In patients undergoing IUI, live birth rates did not significantly differ with triptorelin versus no luteal support (7.9 versus 12.1%).
In plain wordsIn patients undergoing IUI, live birth rates did not differ significantly with triptorelin versus no luteal support.
- Outcome
- No significant changeLive birth rate
- Study
n = 163
- Comparator
- No luteal phase support
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
- Studied dose
- 0.1 mg once · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Live birth rate
- 7.9%
- triptorelin group
- Live birth rate
- 12.1%
- control group
Source sentences
Overall, the live birth rate was lower in the triptorelin group compared to the control group (7.9 vs. 12.1%; p = .297).
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
Altogether 251 IUI cycles in 163 patients were randomized to triptorelin and a control group between January 2017 and April 2019.
In the triptorelin group, the participants had a single administration of a subcutaneous GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg at the time of implantation.
In the control group, there was no luteal phase support.