Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 7,633 · 2024

3 results

Proportion of participants with type 2 diabetes achieving a metabolic composite endpoint with once-weekly semaglutide treatment versus comparators: Post hoc pooled analysis from SUSTAIN 1-5, 7-10 and SUSTAIN China.

Ji L, Ahmann AJ, Ahrén B, Capehorn MS, Hu P, Lingvay I, Liu W, Rodbard HW, Shen Z, Sorli C

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism12 Oct 2023Cited by 6 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study3

3 results from studies that gave the peptide. 3 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, more participants reached the metabolic composite endpoint with pooled semaglutide doses than with comparators (29.1% vs 11.4%).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, more people reached the combined HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol goal on semaglutide than on comparators.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMetabolic composite endpoint, semaglutide doses pooled
    Study

    n = 7,633

    Comparator
    Comparators (pooled)
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.5 or 1.0 mg once weekly · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint proportion
    29.1%
    semaglutide pooled
    Composite endpoint proportion
    11.4%
    comparators

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Likewise, when the OW SC semaglutide doses were pooled, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving semaglutide achieved the composite metabolic endpoint versus comparators (29.1% vs. 11.4%, respectively; p < .0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Using patient-level data pooled by treatment, proportions of participants achieving the metabolic composite endpoint, defined as glycated haemoglobin <7% (<53 mmol/mol), blood pressure <140/90 mmHg and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dl (<3.37 mmol/L), were evaluated following baseline adjustments.
    Summary · context
    Participants with T2D (aged ≥18 years) and glycated haemoglobin ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) who had been randomized to OW SC semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or comparator in addition to background medication.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, more participants reached the metabolic composite endpoint with semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly than with comparators (23.7% vs 11.5%).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, more people reached the combined HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol goal on semaglutide 0.5 mg than on comparators.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMetabolic composite endpoint, semaglutide 0.5 mg
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Comparators (pooled)
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.5 mg once weekly · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint proportion
    23.7%
    semaglutide 0.5 mg
    Composite endpoint proportion
    11.5%
    comparators

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The proportion of participants who achieved the metabolic composite endpoint was significantly higher with OW SC semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus comparators (23.7% and 32.0% vs. 11.5%, respectively; p < .0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Using patient-level data pooled by treatment, proportions of participants achieving the metabolic composite endpoint, defined as glycated haemoglobin <7% (<53 mmol/mol), blood pressure <140/90 mmHg and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dl (<3.37 mmol/L), were evaluated following baseline adjustments.
    Summary · context
    Participants with T2D (aged ≥18 years) and glycated haemoglobin ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) who had been randomized to OW SC semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or comparator in addition to background medication.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, more participants reached the metabolic composite endpoint with semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly than with comparators (32.0% vs 11.5%).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, more people reached the combined HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol goal on semaglutide 1.0 mg than on comparators.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMetabolic composite endpoint, semaglutide 1.0 mg
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Comparators (pooled)
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.0 mg once weekly · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Composite endpoint proportion
    32%
    semaglutide 1.0 mg
    Composite endpoint proportion
    11.5%
    comparators

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The proportion of participants who achieved the metabolic composite endpoint was significantly higher with OW SC semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus comparators (23.7% and 32.0% vs. 11.5%, respectively; p < .0001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Using patient-level data pooled by treatment, proportions of participants achieving the metabolic composite endpoint, defined as glycated haemoglobin <7% (<53 mmol/mol), blood pressure <140/90 mmHg and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dl (<3.37 mmol/L), were evaluated following baseline adjustments.
    Summary · context
    Participants with T2D (aged ≥18 years) and glycated haemoglobin ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) who had been randomized to OW SC semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) or comparator in addition to background medication.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    11 Oct 2026, 00:04 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.