Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · 2022

3 results

Circulating tumour cells and tumour biomarkers in functional midgut neuroendocrine tumours.

Meyer T, Caplin M, Khan MS, Toumpanakis C, Shetty S, Ramage JK, Houchard A, Higgs K, Shah T

Journal of neuroendocrinology7 Feb 2022Cited by 16 (Europe PMC)

Summary

CALM-NET was a phase IV exploratory study in the UK that aimed to evaluate if the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) at baseline predicted symptomatic response in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) treated with lanreotide autogel (LAN). Adults with functional, well/moderately differentiated (Ki-67 <20%) midgut NETs received LAN 120 mg/28 days for 1 year. CTCs were present in blood if enumeration was >0. Primary endpoint was the clinical value of baseline CTCs to predict symptomatic response (decrease in diarrhoea or flushing of ≥50% frequency, or ≥1 severity level). Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and correlations between plasma and urinary biomarkers (including 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid [5-HIAA]). Fifty patients were enrolled; 40 completed the study. Baseline CTCs were present in 22 (45.8%) patients (missing baseline CTC status n = 2). Overall, 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.9; 94.5) of patients had a symptomatic response; a 5.9-fold higher odds of symptomatic response in patients without CTC versus patients with CTC at baseline was observed, although this was not statistically significant (odds ratio: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.02; 1.65], p = .126). One-year PFS rate was 66.4% (95% CI: 48.8; 79.2). Biomarker concentrations did not correlate to baseline CTC status. However, there was a strong correlation between plasma and urinary 5-HIAA (Spearman correlation coefficients ≥0.87 [p < .001], all time points). In conclusion, patients without CTC at baseline may be more likely to achieve a symptomatic response following LAN treatment than patients with CTC. Plasma 5-HIAA correlated with urinary 5-HIAA during LAN treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02075606.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study3

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In functional midgut NET patients receiving lanreotide, 87.5% (95% CI 73.9; 94.5) had a symptomatic response.

    In plain wordsIn functional midgut NET patients receiving lanreotide, 87.5% had a symptomatic response.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    Not applicableSymptomatic response
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Cancer
    Studied dose
    120 mg/28 days · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Symptomatic response rate
    87.5%
    all patients receiving lanreotide
    95% CI of symptomatic response rate
    73.9 to 94.5%
    all patients receiving lanreotide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Overall, 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.9; 94.5) of patients had a symptomatic response;
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    CALM-NET was a phase IV exploratory study in the UK that aimed to evaluate if the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) at baseline predicted symptomatic response in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) treated with lanreotide autogel (LAN).
    Summary · context
    Adults with functional, well/moderately differentiated (Ki-67 <20%) midgut NETs received LAN 120 mg/28 days for 1 year.
    Summary · context
    Primary endpoint was the clinical value of baseline CTCs to predict symptomatic response (decrease in diarrhoea or flushing of ≥50% frequency, or ≥1 severity level).
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In functional midgut NET patients receiving lanreotide, one-year PFS was 66.4% (95% CI 48.8; 79.2).

    In plain wordsIn functional midgut NET patients receiving lanreotide, one-year survival without progression was 66.4%.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    Not applicableOne-year progression-free survival
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Tumor growth · Cancer
    Studied dose
    120 mg/28 days · 1 yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    One-year PFS rate
    66.4%
    patients receiving lanreotide
    95% CI of one-year PFS rate
    48.8 to 79.2%
    patients receiving lanreotide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    One-year PFS rate was 66.4% (95% CI: 48.8; 79.2).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    CALM-NET was a phase IV exploratory study in the UK that aimed to evaluate if the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) at baseline predicted symptomatic response in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) treated with lanreotide autogel (LAN).
    Summary · context
    Adults with functional, well/moderately differentiated (Ki-67 <20%) midgut NETs received LAN 120 mg/28 days for 1 year.
    Summary · context
    Primary endpoint was the clinical value of baseline CTCs to predict symptomatic response (decrease in diarrhoea or flushing of ≥50% frequency, or ≥1 severity level).

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Lanreotide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Lanreotide.

  1. 03HumanNot a test of Lanreotide aloneObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In lanreotide-treated midgut NETs, patients without baseline CTC had 5.9-fold higher response odds, without significance; reported OR was 0.17 (95% CI 0.02; 1.65), p = .126.

    In plain wordsIn lanreotide-treated midgut NETs, response odds were higher without baseline circulating tumor cells than with them, without a significant difference.

    Peptide
    Lanreotide
    Outcome
    No significant changeSymptomatic response by baseline CTC status
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    patients with baseline circulating tumor cells
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Cancer

    Measurements

    Fold higher odds of symptomatic response, without versus with baseline CTC
    5.9 fold
    lanreotide-treated patients
    Odds ratio
    0.17 ratio
    with versus without baseline CTC
    95% CI of odds ratio
    0.02 to 1.65 ratio
    with versus without baseline CTC
    P value
    0.126 p
    odds ratio

    Source sentences

    Summary
    a 5.9-fold higher odds of symptomatic response in patients without CTC versus patients with CTC at baseline was observed, although this was not statistically significant (odds ratio: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.02; 1.65], p = .126).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    CALM-NET was a phase IV exploratory study in the UK that aimed to evaluate if the presence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) at baseline predicted symptomatic response in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) treated with lanreotide autogel (LAN).
    Summary · context
    Adults with functional, well/moderately differentiated (Ki-67 <20%) midgut NETs received LAN 120 mg/28 days for 1 year.
    Summary · context
    Primary endpoint was the clinical value of baseline CTCs to predict symptomatic response (decrease in diarrhoea or flushing of ≥50% frequency, or ≥1 severity level).

    In this study, Lanreotide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Lanreotide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 4Results postedNCT02075606

Circulating Tumour Cells in Somatuline Autogel Treated NeuroEndocrine Tumours Patients

Ipsenn = 50May 2014 to Jun 2017

NeuroEndocrine Tumours

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.