Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 239 · 2023

10 results

Weekly somapacitan had no adverse effects on glucose metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency.

Takahashi Y, Biller BMK, Fukuoka H, Ho KKY, Rasmussen MH, Nedjatian N, Sværke C, Yuen KCJ, Johannsson G

Pituitary15 Nov 2022Cited by 12 (Europe PMC)

Summary

PurposeThe long-term effects of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) analogues on glucose metabolism in adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) are not known. We investigated the impact of LAGH somapacitan, administered once-weekly, on glucose metabolism in patients with AGHD.MethodsIn post hoc-defined analyses, we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).ResultsNo new cases of diabetes mellitus were reported with somapacitan. Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks. HbA1c and HOMA-β did not differ between groups at either timepoint. Among treatment-naïve patients, sex, age, fasting insulin, glucose tolerance status and body mass index did not influence changes in glucose metabolism. In previously treated patients (REAL 1 extension: n = 51 somapacitan, n = 52 daily GH; REAL 2: n = 61 and n = 31, respectively; REAL Japan: n = 46 and n = 16, respectively), the difference in changes from baseline were not statistically significant between somapacitan and daily GH for any glucose metabolism parameters.ConclusionsSomapacitan, compared with daily GH, did not adversely affect glucose metabolism up to 86 weeks in a large cohort of treatment-naïve or previously treated patients with AGHD. Trial registrations (date of registration): NCT02229851 (2 September 2014), NCT02382939 (3 March 2015), NCT03075644 (7 March 2017).
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study10

10 results from studies that gave the peptide. 10 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, somapacitan produced a smaller FPG change than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, blood sugar changed less with somapacitan than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFPG change at 34 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, somapacitan produced a smaller HOMA-IR change than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, insulin resistance changed less with somapacitan than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHOMA-IR change at 34 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, somapacitan produced a smaller fasting insulin change than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, fasting insulin changed less with somapacitan than daily GH at 34 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFasting insulin change at 34 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, a higher FPG change with daily GH than with somapacitan was not observed at 86 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, daily GH did not show a higher blood sugar change than somapacitan at 86 weeks.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFPG change at 86 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, a higher HOMA-IR change with daily GH than with somapacitan was not observed at 86 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, daily GH did not show a higher insulin resistance change than somapacitan at 86 weeks.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHOMA-IR change at 86 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, a higher fasting insulin change with daily GH than with somapacitan was not observed at 86 weeks.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, daily GH did not show a higher fasting insulin change than somapacitan at 86 weeks.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFasting insulin change at 86 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, HbA1c did not differ between somapacitan and daily GH at either timepoint.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, HbA1c was similar with somapacitan and daily GH at both timepoints.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c at 34 and 86 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA1c and HOMA-β did not differ between groups at either timepoint.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In GH-naïve adults, HOMA-β did not differ between somapacitan and daily GH at either timepoint.

    In plain wordsIn GH-naïve adults, beta-cell function was similar with somapacitan and daily GH at both timepoints.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHOMA-β at 34 and 86 weeks
    Study

    n = 239

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA1c and HOMA-β did not differ between groups at either timepoint.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks.
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In previously treated adults, glucose metabolism changes did not differ significantly between somapacitan and daily GH.

    In plain wordsIn previously treated adults, glucose metabolism changes were similar with somapacitan and daily GH.

    Outcome
    No significant changeGlucose metabolism parameters in previously treated patients
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Daily GH
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In previously treated patients (REAL 1 extension: n = 51 somapacitan, n = 52 daily GH; REAL 2: n = 61 and n = 31, respectively; REAL Japan: n = 46 and n = 16, respectively), the difference in changes from baseline were not statistically significant between somapacitan and daily GH for any glucose metabolism parameters.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).
  10. 10HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In adults with GH deficiency, no new diabetes cases occurred with somapacitan.

    In plain wordsIn adults with GH deficiency, no new diabetes cases occurred with somapacitan.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNew diabetes mellitus
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No new cases of diabetes mellitus were reported with somapacitan.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials3

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

3 trials · 3 completed · 3 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT03075644

A Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Once Weekly Dosing of Somapacitan (NNC0195-0092) and Daily Norditropin® FlexPro® for 52 Weeks in Previously Human Growth Hormone Treated Japanese Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 623 Mar 2017 to 4 Oct 2018

Growth Hormone Disorder · Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 23 Nov 2020
CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT02382939

A Trial to Compare the Safety of Once Weekly Dosing of Somapacitan With Daily Norditropin® FlexPro® for 26 Weeks in Previously Human Growth Hormone Treated Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 9212 Feb 2015 to 4 Jan 2016

Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency · Growth Hormone Disorder

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT02229851

Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NNC0195-0092 (Somapacitan) With Placebo and Norditropin® FlexPro® (Somatropin) in Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 30131 Oct 2014 to 7 May 2018

Growth Hormone Disorder · Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 23 Nov 2020

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.