Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2021

1 result

Values, preferences and burden of treatment for the initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

González-González JG, Díaz González-Colmenero A, Millán-Alanís JM, Lytvyn L, Solis RC, Mustafa RA, Palmer SC, Li S, Hao Q, Alvarez-Villalobos NA, Vandvik PO, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez R

BMJ open9 Jul 2021Cited by 8 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewOther

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, a systematic review of preference studies found some preference for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors over once daily liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, some studies found some patients preferred DPP-4 inhibitors to once daily liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Not applicablePatient preference versus DPP-4 inhibitors
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    DPP-4 inhibitors
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among studies comparing GLP-1 RA to other glucose-lowering medications, some preferences were observed for dypeptil peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with once daily liraglutide.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    17 studies (7296 patients) proved eligible.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.