Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 78 · 2021

9 results

Effect of Kidney or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Somapacitan: Two Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trials.

Bentz Damholt B, Dombernowsky SL, Dahl Bendtsen M, Bisgaard C, Højby Rasmussen M

Clinical pharmacokinetics23 Mar 2021Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study9

9 results from studies that gave the peptide. 9 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In adults without GHD receiving somapacitan in kidney and hepatic impairment trials, no new safety or tolerability issues were observed.

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, somapacitan trials in kidney and liver impairment found no new safety or tolerability issues.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSafety and tolerability
    Study

    n = 78

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No new safety or tolerability issues were observed.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, severe kidney impairment was linked to higher somapacitan AUC versus normal function (ratio 1.75, 90% CI 1.00-3.06).

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, severe kidney impairment was linked to higher somapacitan exposure than normal kidney function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSomapacitan AUC, severe kidney impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal kidney function
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Somapacitan AUC0-168h ratio
    1.75 ratio
    Severe kidney impairment vs normal kidney function
    90% CI
    1 to 3.06 ratio
    Severe kidney impairment vs normal kidney function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the kidney impairment trial, somapacitan AUC0-168 h was higher in groups with severe kidney impairment and requiring hemodialysis versus the normal kidney function group (estimated ratio and 90% confidence interval 1.75 [1.00-3.06] and 1.63 [1.01-2.61], respectively).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, hemodialysis status was linked to higher somapacitan AUC versus normal function (ratio 1.63, 90% CI 1.01-2.61).

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, hemodialysis status was linked to higher somapacitan exposure than normal kidney function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSomapacitan AUC, hemodialysis
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal kidney function
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Somapacitan AUC0-168h ratio
    1.63 ratio
    Hemodialysis vs normal kidney function
    90% CI
    1.01 to 2.61 ratio
    Hemodialysis vs normal kidney function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the kidney impairment trial, somapacitan AUC0-168 h was higher in groups with severe kidney impairment and requiring hemodialysis versus the normal kidney function group (estimated ratio and 90% confidence interval 1.75 [1.00-3.06] and 1.63 [1.01-2.61], respectively).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, moderate hepatic impairment was linked to significantly higher somapacitan AUC (ratio 4.69, interval 2.92-7.52) versus normal function.

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, moderate liver impairment was linked to higher somapacitan exposure than normal liver function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSomapacitan AUC, moderate hepatic impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal hepatic function
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Pharmacokinetics · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Somapacitan AUC0-168h ratio
    4.69 ratio
    Moderate hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function
    Interval
    2.92 to 7.52 ratio
    Moderate hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the hepatic impairment trial, somapacitan AUC0-168 h was significantly higher in the moderate impairment group compared with the normal hepatic function group (4.69 [2.92-7.52]).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  5. 05HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, moderate kidney impairment was linked to higher IGF-I AUC after somapacitan (ratio 1.35, interval 1.09-1.66).

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, moderate kidney impairment was linked to higher IGF-I exposure after somapacitan than normal kidney function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIGF-I AUC, moderate kidney impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal kidney function
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-I AUC0-168h ratio
    1.35 ratio
    Moderate kidney impairment vs normal kidney function
    Interval
    1.09 to 1.66 ratio
    Moderate kidney impairment vs normal kidney function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    AUC0-168 h of IGF-I was increased in the moderate impairment group (1.35 [1.09-1.66]), severe impairment group (1.40 [1.10-1.78]), and requiring hemodialysis group (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), compared with the normal function group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  6. 06HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, severe kidney impairment was linked to higher IGF-I AUC after somapacitan (ratio 1.40, interval 1.10-1.78).

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, severe kidney impairment was linked to higher IGF-I exposure after somapacitan than normal kidney function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIGF-I AUC, severe kidney impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal kidney function
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-I AUC0-168h ratio
    1.4 ratio
    Severe kidney impairment vs normal kidney function
    Interval
    1.1 to 1.78 ratio
    Severe kidney impairment vs normal kidney function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    AUC0-168 h of IGF-I was increased in the moderate impairment group (1.35 [1.09-1.66]), severe impairment group (1.40 [1.10-1.78]), and requiring hemodialysis group (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), compared with the normal function group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  7. 07HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, hemodialysis status was linked to higher IGF-I AUC after somapacitan (ratio 1.24, interval 1.01-1.52).

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, hemodialysis status was linked to higher IGF-I exposure after somapacitan than normal kidney function.

    Outcome
    IncreaseIGF-I AUC, hemodialysis
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal kidney function
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-I AUC0-168h ratio
    1.24 ratio
    Hemodialysis vs normal kidney function
    Interval
    1.01 to 1.52 ratio
    Hemodialysis vs normal kidney function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    AUC0-168 h of IGF-I was increased in the moderate impairment group (1.35 [1.09-1.66]), severe impairment group (1.40 [1.10-1.78]), and requiring hemodialysis group (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), compared with the normal function group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  8. 08HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, mild hepatic impairment was linked to lower IGF-I AUC after somapacitan (ratio 0.85, interval 0.67-1.08) versus normal function.

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, mild liver impairment was linked to numerically lower IGF-I exposure after somapacitan than normal liver function.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIGF-I AUC, mild hepatic impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal hepatic function
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-I AUC0-168h ratio
    0.85 ratio
    Mild hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function
    Interval
    0.67 to 1.08 ratio
    Mild hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    IGF-I AUC0-168 h was lower in both hepatic impairment groups (0.85 [0.67-1.08] for the mild impairment group and 0.75 [0.60-0.95] for the moderate impairment group) compared with the normal function group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.
  9. 09HumanObservational studyPharmacokinetics

    In adults without GHD, moderate hepatic impairment was linked to lower IGF-I AUC after somapacitan (ratio 0.75, interval 0.60-0.95) versus normal function.

    In plain wordsIn adults without GHD, moderate liver impairment was linked to lower IGF-I exposure after somapacitan than normal liver function.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIGF-I AUC, moderate hepatic impairment
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Normal hepatic function
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    0.08 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-I AUC0-168h ratio
    0.75 ratio
    Moderate hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function
    Interval
    0.6 to 0.95 ratio
    Moderate hepatic impairment vs normal hepatic function

    Source sentences

    Summary
    IGF-I AUC0-168 h was lower in both hepatic impairment groups (0.85 [0.67-1.08] for the mild impairment group and 0.75 [0.60-0.95] for the moderate impairment group) compared with the normal function group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight.
    Summary · context
    Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials2

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 trials · 2 completed · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 1NCT03212131

Investigation of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of Somapacitan in Subjects With Mild and Moderate Degrees of Hepatic Impairment Compared to Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function.

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 3416 Aug 2017 to 8 Mar 2018

Growth Hormone Disorder · Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency · Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 24 May 2019
CompletedPhase 1NCT03186495

Investigation of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of Somapacitan in Subjects With Various Degrees of Impaired Renal Function Compared to Subjects With Normal Renal Function

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 4420 Jun 2017 to 17 May 2018

Growth Hormone Disorder · Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency · Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 17 Apr 2020

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.