In Japanese adults with diabetes, all evaluable patients achieved success with either glucagon route, meeting non-inferiority criteria (difference 0%, upper confidence limit 1.47%).
In plain wordsIn Japanese adults with diabetes, nasal glucagon met non-inferiority criteria versus intramuscular glucagon for successful treatment.
- Peptide
- Glucagon
- Outcome
- No significant changeTreatment success
- Study
n = 68
- Comparator
- Intramuscular glucagon 1 mg
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
- Studied dose
- 3 mg · nasalAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Treatment arm difference in treatment success (IMG minus NG)
- 0%
- nasal versus intramuscular glucagon
- Upper limit of two-sided 95% CI of the difference
- 1.47%
- nasal versus intramuscular glucagon
Source sentences
All NG- and IMG-treated patients achieved treatment success (treatment arm difference: 0%; upper limit of two-sided 95% CI 1.47%); NG met prespecified conditions defining non-inferiority versus IMG.
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
Sixty-eight patients completed the study and were evaluable.
This phase 3, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period crossover non-inferiority study enrolled Japanese adults with T1DM or T2DM on insulin therapy, with glycated haemoglobin levels ≤86 mmol/mol (≤10%).
Patients received NG 3 mg or IMG 1 mg approximately 5 minutes after insulin termination.