, the SF-36 mental component score increased significantly during semaglutide follow-up.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, a mental health score rose during semaglutide follow-up.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMental health score (SF-36 MCS)
    Study

    n = 90

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Mental health and mood
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Satisfaction with treatment (DTSQ questionnaire) and mental health (MCS score of SF-36 questionnaire) significantly increased during the follow-up.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This observational, prospective clinical study involved all T2D patients starting ow semaglutide according to routine care between December 2021 and February 2022.
    Summary · context
    Overall, 90 patients (age 63.0 ± 10.0 years; diabetes duration 7.6 ± 5.9 years; 58.9% men; HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.1%; weight 95.4 ± 19.4 Kg, BMI 34.6 ± 6.4 Kg/m2; 36.7% naïve to diabetes treatment, 43.3% on metformin, 10.0% on dual oral therapy, and 10.0% treated with schemes including insulin) were included in the study.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.