Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2022

4 results

Short-Term Effectiveness and Reduction in Insulin Requirements in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With IdegLira in a Real-World Setting.

Ramírez-Rincón A, Builes-Montaño CE, Hincapié-García JA, Blanco VM, Botero-Arango JF

Frontiers in endocrinology28 Apr 2022Cited by 6 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, highly prevalent disease with a significant impact on health. Appropriate treatment requires effective and timely escalation to achieve metabolic control. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IDegLira on adults with T2DM previously treated with oral antidiabetics and/or insulin in a real-life setting.MethodsAn observational study in a real-world setting was conducted. Patients were selected from the outpatient clinic of two centers dedicated to specialized diabetes care. Main outcomes were HbA1c, body weight, insulin dose changes, hypoglycemia, and other adverse events.Results67 T2DM patients treated with IDegLira were monitored between 3 and 7 months. At the end of foll ow-up, the median change in HbA1c was -1.05% (CI95% -1.45, -0.65), and a decrease in insulin requirement was also observed (mean difference -10 TDD units (CI95% - 17 to -2.5). No treatment discontinuation was reported, hypoglycemia events were reported in 3 patients at the end of follow-up versus 8 patients at baseline.ConclusionsThis real-life study shows the effectiveness in glycemic control of IDegLira use in T2DM patients who do not achieve goals with other therapies, with an adequate safety profile. The findings need to be confirmed with evaluation of therapeutic results in larger cohorts.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study4

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, the fixed-dose combination IDegLira (insulin degludec/liraglutide) was followed by a median HbA1c change of -1.05% after 3 to 7 months.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c fell after treatment with the combination product IDegLira in routine care.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change at end of follow-up
    Study

    n = 67

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Median HbA1c change
    −1.05%
    end of follow-up

    Source sentences

    Summary
    the median change in HbA1c was -1.05% (CI95% -1.45, -0.65)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    67 T2DM patients treated with IDegLira were monitored between 3 and 7 months.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, insulin requirement fell (mean difference -10 total daily dose units) after treatment with the fixed-dose combination IDegLira.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, the insulin dose needed fell after treatment with the combination product IDegLira.

    Outcome
    DecreaseInsulin requirement change
    Study

    n = 67

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Mean difference in total daily dose
    −10 units
    end of follow-up

    Source sentences

    Summary
    a decrease in insulin requirement was also observed (mean difference -10 TDD units (CI95% - 17 to -2.5).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    67 T2DM patients treated with IDegLira were monitored between 3 and 7 months.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, no treatment discontinuation was reported with the fixed-dose combination IDegLira.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, nobody stopped the combination product IDegLira during follow-up.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTreatment discontinuation
    Study

    n = 67

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No treatment discontinuation was reported, hypoglycemia events were reported in 3 patients at the end of follow-up versus 8 patients at baseline.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    67 T2DM patients treated with IDegLira were monitored between 3 and 7 months.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  4. 04HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in routine care, hypoglycemia events occurred in 3 patients at the end of follow-up versus 8 patients at baseline with IDegLira treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, fewer people had low blood sugar events after treatment with the combination product IDegLira than at baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHypoglycemia events
    Study

    n = 67

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No treatment discontinuation was reported, hypoglycemia events were reported in 3 patients at the end of follow-up versus 8 patients at baseline.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    67 T2DM patients treated with IDegLira were monitored between 3 and 7 months.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.