Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2021

5 results

Amylin Analog Pramlintide Induces Migraine-like Attacks in Patients.

Ghanizada H, Al-Karagholi MA, Walker CS, Arngrim N, Rees T, Petersen J, Siow A, Mørch-Rasmussen M, Tan S, O'Carroll SJ, Harris P, Skovgaard LT and 8 more

Show all authors

Jørgensen NR, Brimble M, Waite JS, Rea BJ, Sowers LP, Russo AF, Hay DL, Ashina M

Annals of neurology8 Apr 2021Cited by 92 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with migraine without aura, headache occurred in 88% after pramlintide versus 97% after CGRP, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn migraine patients, headache frequency did not differ significantly between pramlintide and CGRP.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHeadache
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Human αCGRP
    Outcome group
    Pain · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · infusionAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with headache
    88%
    after pramlintide infusion
    Patients with headache
    97%
    after CGRP infusion

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Thirty patients (88%) developed headache after pramlintide infusion, compared to 33 (97%) after CGRP (p = 0.375).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six migraine without aura patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, positive-controlled clinical trial study to receive infusion of an amylin analogue pramlintide or human αCGRP on 2 different experimental days.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with migraine without aura, migraine-like attacks occurred in 41% after pramlintide versus 56% after CGRP, without a significant difference.

    In plain wordsIn migraine patients, migraine-like attack frequency did not differ significantly between pramlintide and CGRP.

    Outcome
    No significant changeMigraine-like attacks
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Human αCGRP
    Outcome group
    Pain · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · infusionAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with migraine-like attacks
    41%
    after pramlintide infusion
    Patients with migraine-like attacks
    56%
    after CGRP infusion

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Fourteen patients (41%) developed migraine-like attacks after pramlintide infusion, compared to 19 patients (56%) after CGRP (p = 0.180).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six migraine without aura patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, positive-controlled clinical trial study to receive infusion of an amylin analogue pramlintide or human αCGRP on 2 different experimental days.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialOther

    In migraine patients, pramlintide-induced and CGRP-induced attacks had similar clinical characteristics.

    In plain wordsIn migraine patients, attacks after pramlintide and CGRP had similar characteristics.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAttack characteristics
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Human αCGRP
    Outcome group
    Pain · Nervous system and cognition
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · infusionAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The pramlintide-induced migraine-like attacks had similar clinical characteristics to those induced by CGRP.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six migraine without aura patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, positive-controlled clinical trial study to receive infusion of an amylin analogue pramlintide or human αCGRP on 2 different experimental days.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialOther

    In migraine patients, vascular parameters differed between pramlintide and CGRP treatment.

    In plain wordsIn migraine patients, vascular measurements differed between pramlintide and CGRP treatment.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedVascular parameters
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Human αCGRP
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · infusionAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were differences between treatments in vascular parameters.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six migraine without aura patients were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, positive-controlled clinical trial study to receive infusion of an amylin analogue pramlintide or human αCGRP on 2 different experimental days.
  5. 05LabIn vitro (cells)Mechanism

    In human receptor pharmacology studies, an amylin receptor likely mediated pramlintide effects rather than the canonical CGRP receptor.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, an amylin receptor likely mediated pramlintide effects rather than the canonical CGRP receptor.

    Outcome
    Not applicableReceptor mediation
    Study

    humann: not reported in source

    Human receptor pharmacology studies
    Comparator
    Canonical CGRP receptor
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Human receptor pharmacology studies showed that an amylin receptor likely mediates these pramlintide-provoked effects, rather than the canonical CGRP receptor.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials2

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 trials · 2 not yet recruiting · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

Not yet recruitingNot applicableNCT07340775

Hypersensitivity to Amylin in Post-Traumatic Headache

Danish Headache Centern = 21est. Feb 2026 to est. Dec 2028

Headache Disorders, Secondary · Brain Diseases · Headache Disorders · Nervous System Diseases · Central Nervous System Diseases · Neurologic Manifestations · Signs and Symptoms · Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms · Post-Traumatic Headache · Pain · Peptide Hormones · Hormones · Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists · Peptides · Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins · Amylin · Pramlintide

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 14 Jan 2026
Not yet recruitingNot applicableNCT07340788

Amylin-Induced Migraine Attacks Without Aura

Danish Headache Centern = 21est. Feb 2026 to est. 30 Oct 2028

Headache Disorders, Primary · Headache Disorders · Brain Diseases · Nervous System Diseases · Central Nervous System Diseases · Neurologic Manifestations · Signs and Symptoms · Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms · Migraine Disorders · Headache · Pain · Peptide Hormones · Hormones · Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists · Peptides · Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins · Amylin · Pramlintide

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 14 Jan 2026

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.