Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2024

7 results

Effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Xia W, Yu H, Lei X, Wen P

Medicine1 Mar 2024Cited by 7 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

7 results from studies that gave the peptide. 7 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide improved the heart's pumping fraction compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    IncreaseLeft ventricular ejection fraction
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −0.38 SMD
    left ventricular ejection fraction

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Results revealed that liraglutide exhibited significant enhancements in left ventricular ejection fraction [SMD = -0.38, 95%CI(-0.70, -0.06), P = .02]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide significantly improved cardiac index versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide improved cardiac index compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCardiac index
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −1.05 SMD
    cardiac index

    Source sentences

    Summary
    cardiac index [SMD = -1.05, 95%CI(-1.52, -0.59), P < .0001]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  3. 03HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide significantly improved stroke volume versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide improved stroke volume compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    IncreaseStroke volume
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −0.67 SMD
    stroke volume

    Source sentences

    Summary
    stroke volume [SMD = -0.67, 95%CI(-1.02, -0.32), P = .0002]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  4. 04HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide significantly improved the early to late diastolic filling velocity ratio versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide improved a heart filling measure compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEarly diastolic filling velocity/late atrial filling velocity ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −0.52 SMD
    early diastolic filling velocity/late atrial filling velocity ratio

    Source sentences

    Summary
    early diastolic filling velocity/late atrial filling velocity ratio [SMD = -0.52, 95%CI(-0.82, -0.22), P = .0006]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  5. 05HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide had no statistically significant effect on cardiac output versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide did not significantly change cardiac output compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCardiac output
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −0.2 SMD
    cardiac output

    Source sentences

    Summary
    no statistically significant impact on cardiac output [SMD = -0.20, 95%CI(-0.53, 0.14), P = .26]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  6. 06HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide had no statistically significant effect on the E/Ea ratio versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide did not significantly change a heart filling-pressure measure compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    No significant changeE/Ea ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    −0.34 SMD
    E/Ea ratio

    Source sentences

    Summary
    early diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic annular velocity (E/Ea) ratio [SMD = -0.34, 95%CI(-0.75, 0.06), P = .10]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.
  7. 07HumanSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide had no statistically significant effect on the early diastolic filling velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio versus placebo in a meta-analysis.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide did not significantly change another heart filling measure compared with placebo in a pooled analysis of trials.

    Outcome
    No significant changeEarly diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    SMD
    0.21 SMD
    early diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity ratio

    Source sentences

    Summary
    early diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity ratio [SMD = 0.21, 95%CI(-0.15, 0.56), P = .25]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We identified double-blind randomized trials assessing the effects of liraglutide compared to placebo on cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    The meta-analysis encompassed 5 RCTs including 220 participants.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.