In advanced lung or thymic carcinoids, month 9 disease control was 39.0% with pasireotide versus 33.3% with everolimus.
In plain wordsIn advanced lung or thymic carcinoids, month 9 disease control was 39.0% with pasireotide versus 33.3% with everolimus.
- Peptide
- Pasireotide
- Outcome
- IncreaseMonth 9 disease control versus everolimus
- Study
n = 83
- Comparator
- Everolimus alone
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Tumor growth · Cancer
- Studied dose
- 60 mg every 28 days · intramuscularAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Patients with CR, PR or stable disease at month 9
- 39%
- pasireotide group, 16 of 41 patients
- 95% CI of proportion with CR, PR or stable disease
- 24.2 to 55.5%
- pasireotide group, month 9
- Patients with CR, PR or stable disease at month 9
- 33.3%
- everolimus group, 14 of 42 patients
- 95% CI of proportion with CR, PR or stable disease
- 19.6 to 49.5%
- everolimus group, month 9
Source sentences
At month 9, the proportion of patients with an overall lesion assessment of complete response, partial response, or stable disease was 16 of 41 patients (39·0%, 95% CI 24·2-55·5) in the long-acting pasireotide group, 14 of 42 patients (33·3%, 19·6-49·5) in the everolimus group, and 24 of 41 patients…
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The randomisation allocation sequence was generated by an external company; patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive treatment with long-acting pasireotide (60 mg intramuscularly every 28 days), everolimus (10 mg orally once daily), or both in combination, for the core 12-month treatment period.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients progression-free at month 9, defined as the proportion of patients with overall lesion assessment at month 9 showing a complete response, partial response, or stable disease according to local Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1…