Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 10 · 2021

2 results

The effect of preceding glucose decline rate on low-dose glucagon efficacy in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial.

Laugesen C, Schmidt S, Holst JJ, Nørgaard K, Ranjan AG

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism6 Jan 2021Cited by 1 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 1 diabetes, glucagon glucose AUC did not differ after rapid versus slow decline: 220 ± 49 versus 174 ± 31 mmoL/L x min (P = 0.21).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 1 diabetes, glucagon's glucose response did not significantly differ after rapid versus slow glucose decline.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    No significant changePositive incremental glucose AUC
    Study

    n = 10

    Comparator
    Slow preceding glucose decline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    150 μg · subcutaneous · 120 minutes observationAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Positive incremental glucose AUC
    220 mmoL/L x min
    rapid-decline visit, mean, SEM 49
    Positive incremental glucose AUC
    174 mmoL/L x min
    slow-decline visit, mean, SEM 31
    P value
    0.21
    rapid vs slow decline

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The positive incremental area under the glucose curve after administration of low-dose glucagon did not differ between the rapid-decline and slow-decline visits (mean ± SEM: 220 ± 49 vs. 174 ± 31 mmoL/L x min; P = 0.21).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Ten adults with insulin pump-treated type 1 diabetes were included in this randomized, single-blind, two-way crossover study.
    Summary · context
    Using a hyperinsulinaemic clamp technique, plasma glucose levels were reduced with either a rapid or slow decline rate while maintaining fixed insulin levels.
    Summary · context
    When the plasma glucose level reached 3.9 mmoL/L, insulin and glucose infusions were discontinued and 150 μg subcutaneous glucagon was administered, followed by 120 minutes of plasma glucose monitoring.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 1 diabetes, total glucose AUC, peak glucose, incremental peak glucose, time-to-peak glucose, and end glucose after glucagon did not differ between rapid- and slow-decline visits.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 1 diabetes, five other glucose measures after glucagon did not differ after rapid versus slow glucose decline.

    Peptide
    Glucagon
    Outcome
    No significant changeOther glucose response measures
    Study

    n = 10

    Comparator
    Slow preceding glucose decline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    150 μg · subcutaneous · 120 minutes observationAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similarly, no differences in total area under the glucose curve, peak plasma glucose, incremental peak plasma glucose, time-to-peak plasma glucose or end plasma glucose were observed.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Ten adults with insulin pump-treated type 1 diabetes were included in this randomized, single-blind, two-way crossover study.
    Summary · context
    Using a hyperinsulinaemic clamp technique, plasma glucose levels were reduced with either a rapid or slow decline rate while maintaining fixed insulin levels.
    Summary · context
    When the plasma glucose level reached 3.9 mmoL/L, insulin and glucose infusions were discontinued and 150 μg subcutaneous glucagon was administered, followed by 120 minutes of plasma glucose monitoring.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.