In SCLC patients, median PFS was 3.6 months with lanreotide versus 2.3 with observation, without a significant difference.
In plain wordsIn SCLC patients, lanreotide did not significantly prolong survival without progression versus observation.
- Peptide
- Lanreotide
- Outcome
- No significant changePFS overall
- Study
n = 71
- Comparator
- Observation
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Tumor growth · Cancer
- Studied dose
- 120 mg every 28 days · subcutaneous · Up to 1 year or progressionAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Median PFS
- 3.6 months
- lanreotide, 95% CI 3.2-3.9
- Median PFS
- 2.3 months
- observation, 95% CI 1.7-2.9
- Hazard ratio for PFS
- 1.51
- 95% CI 0.90-2.50
- P value for PFS
- 0.11
- lanreotide versus observation
Source sentences
Median PFS was 3.6 (95% CI 3.2-3.9) with lanreotide versus 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-2.9) with observation (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.90-2.50; P = 0.11).
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial was conducted in SCLC expressing somatostatine receptors at baseline Octreoscan, responding after platinum-based chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive maintenance lanreotide 120 mg subcutaneously every 28 days, up to 1 year or progression versus observation.