Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 9,340 · 2019

4 results

Effects of Liraglutide Compared With Placebo on Events of Acute Gallbladder or Biliary Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk for Cardiovascular Events in the LEADER Randomized Trial.

Nauck MA, Muus Ghorbani ML, Kreiner E, Saevereid HA, Buse JB

Diabetes care9 Aug 2019Cited by 51 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, liraglutide increased the risk of acute gallbladder or biliary disease versus placebo (HR 1.60).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at high heart risk, liraglutide raised the risk of gallbladder or bile duct disease compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAcute gallbladder or biliary disease
    Study

    n = 9,340

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    up to 1.8 mg daily · 3.5-5 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    1.6 HR
    liraglutide vs placebo
    Patients with events
    141 patients
    liraglutide
    Patients with events
    88 patients
    placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was an increased risk of acute gallbladder or biliary disease with liraglutide versus placebo (n = 141 of 4,668 vs. n = 88 of 4,672 patients, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 1.60; 95% CI 1.23, 2.09; P < 0.001).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events (n = 9,340) were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 4,668) or placebo (n = 4,672), with both groups also receiving standard care (treatment period: 3.5-5 years).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, similar trends of higher risk with liraglutide versus placebo were seen for uncomplicated stones, complicated stones, cholecystitis and biliary obstruction.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at high heart risk, all four gallbladder or bile duct event types were more likely with liraglutide than placebo.

    Outcome
    IncreaseFour categories of gallbladder or biliary events
    Study

    n = 9,340

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    up to 1.8 mg daily · 3.5-5 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Similar trends were observed for each of the four categories of gallbladder- or biliary tract-related events.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This post hoc analysis categorized captured events of acute gallbladder or biliary disease into four groups: uncomplicated gallbladder stones, complicated gallbladder stones, cholecystitis, and biliary obstruction.
    Summary · context
    Participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events (n = 9,340) were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 4,668) or placebo (n = 4,672), with both groups also receiving standard care (treatment period: 3.5-5 years).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, cholecystectomy was performed more often with liraglutide than with placebo (HR 1.56).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at high heart risk, gallbladder removal surgery happened more often with liraglutide than with placebo.

    Outcome
    IncreaseCholecystectomy
    Study

    n = 9,340

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    up to 1.8 mg daily · 3.5-5 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    1.56 HR
    liraglutide vs placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Cholecystectomy was performed more frequently in liraglutide-treated patients (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.10, 2.20; P = 0.013)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events (n = 9,340) were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 4,668) or placebo (n = 4,672), with both groups also receiving standard care (treatment period: 3.5-5 years).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Among people with gallbladder or biliary events, similar proportions had cholecystectomy with liraglutide (57%) and placebo (59%).

    In plain wordsAmong people who had gallbladder or bile duct events, about the same share had surgery with liraglutide as with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCholecystectomy among patients with gallbladder or biliary events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    up to 1.8 mg daily · 3.5-5 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion with cholecystectomy
    57%
    liraglutide
    Proportion with cholecystectomy
    59%
    placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    but for similar proportions of the patients who experienced gallbladder- or biliary tract-related events (57% with liraglutide vs. 59% with placebo).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for CV events (n = 9,340) were randomized 1:1 to receive either liraglutide (≤1.8 mg daily; n = 4,668) or placebo (n = 4,672), with both groups also receiving standard care (treatment period: 3.5-5 years).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT01179048

Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 9,34131 Aug 2010 to 17 Dec 2015

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 17 Jul 2019

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.