In the pilot study, time in range was 70% with FiASP-pramlintide and 60% with FiASP-placebo, both with simple meal announcement.
In plain wordsIn the pilot study, time in range was 70% with insulin-pramlintide versus 60% with insulin-placebo, both using simple meal announcement.
- Peptide
- Pramlintide (Symlin)
- Outcome
- IncreasePilot time in range versus simple meal announcement
- Study
n = 4
- Comparator
- FiASP-placebo with simple meal announcement
- Outcome group
- Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
- Studied dose
- 1 U:10 μg FiASP:pramlintideAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Time in 3.9-10 mmol/L
- 70%
- FiASP-and-pramlintide with SMA
- Time in 3.9-10 mmol/L
- 60%
- FiASP-and-placebo with SMA
Source sentences
Time spent in 3.9-10 mmol/L was similar between the FiASP-and-placebo with FCC and FiASP-and-pramlintide with SMA interventions (70%), but was lower in the FiASP-and-placebo with SMA intervention (60%).
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
Four participants were included in the pilot analysis.
We conducted a subsequent 12-day outpatient pilot study comparing a FiASP-and-placebo system with FCC, a FiASP-and-pramlintide system with SMA, and a FiASP-and-placebo system with SMA.
Basal-bolus FiASP-and-pramlintide were delivered at a fixed ratio (1 U:10 μg).