Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2020

17 results

Evaluation of the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide and Sitagliptin in the Spanish Setting.

Martín V, Vidal J, Malkin SJP, Hallén N, Hunt B

Advances in therapy29 Aug 2020Cited by 12 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study17

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone17

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected discounted life expectancy versus dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected lifespan compared with dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected life expectancy, lower dose versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Life expectancy gain
    0.02 years
    semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  2. 02Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected discounted life expectancy versus dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected lifespan compared with dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected life expectancy, higher dose versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Life expectancy gain
    0.11 years
    semaglutide 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  3. 03Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected life adjusted for health quality compared with dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy, lower dose versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.03 QALYs
    semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 04Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected life adjusted for health quality compared with dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy, higher dose versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.11 QALYs
    semaglutide 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  5. 05Computer modelNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, dulaglutide had lower projected discounted life expectancy than semaglutide 0.5 mg.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, dulaglutide had lower projected lifespan than semaglutide 0.5 mg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected life expectancy versus lower-dose semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Semaglutide 0.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  6. 06Computer modelNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, dulaglutide had lower projected discounted life expectancy than semaglutide 1 mg.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, dulaglutide had lower projected lifespan than semaglutide 1 mg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected life expectancy versus higher-dose semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Semaglutide 1 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  7. 07Computer modelNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, dulaglutide had lower projected quality-adjusted life expectancy than semaglutide 0.5 mg.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, dulaglutide had lower projected life adjusted for health quality than semaglutide 0.5 mg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus lower-dose semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Semaglutide 0.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  8. 08Computer modelNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, dulaglutide had lower projected quality-adjusted life expectancy than semaglutide 1 mg.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, dulaglutide had lower projected life adjusted for health quality than semaglutide 1 mg.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus higher-dose semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Semaglutide 1 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Projections of long-term clinical outcomes indicated that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.02 and 0.11 years, respectively, and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.03 and 0.11 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  9. 09Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected discounted life expectancy versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected lifespan compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected life expectancy, lower dose versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Life expectancy gain
    0.17 years
    semaglutide 0.5 mg versus sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared with sitagliptin, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.17 and 0.24 years, respectively and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.16 and 0.23 QALYs.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  10. 10Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected discounted life expectancy versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected lifespan compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected life expectancy, higher dose versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Life expectancy gain
    0.24 years
    semaglutide 1 mg versus sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared with sitagliptin, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.17 and 0.24 years, respectively and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.16 and 0.23 QALYs.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  11. 11Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 0.5 mg increased projected life adjusted for health quality compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy, lower dose versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.16 QALYs
    semaglutide 0.5 mg versus sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared with sitagliptin, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.17 and 0.24 years, respectively and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.16 and 0.23 QALYs.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  12. 12Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected quality-adjusted life expectancy versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide 1 mg increased projected life adjusted for health quality compared with sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected quality-adjusted life expectancy, higher dose versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Measurements

    Quality-adjusted life expectancy gain
    0.23 QALYs
    semaglutide 1 mg versus sitagliptin

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared with sitagliptin, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg were associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.17 and 0.24 years, respectively and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.16 and 0.23 QALYs.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  13. 13Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide was associated with reduced cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide was associated with fewer projected diabetes complications.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected complication incidence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The increased duration and quality of life with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg resulted from a reduced cumulative incidence and delayed time to onset of diabetes-related complications.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  14. 14Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a diabetes model, semaglutide was associated with delayed onset of diabetes-related complications.

    In plain wordsIn a computer model of diabetes, semaglutide was associated with later projected diabetes complications.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected complication onset
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The increased duration and quality of life with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg resulted from a reduced cumulative incidence and delayed time to onset of diabetes-related complications.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  15. 15Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a Spanish diabetes model, both semaglutide doses were cost-saving versus dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn a Spanish computer model of diabetes, both semaglutide doses cost less than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected costs versus dulaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Avoided complications resulted in once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg being cost-saving versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg and versus sitagliptin 100 mg from a healthcare payer perspective.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  16. 16Computer modelNot a test of Semaglutide aloneIn silicoOther

    In a Spanish diabetes model, both semaglutide doses were cost-saving versus sitagliptin.

    In plain wordsIn a Spanish computer model of diabetes, both semaglutide doses cost less than sitagliptin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseProjected costs versus sitagliptin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Sitagliptin 100 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Avoided complications resulted in once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg being cost-saving versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg and versus sitagliptin 100 mg from a healthcare payer perspective.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  17. 17Computer modelNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneIn silicoOther

    In a Spanish diabetes model, dulaglutide had higher projected costs than both semaglutide doses.

    In plain wordsIn a Spanish computer model of diabetes, dulaglutide cost more than both semaglutide doses.

    Outcome
    IncreaseProjected costs versus semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model
    Comparator
    Semaglutide 0.5 or 1 mg
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Avoided complications resulted in once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg being cost-saving versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg and versus sitagliptin 100 mg from a healthcare payer perspective.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Cost and clinical outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model.
    Summary · context
    Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects on initiation of semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, dulaglutide 1.5 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg were based on the once-weekly semaglutide clinical trial program (SUSTAIN 7 and 2).

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.