Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2021

7 results

Exenatide Twice Daily Plus Glargine Versus Aspart 70/30 Twice Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Premixed Human Insulin and Metformin.

Chen X, Xu Y, Zhang J, Shao S, Duan Y, Liu P, Shen L, Zhang J, Zeng J, Lin M, Zhao S, Ma J and 13 more

Show all authors

Zhao T, Hu J, Liao Y, Chen X, Hu S, Xue Y, Zeng Z, He W, Liu Z, Li W, Liu L, Yin P, Yu X

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists6 Apr 2021Cited by 5 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone7

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glargine improved HbA1c more than aspart 70/30.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glargine lowered HbA1c more than aspart 70/30.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c
    Study

    n = 180

    Comparator
    Aspart 70/30 twice daily
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    HbA1c least squares mean change
    −0.59%
    exenatide plus glargine
    HbA1c least squares mean change
    −0.13%
    aspart 70/30
    HbA1c difference
    −0.45%
    exenatide plus glargine vs aspart 70/30; 95% CI -0.74 to -0.17

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 24 weeks, the patients receiving exenatide plus glargine (n = 90) had improved HbA1c control compared with those receiving aspart 70/30 (n = 90) (least squares mean change: ‒0.59 vs ‒0.13%; difference [95% CI]: ‒0.45 [‒0.74 to ‒0.17]) in the full analysis set population.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glargine reduced weight more than aspart 70/30.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide plus glargine reduced weight more than aspart 70/30.

    Outcome
    DecreaseWeight
    Study

    n = 180

    Comparator
    Aspart 70/30 twice daily
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −3.5 kg
    exenatide plus glargine
    Weight change
    −0.4 kg
    aspart 70/30

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Weight decreased 3.5 kg with exenatide and decreased 0.4 kg with aspart 70/30 (P < .001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, insulin dose decreased with exenatide plus glargine but increased with aspart 70/30.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, insulin dose fell with exenatide plus glargine but rose with aspart 70/30.

    Outcome
    DecreaseInsulin dose
    Study

    n = 180

    Comparator
    Aspart 70/30 twice daily
    Outcome group
    Patterns of use · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Insulin dose change
    −10.7 units/day
    exenatide plus glargine
    Insulin dose change
    9.7 units/day
    aspart 70/30

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The insulin dose was reduced 10.7 units/day (95% CI, ‒12.2 to ‒9.2 units; P < .001) with exenatide, and increased 9.7 units/day (95% CI, 8.2 to 11.2 units; P < .001) with aspart 70/30.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  4. 04HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, hypoglycemia incidence was similar with exenatide plus glargine and aspart 70/30.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, low blood sugar occurred at similar rates with exenatide plus glargine and aspart 70/30.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHypoglycemia
    Study

    n = 180

    Comparator
    Aspart 70/30 twice daily
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Hypoglycemia incidence
    27%
    exenatide plus glargine
    Hypoglycemia incidence
    38%
    aspart 70/30

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in 2 groups (27% for exenatide and 38% for aspart 70/30; P = .1).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  5. 05HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, nausea occurred in 21% of the exenatide plus glargine group.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, 21% of patients receiving exenatide plus glargine had nausea.

    Outcome
    Not applicableNausea
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Nausea incidence
    21%
    exenatide plus glargine group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  6. 06HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, vomiting occurred in 16% of the exenatide plus glargine group.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, 16% of patients receiving exenatide plus glargine had vomiting.

    Outcome
    Not applicableVomiting
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Vomiting incidence
    16%
    exenatide plus glargine group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  7. 07HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In type 2 diabetes, diarrhea occurred in 13% of the exenatide plus glargine group.

    In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, 13% of patients receiving exenatide plus glargine had diarrhea.

    Outcome
    Not applicableDiarrhea
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Measurements

    Diarrhea incidence
    13%
    exenatide plus glargine group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.