Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 222 · 2021

7 results

Effect of COMBinAtion therapy with remote ischemic conditioning and exenatide on the Myocardial Infarct size: a two-by-two factorial randomized trial (COMBAT-MI).

García Del Blanco B, Otaegui I, Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Bayés-Genis A, Fernández-Nofrerías E, Vilalta Del Olmo V, Carrillo X, Ibáñez B, Worner F, Casanova J, Pueo E, González-Juanatey JR and 27 more

Show all authors

López-Pais J, Bardají A, Bonet G, Fuertes M, Rodríguez-Sinovas A, Ruiz-Meana M, Inserte J, Barba I, Gómez-Talavera S, Martí G, Serra B, Bellera N, Ojeda-Ramos M, Cuellar H, Valente F, Carmona MÁ, Miró-Casas E, Marsal JR, Sambola A, Lidón RM, Bañeras J, Elízaga J, Padilla F, Barrabés JA, Hausenloy DJ, Ferreira-González I, García-Dorado D

Basic research in cardiology25 Jan 2021Cited by 30 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. 6 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In STEMI patients receiving PPCI, infarct size did not differ between exenatide and placebo.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients receiving PPCI, exenatide and placebo produced similar infarct sizes.

    Outcome
    No significant changeInfarct size
    Study

    n = 222

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Infarct size
    25.1%
    exenatide group
    Infarct size
    22.5%
    placebo group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and the exenatide hypotheses (25.1 ± 11.5% in the exenatide group vs 22.5 ± 10.9% in the placebo group, P = 0.092).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In STEMI patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not affect myocardial salvage index versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not improve myocardial salvage compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeMyocardial salvage index
    Study

    n = 222

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume.
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In STEMI patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not affect transmurality index versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not change transmurality index compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTransmurality index
    Study

    n = 222

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume.
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In STEMI patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not affect left ventricular ejection fraction versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not improve heart pumping fraction compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLeft ventricular ejection fraction
    Study

    n = 222

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume.
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In STEMI patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not affect relative microvascular obstruction volume versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients receiving PPCI, exenatide did not reduce small vessel obstruction volume compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeRelative microvascular obstruction volume
    Study

    n = 222

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no effects with either RIC or exenatide on the secondary outcomes.
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The secondary outcomes were myocardial salvage index, transmurality index, left ventricular ejection fraction and relative microvascular obstruction volume.
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In STEMI patients, no unexpected adverse events or side effects of exenatide were observed.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients, researchers observed no unexpected adverse events or side effects of exenatide.

    Outcome
    Not applicableUnexpected adverse events or side effects
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Unexpected adverse events or side effects of RIC and exenatide were not observed.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 07HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialOther

    In STEMI patients, RIC and exenatide showed no significant interaction on primary or secondary outcomes.

    In plain wordsIn heart attack patients, the effects of RIC and exenatide showed no significant interaction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTreatment interaction
    Study

    n = 222

    Outcome group
    Heart function · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There were no significant interactions between the two randomization factors on the primary or secondary outcomes.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We designed a two-by-two factorial, randomized controlled, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Summary · context
    Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 6 h of symptoms were randomized to RIC or sham procedure and exenatide or matching placebo.
    Summary · context
    A total of 378 patients were randomly allocated, and after applying exclusion criteria, 222 patients were available for analysis.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.