Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2024

9 results

Metabolic Abnormalities Following Tirzepatide Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase 3 SURPASS J-mono Post Hoc Analysis.

Onishi Y, Oura T, Takeuchi M

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders4 Feb 2024Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced lower composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than dulaglutide at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced fewer composite metabolic abnormalities than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    31.7%
    Tirzepatide 5 mg at week 52
    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced lower composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than dulaglutide at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced fewer composite metabolic abnormalities than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    10 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    23%
    Tirzepatide 10 mg at week 52
    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced lower composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than dulaglutide at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, tirzepatide produced fewer composite metabolic abnormalities than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    15 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    14.2%
    Tirzepatide 15 mg at week 52
    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced higher composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than tirzepatide 5 mg at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced more composite metabolic abnormalities than tirzepatide 5 mg.

    Outcome
    IncreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Tirzepatide 5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced higher composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than tirzepatide 10 mg at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced more composite metabolic abnormalities than tirzepatide 10 mg.

    Outcome
    IncreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Tirzepatide 10 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced higher composite metabolic abnormality prevalence than tirzepatide 15 mg at week 52.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide produced more composite metabolic abnormalities than tirzepatide 15 mg.

    Outcome
    IncreaseComposite metabolic abnormality prevalence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Tirzepatide 15 mg
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint prevalence
    56.5%
    Dulaglutide at week 52

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At week 52, the proportion of participants on treatment that met the composite endpoint was 31.7%, 23.0%, and 14.2% in the tirzepatide 5-, 10-, and 15-mg arms, respectively, and 56.5% in the dulaglutide arm (p < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, composite metabolic abnormality prevalence decreased across all BMI subgroups treated with tirzepatide.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, composite metabolic abnormalities decreased from baseline across all BMI groups treated with tirzepatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseComposite endpoint across BMI subgroups
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5, 10, and 15 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    with reductions observed across all BMI subgroups treated with tirzepatide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, individual metabolic abnormalities showed trends similar to the composite endpoint, favoring tirzepatide over dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, individual metabolic abnormality trends favored tirzepatide over dulaglutide, like the composite endpoint.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIndividual metabolic abnormality trends
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    5, 10, and 15 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The proportion of participants with individual metabolic abnormalities showed similar trends to those observed for the composite endpoint.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Tirzepatide was consistently superior to dulaglutide across all assessments.
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In Japanese patients with T2D, individual metabolic abnormalities were more prevalent with dulaglutide than with tirzepatide, as with the composite endpoint.

    In plain wordsIn Japanese patients with T2D, dulaglutide had less favorable individual metabolic abnormality trends than tirzepatide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIndividual metabolic abnormality trends
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Tirzepatide
    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The proportion of participants with individual metabolic abnormalities showed similar trends to those observed for the composite endpoint.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Tirzepatide was consistently superior to dulaglutide across all assessments.
    Summary · context
    This was a post hoc analysis of SURPASS J-mono, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy (5, 10, and 15 mg) to dulaglutide 0.75 mg in Japanese patients with T2D.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT03861052

A Study of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Compared to Dulaglutide in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes

Eli Lilly and Companyn = 6367 May 2019 to 31 Mar 2021

Type 2 Diabetes

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 14 Apr 2022

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:25 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:07 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.