Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 60 · 2018

12 results

Liraglutide suppresses non-esterified free fatty acids and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 compared with metformin in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes.

Chen XM, Zhang WQ, Tian Y, Wang LF, Chen CC, Qiu CM

Cardiovascular diabetology10 Apr 2018Cited by 17 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundIt has been suggested that liraglutide could have an impact on glucose and lipid metabolism disorder and adhesion molecule activation, which may play important roles in the vascular damage of diabetes. In this study, we examined the effects of liraglutide versus metformin on non-esterified free fatty acids, beta-cell insulin secretion, and adhesion molecule levels in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin. Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed. Plasma glucose, lipids and lipoprotein, plasma insulin, glycaemic and insulin responses, non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA), and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) levels were evaluated.ResultsAfter 8 weeks, 120 min of NEFA (155 ± 125 vs 99 ± 73 µmol/L, P = 0.026) and the levels of sVCAM-1 (465 ± 136 vs 382 ± 131 ng/ml, P = 0.013) significantly decreased, while the early phase insulin secretion index (24.94 [7.78, 38.89] vs. 31.13 [17.67, 59.09], P = 0.031), fasting plasma insulin (104 [51, 123] vs 113 [54, 171] mIU/L, P = 0.015), 60 min plasma insulin (326 [165, 441] vs 471 [334, 717] mIU/L, P = 0.005), 120 min plasma insulin (401 [193, 560] vs 500 [367, 960] mIU/L, P = 0.047), and insulin area under the curve (AUCins) (648 [321, 742] vs 738 [451, 1118] mIU/L, P = 0.005) remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group. The levels of sVCAM-1 dramatically decreased after 8 weeks of liraglutide treatment (503 ± 182 vs 382 ± 131 ng/ml, P = 0.046) compared to that of the metformin treatment group. At the same time, the differences before and after liraglutide treatment in 120 min of NEFA (- 32 [- 96, - 5] vs 5 [- 35, 38] µmol/L, P = 0.033) and AUCins (738 [451, 1118] vs 594 [357, 1216] mIU/L, P = 0.014) were remarkably enhanced compared to that of the metformin therapy. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in fasting NEFA after liraglutide or metformin treatment. The reduction of 120 min NEFA (ΔNEFA) was positively correlated with the decrease of sVCAM-1 (ΔsVCAM-1) after 8 weeks of liraglutide treatment (r = 0.523, P = 0.003).ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that liraglutide administration is more effective than metformin in reducing 120 min NEFA and suppressing sVCAM-1 levels for recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. We suggest that this outcome may be because liraglutide is associated with potentiating insulin secretion capacity, inhibiting vascular inflammatory cytokines, and antagonizing atherosclerosis.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study12

12 results from studies that gave the peptide. 12 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, sVCAM-1 was significantly lower after 8 weeks of liraglutide than with metformin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, liraglutide lowered a blood marker of vessel inflammation more than metformin.

    Outcome
    DecreasesVCAM-1 after treatment, liraglutide versus metformin
    Study

    n = 60

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The levels of sVCAM-1 dramatically decreased after 8 weeks of liraglutide treatment (503 ± 182 vs 382 ± 131 ng/ml, P = 0.046) compared to that of the metformin treatment group.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, the fall in 120-min NEFA with liraglutide was significantly greater than with metformin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, liraglutide lowered blood free fatty acids after a glucose drink more than metformin.

    Outcome
    DecreaseChange in 120-min NEFA, liraglutide versus metformin
    Study

    n = 60

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    the differences before and after liraglutide treatment in 120 min of NEFA (- 32 [- 96, - 5] vs 5 [- 35, 38] µmol/L, P = 0.033)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    were remarkably enhanced compared to that of the metformin therapy.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, the change in insulin area under the curve with liraglutide was significantly greater than with metformin.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, liraglutide raised total insulin release after a glucose drink more than metformin.

    Outcome
    IncreaseChange in insulin area under the curve, liraglutide versus metformin
    Study

    n = 60

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    AUCins (738 [451, 1118] vs 594 [357, 1216] mIU/L, P = 0.014)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    were remarkably enhanced compared to that of the metformin therapy.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, fasting NEFA showed no significant differences after liraglutide or metformin treatment.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, fasting blood free fatty acids showed no significant difference after liraglutide or metformin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFasting NEFA
    Study

    n = 60

    Comparator
    Metformin
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in fasting NEFA after liraglutide or metformin treatment.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, 120-min NEFA decreased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, blood free fatty acids after a glucose drink fell after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Decrease120-min non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    120-min NEFA
    155 µmol/L
    before
    120-min NEFA
    99 µmol/L
    after 8 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 8 weeks, 120 min of NEFA (155 ± 125 vs 99 ± 73 µmol/L, P = 0.026) and the levels of sVCAM-1 (465 ± 136 vs 382 ± 131 ng/ml, P = 0.013) significantly decreased
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, sVCAM-1 decreased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, a blood marker of vessel inflammation fell after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseSoluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    sVCAM-1
    465 ng/ml
    before
    sVCAM-1
    382 ng/ml
    after 8 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After 8 weeks, 120 min of NEFA (155 ± 125 vs 99 ± 73 µmol/L, P = 0.026) and the levels of sVCAM-1 (465 ± 136 vs 382 ± 131 ng/ml, P = 0.013) significantly decreased
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, the early phase insulin secretion index increased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, early insulin release rose after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseEarly phase insulin secretion index
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    early phase insulin secretion index (24.94 [7.78, 38.89] vs. 31.13 [17.67, 59.09], P = 0.031)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, fasting plasma insulin increased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, fasting insulin rose after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseFasting plasma insulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    fasting plasma insulin (104 [51, 123] vs 113 [54, 171] mIU/L, P = 0.015)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, 60-min plasma insulin increased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, insulin 60 minutes after a glucose drink rose after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Increase60-min plasma insulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    60 min plasma insulin (326 [165, 441] vs 471 [334, 717] mIU/L, P = 0.005)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, 120-min plasma insulin increased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, insulin 120 minutes after a glucose drink rose after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Increase120-min plasma insulin
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    120 min plasma insulin (401 [193, 560] vs 500 [367, 960] mIU/L, P = 0.047)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, insulin area under the curve increased significantly after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, total insulin release after a glucose drink rose after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseInsulin area under the curve (AUCins)
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    insulin area under the curve (AUCins) (648 [321, 742] vs 738 [451, 1118] mIU/L, P = 0.005)
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    remarkably increased for patients in the liraglutide treatment group.
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialMechanism

    In adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, the reduction in 120-min NEFA correlated positively with the decrease in sVCAM-1 after 8 weeks of liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with recent-onset type 2 diabetes on liraglutide, bigger falls in free fatty acids went with bigger falls in a vessel inflammation marker.

    Outcome
    Not applicableCorrelation between change in 120-min NEFA and change in sVCAM-1
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · subcutaneous · 8 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Correlation coefficient r
    0.523 r
    ΔNEFA vs ΔsVCAM-1

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The reduction of 120 min NEFA (ΔNEFA) was positively correlated with the decrease of sVCAM-1 (ΔsVCAM-1) after 8 weeks of liraglutide treatment (r = 0.523, P = 0.003).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In this study, 60 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 33.97 ± 5.67 years) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide or oral metformin.
    Summary · context
    Before the study and after the 8-week treatment period, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.