Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 163 · 2022

5 results

Single-administered GnRH agonist as luteal phase support in insemination cycles: a randomized controlled trial.

Leppänen R, Tinkanen H, Huhtala H, Ahinko K

Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology24 Mar 2022Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients undergoing IUI, live birth rates did not significantly differ with triptorelin versus no luteal support (7.9 versus 12.1%).

    In plain wordsIn patients undergoing IUI, live birth rates did not differ significantly with triptorelin versus no luteal support.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLive birth rate
    Study

    n = 163

    Comparator
    No luteal phase support
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Live birth rate
    7.9%
    triptorelin group
    Live birth rate
    12.1%
    control group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall, the live birth rate was lower in the triptorelin group compared to the control group (7.9 vs. 12.1%; p = .297).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
    Summary · context
    In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
    Summary · context
    In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients undergoing IUI, clinical pregnancy rates were 12.6% with triptorelin versus 13.7% without luteal support.

    In plain wordsIn patients undergoing IUI, clinical pregnancy rates were 12.6% with triptorelin versus 13.7% without luteal support.

    Outcome
    DecreaseClinical pregnancy rate
    Study

    n = 163

    Comparator
    No luteal phase support
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Clinical pregnancy rate
    12.6%
    triptorelin group
    Clinical pregnancy rate
    13.7%
    control group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The clinical pregnancy rates were 12.6 and 13.7%, respectively.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
    Summary · context
    In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
    Summary · context
    In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients undergoing IUI, miscarriages occurred in 2.4% with triptorelin and none without luteal support.

    In plain wordsIn patients undergoing IUI, miscarriages occurred in 2.4% with triptorelin and none without luteal support.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMiscarriage rate
    Study

    n = 163

    Comparator
    No luteal phase support
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Miscarriage rate
    2.4%
    triptorelin group
    Miscarriage rate
    0%
    control group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were 2.4% miscarriages in the triptorelin group and no miscarriages in the control group.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
    Summary · context
    In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
    Summary · context
    In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In letrozole-stimulated IUI cycles, live birth rates were lower with triptorelin versus no luteal support (0 versus 14.7%).

    In plain wordsIn letrozole-stimulated IUI cycles, live birth rates were lower with triptorelin than without luteal support.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLive birth rate with letrozole stimulation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No luteal phase support
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Live birth rate
    0%
    triptorelin group, letrozole stimulation
    Live birth rate
    14.7%
    control group, letrozole stimulation

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Ovarian stimulation with letrozole was associated with lower LBR among the triptorelin group, in comparison to the control group (0 vs. 14.7%, p = .020).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
    Summary · context
    In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
    Summary · context
    In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In IUI cycles stimulated with letrozole and gonadotrophin, live birth rates did not significantly differ with triptorelin versus control (15.9 versus 8.3%).

    In plain wordsIn IUI cycles with letrozole and gonadotrophin, live birth rates did not differ significantly with triptorelin versus no luteal support.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLive birth rate with letrozole and gonadotrophin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    No luteal phase support
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
    Studied dose
    0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Live birth rate
    15.9%
    triptorelin group, letrozole plus gonadotrophin
    Live birth rate
    8.3%
    control group, letrozole plus gonadotrophin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In contrast, when gonadotrophin was added to the letrozole, LBR was almost doubled compared to the control group (15.9 vs. 8.3%, p = .341).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
    Summary · context
    In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
    Summary · context
    In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.