Skip to content

Study · Observational study · n = 94 · 2023

15 results

Differences in weight loss and safety between the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A non-randomized multicenter study from the titration phase.

Seijas-Amigo J, Salgado-Barreira Á, Castelo-Dominguez R, Pérez-Álvarez MT, Ponce-Piñón B, Fernández-Silva M, Rodríguez-Barreiro M, Pereira-Pía M, Iglesias-Moreno JM, Gago-García M, Montáns-García R, Fernandez-Perez A and 7 more

Show all authors

FragaGayoso D, Fernandez-Montenegro M, Riveiro-Barciela B, Rilla-Villar N, Cordero A, RodríguezMañero M, González-Juanatey JR

Primary care diabetes23 May 2023Cited by 6 (Europe PMC)

Summary

IntroductionObesity increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Weight loss (≥5 %) reduces the risk of CVD. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RA) have shown clinically weight loss.Objectives1) To assess differences in the efficacy of weight loss and HbA1c; 2) to evaluate the safety and adherence during the titration phase.MethodsIt is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients. The primary end point was the weight loss (≥5 %). Changes in weight, BMI and HbA1c were also calculated as co-primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were safety, adherence, and tolerance.ResultsAmong 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide. 45 % female and the mean age was 62. Baseline characteristics were body weight 99.3 kg, BMI 36.7 kg/m2 and Hba1c 8.2 %. Oral semaglutide achieved the highest reduction: 61.1 % of patients achieving ≥ 5 %, subcutaneous semaglutide 45.8 % and dulaglutide 40.6 %. GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %). 62 % of patients on dulaglutide, 25 % on oral semaglutide and 22 % on subcutaneous semaglutide.ConclusionsOral semaglutide achieved the highest proportion of patients that lost ≥ 5 %. GLP1 RA significantly reduced BMI and HbA1c. Most of the reported adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders and they were reported in a major frequency in the dulaglutide group. Oral semaglutide would be a reasonable switch in case of future shortages.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study15

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, 61.1 % of patients on oral semaglutide lost 5 % or more of body weight during titration, the highest proportion compared with subcutaneous semaglutide and dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, oral semaglutide had the highest share losing 5 % of body weight, versus injected semaglutide and dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight loss of 5 % or more, oral semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oralAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with weight loss >=5 %
    61.1%
    oral semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral semaglutide achieved the highest reduction: 61.1 % of patients achieving ≥ 5 %, subcutaneous semaglutide 45.8 % and dulaglutide 40.6 %.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, 45.8 % of patients on subcutaneous semaglutide lost 5 % or more of body weight during titration, compared with 40.6 % on dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, 45.8 % on injected semaglutide lost 5 % of body weight, compared with 40.6 % on dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight loss of 5 % or more, subcutaneous semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with weight loss >=5 %
    45.8%
    subcutaneous semaglutide
    Patients with weight loss >=5 %
    40.6%
    dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral semaglutide achieved the highest reduction: 61.1 % of patients achieving ≥ 5 %, subcutaneous semaglutide 45.8 % and dulaglutide 40.6 %.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, dulaglutide was linked to a lower proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss than oral semaglutide.

    In plain wordsDulaglutide was linked to fewer patients losing at least 5% of weight than oral semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight loss of at least 5%
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Oral semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Patients achieving at least 5% weight loss
    40.6%
    Dulaglutide
    Patients achieving at least 5% weight loss
    61.1%
    Oral semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral semaglutide achieved the highest reduction: 61.1 % of patients achieving ≥ 5 %, subcutaneous semaglutide 45.8 % and dulaglutide 40.6 %.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, dulaglutide was linked to a lower proportion achieving at least 5% weight loss than subcutaneous semaglutide.

    In plain wordsDulaglutide was linked to fewer patients losing at least 5% of weight than subcutaneous semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight loss of at least 5%
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Subcutaneous semaglutide
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Patients achieving at least 5% weight loss
    40.6%
    Dulaglutide
    Patients achieving at least 5% weight loss
    45.8%
    Subcutaneous semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Oral semaglutide achieved the highest reduction: 61.1 % of patients achieving ≥ 5 %, subcutaneous semaglutide 45.8 % and dulaglutide 40.6 %.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  5. 05HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, 25 % of patients on oral semaglutide reported gastrointestinal events during titration, compared with 62 % on dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, 25 % on oral semaglutide reported stomach or bowel events, compared with 62 % on dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseGastrointestinal adverse events, oral semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · oralAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal events
    25%
    oral semaglutide
    Gastrointestinal events
    62%
    dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %). 62 % of patients on dulaglutide, 25 % on oral semaglutide and 22 % on subcutaneous semaglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  6. 06HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, 22 % of patients on subcutaneous semaglutide reported gastrointestinal events during titration, compared with 62 % on dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, 22 % on injected semaglutide reported stomach or bowel events, compared with 62 % on dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseGastrointestinal adverse events, subcutaneous semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal events
    22%
    subcutaneous semaglutide
    Gastrointestinal events
    62%
    dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %). 62 % of patients on dulaglutide, 25 % on oral semaglutide and 22 % on subcutaneous semaglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  7. 07HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, dulaglutide was linked to more gastrointestinal disorders than oral semaglutide.

    In plain wordsDulaglutide was linked to more gastrointestinal disorders than oral semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal disorders
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Oral semaglutide
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal disorders
    62%
    Dulaglutide
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    25%
    Oral semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    62 % of patients on dulaglutide, 25 % on oral semaglutide and 22 % on subcutaneous semaglutide.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %).
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  8. 08HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, dulaglutide was linked to more gastrointestinal disorders than subcutaneous semaglutide.

    In plain wordsDulaglutide was linked to more gastrointestinal disorders than subcutaneous semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseGastrointestinal disorders
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Subcutaneous semaglutide
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal disorders
    62%
    Dulaglutide
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    22%
    Subcutaneous semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    62 % of patients on dulaglutide, 25 % on oral semaglutide and 22 % on subcutaneous semaglutide.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %).
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.
  9. 09HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, weight and BMI reductions did not differ significantly between the dulaglutide, subcutaneous semaglutide and oral semaglutide groups.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, weight and BMI reductions were similar across dulaglutide and the two semaglutide forms.

    Outcome
    No significant changeWeight and BMI difference between GLP1 RA groups
    Study

    n = 94

    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 10HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, pooled GLP1 receptor agonists (dulaglutide and semaglutide) significantly reduced body weight by 4.95 kg during titration.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, the pooled group of GLP1 drugs lowered body weight by about 5 kg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight change, pooled GLP1 RA
    Study

    n = 94

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Body weight change
    −4.95 kg
    pooled GLP1 RA

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 11HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, pooled GLP1 receptor agonists significantly reduced BMI by 1.86 kg/m2 during titration.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, the pooled group of GLP1 drugs lowered BMI.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBMI change, pooled GLP1 RA
    Study

    n = 94

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    BMI change
    −1.86 kg/m2
    pooled GLP1 RA

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 12HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, pooled GLP1 RA treatment, including dulaglutide, was linked to lower body weight without significant between-drug differences.

    In plain wordsPooled GLP1 RA treatment was linked to weight loss from baseline, with no significant differences between drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight
    Study

    n = 94

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −4.95 kg
    Pooled GLP1 RA treatment

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  4. 13HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, pooled GLP1 RA treatment, including dulaglutide, was linked to lower BMI without significant between-drug differences.

    In plain wordsPooled GLP1 RA treatment was linked to lower BMI than baseline, with no significant differences between drugs.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBMI
    Study

    n = 94

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    BMI change
    −1.86 kg/m2
    Pooled GLP1 RA treatment

    Source sentences

    Summary
    GLP1 RA significantly reduced body weight (-4.95 kg, p 2, p < 0.001), without significant differences between groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  5. 14HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA naive adults, gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %) across pooled GLP1 receptor agonists during titration.

    In plain wordsIn adults starting this drug class, stomach and bowel problems were the most common side effects across the pooled GLP1 drugs.

    Outcome
    Not applicableGastrointestinal adverse events, pooled GLP1 RA
    Study

    n = 94

    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal disorders
    74.5%
    pooled GLP1 RA

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  6. 15HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In GLP1 RA-naive patients, gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events during pooled GLP1 RA treatment, including dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsDuring pooled GLP1 RA treatment, gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events.

    Outcome
    Not applicableGastrointestinal disorders
    Study

    n = 94

    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal disorders
    74.5%
    Pooled treatment

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported events (74.5 %).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    It is a multicenter, prospective, and observational study on GLP1 RA naïve patients.
    Summary · context
    Among 94 subjects, 42.4 % received dulaglutide, 29,3 % subcutaneous semaglutide, 22,8 % oral semaglutide.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 4 to 9Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    The same notice was added 6 times, first on 22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study results updated

  2. Version 3

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 2

    11 Oct 2026, 00:50 UTC

    Study results updated

  4. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.