Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2024

4 results

Semaglutide vs Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss.

Haseeb M, Chhatwal J, Xiao J, Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC

JAMA network open1 Apr 2024Cited by 58 (Europe PMC)

Summary

ImportanceObesity is a disease with a large socioeconomic burden. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric procedure with wide global adoption. More recently, new weight-loss medications, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (eg, semaglutide), have attracted increased attention due to their efficacy. However, their cost-effectiveness over an extended period compared with ESG is a critical gap that needs to be better explored for informed health care decision-making.ObjectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide compared with ESG over 5 years for individuals with class II obesity.Design, setting, and participantsThis economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy. The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9). The base case was a 45-year-old patient with class II obesity (BMI of 37). Patients undergoing ESG were subjected to risks of perioperative mortality and adverse events with resultant costs and decrement in quality of life.InterventionsStrategies included treatment with semaglutide and ESG.Main outcomes and measuresCosts (2022 US dollars), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A 5-year time horizon with a cycle length of 1 month with a 3% discount rate was used. Probabilities, costs, and quality-of-life estimates of the model were derived from published literature. One-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed.ResultsThe model found that ESG was more cost-effective than semaglutide over a 5-year time horizon, with an ICER of -$595 532/QALY. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty added 0.06 QALYs and reduced total cost by $33 583 relative to semaglutide. The results remained robust on 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty sustained greater weight loss over 5 years vs semaglutide (BMI of 31.7 vs 33.0). To achieve nondominance, the annual price of semaglutide, currently $13 618, would need to be $3591.Conclusions and relevanceThis study suggests that ESG is cost saving compared with semaglutide in the treatment of class II obesity. On price threshold analyses, a 3-fold decrease in the price of semaglutide is needed to achieve nondominance.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study4

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 01Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model of adults with class II obesity, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty was more cost-effective than semaglutide over 5 years (ICER -$595 532/QALY).

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of class II obesity treatment, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty cost less per health gain than semaglutide over 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicableIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ESG versus semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Markov cohort model, 5-year horizon
    Comparator
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The model found that ESG was more cost-effective than semaglutide over a 5-year time horizon, with an ICER of -$595 532/QALY.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy.
    Summary · context
    The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 02Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model of adults with class II obesity, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty added 0.06 QALYs and reduced total cost by $33 583 relative to semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty gave slightly more healthy life years and cost less than semaglutide over 5 years.

    Outcome
    Not applicableQALYs and total cost, ESG relative to semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Markov cohort model, 5-year horizon
    Comparator
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    QALY difference
    0.06 QALYs
    ESG vs semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty added 0.06 QALYs and reduced total cost by $33 583 relative to semaglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy.
    Summary · context
    The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 03Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoEfficacy outcome

    In a model of adults with class II obesity, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty sustained greater weight loss over 5 years than semaglutide (BMI 31.7 vs 33.0).

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty kept more weight off over 5 years than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableModelled BMI at 5 years
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Markov cohort model, 5-year horizon
    Comparator
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    BMI at 5 years
    31.7
    ESG
    BMI at 5 years
    33
    semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty sustained greater weight loss over 5 years vs semaglutide (BMI of 31.7 vs 33.0).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy.
    Summary · context
    The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 04Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a model of adults with class II obesity, the annual semaglutide price of $13 618 would need to fall to $3591 to achieve nondominance.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model, the yearly price of semaglutide would need to fall from $13 618 to $3591 to match endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty.

    Outcome
    Not applicablePrice threshold for nondominance
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Markov cohort model, 5-year horizon
    Comparator
    Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    To achieve nondominance, the annual price of semaglutide, currently $13 618, would need to be $3591.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This economic evaluation study, conducted from September 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, used a Markov cohort model to compare ESG and semaglutide, with a no-treatment baseline strategy.
    Summary · context
    The study comprised adult patients in the US health care system with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI] of 35-39.9).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.