In HRT-FET cycles, triptorelin supplementation did not significantly change total pregnancy loss versus standard protocol alone (21% versus 33%).
In plain wordsIn HRT-FET cycles, total pregnancy loss did not differ significantly with triptorelin supplementation versus standard protocol alone.
- Outcome
- No significant changeTotal pregnancy loss
- Study
n = 287
- Comparator
- Standard HRT-FET protocol alone
- Outcome group
- Sex hormones and fertility · Reproductive and sexual health
- Studied dose
- Two boluses of 0.1 mgAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Total pregnancy loss
- 21%
- triptorelin group
- Total pregnancy loss
- 33%
- control group
- RR
- 0.63 unitless
- versus control
Source sentences
The intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in total pregnancy loss between the GnRHa group and the control group (21% versus 33%; relative risk [RR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-1.11)
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
Randomized controlled trial including a total of 287 HRT-FET cycles performed between 2013 and 2019.
After randomization participants allocated to the GnRHa group (n = 144) underwent a standard HRT protocol, supplemented with a total of two boluses of triptorelin 0.1 mg; one bolus 2 days before starting vaginal progesterone and one bolus on the 7th day of progesterone.
The control group (n = 143) underwent a standard HRT-FET protocol only.