Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 4 · 2017

4 results

Growth hormone receptor antagonism with pegvisomant in insulin resistant non-diabetic men: A phase II pilot study.

Lee AP, Mulligan K, Schambelan M, Murphy EJ, Weiss EJ

F1000Research3 May 2017Cited by 5 (Europe PMC)

Summary

Background: Growth hormone (GH) is known to affect insulin and glucose metabolism.  Blocking its effects in acromegalic patients improves diabetes and glucose metabolism. We aimed to determine the effect of pegvisomant, a GH receptor antagonist, on insulin resistance, endogenous glucose production (EGP) and lipolysis in insulin resistant non-diabetic men.  Methods: Four men between the ages of 18-62 with a BMI of 18-35kg/m 2, with insulin resistance as defined by a HOMA-IR > 2.77, were treated for four weeks with pegvisomant 20 mg daily.  Inpatient metabolic assessments were performed before and after treatment. The main outcome measurements were: change after pegvisomant therapy in insulin sensitivity as measured by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp; and EGP and lipolysis assessed by stable isotope tracer techniques. Results: Insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations decreased from 134.0 ± 41.5 (mean ± SD) to 72.0 ± 11.7 ng/mL (p = 0.04) after 4 weeks of therapy. Whole body insulin sensitivity index (M/I 3.2 ± 1.3 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4; P = 0.82), as well as suppression of EGP (89.7 ± 26.9 vs. 83.5 ± 21.6%; p = 0.10) and Ra glycerol (59.4 ± 22.1% vs. 61.2 ± 14.4%; p = 0.67) during the clamp were not changed significantly with pegvisomant treatment. Conclusions: Blockade of the GH receptor with pegvisomant for four weeks had no significant effect on insulin/glucose metabolism in a small phase II pilot study of non-diabetic insulin resistant participants without acromegaly.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change insulin sensitivity (3.2 ± 1.3 versus 3.4 ± 2.4, P = 0.82).

    In plain wordsIn insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change insulin sensitivity compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    No significant changeWhole body insulin sensitivity index
    Study

    n = 4

    Comparator
    Before treatment
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    20 mg daily · four weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Whole body insulin sensitivity index (M/I) before treatment
    3.2 M/I
    baseline, mean ± SD 3.2 ± 1.3
    Whole body insulin sensitivity index (M/I) after treatment
    3.4 M/I
    after 4 weeks pegvisomant, mean ± SD 3.4 ± 2.4

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Whole body insulin sensitivity index (M/I 3.2 ± 1.3 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4; P = 0.82), as well as suppression of EGP (89.7 ± 26.9 vs. 83.5 ± 21.6%; p = 0.10) and Ra glycerol (59.4 ± 22.1% vs. 61.2 ± 14.4%; p = 0.67) during the clamp were not changed significantly with pegvisomant treatment.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Four men between the ages of 18-62 with a BMI of 18-35kg/m 2, with insulin resistance as defined by a HOMA-IR > 2.77, were treated for four weeks with pegvisomant 20 mg daily.
    Summary · context
    Inpatient metabolic assessments were performed before and after treatment.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change clamp EGP suppression (89.7 ± 26.9 versus 83.5 ± 21.6%, p = 0.10).

    In plain wordsIn insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change glucose production suppression compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSuppression of endogenous glucose production
    Study

    n = 4

    Comparator
    Before treatment
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    20 mg daily · four weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    EGP suppression during clamp, before treatment
    89.7%
    baseline, mean ± SD 89.7 ± 26.9
    EGP suppression during clamp, after treatment
    83.5%
    after 4 weeks pegvisomant, mean ± SD 83.5 ± 21.6

    Source sentences

    Summary
    as well as suppression of EGP (89.7 ± 26.9 vs. 83.5 ± 21.6%; p = 0.10) and Ra glycerol (59.4 ± 22.1% vs. 61.2 ± 14.4%; p = 0.67) during the clamp were not changed significantly with pegvisomant treatment.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Four men between the ages of 18-62 with a BMI of 18-35kg/m 2, with insulin resistance as defined by a HOMA-IR > 2.77, were treated for four weeks with pegvisomant 20 mg daily.
    Summary · context
    Inpatient metabolic assessments were performed before and after treatment.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change clamp glycerol suppression (59.4 ± 22.1% versus 61.2 ± 14.4%, p = 0.67).

    In plain wordsIn insulin-resistant men, pegvisomant did not significantly change glycerol suppression compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSuppression of glycerol appearance
    Study

    n = 4

    Comparator
    Before treatment
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Lipids · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    20 mg daily · four weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Ra glycerol suppression during clamp, before treatment
    59.4%
    baseline, mean ± SD 59.4 ± 22.1
    Ra glycerol suppression during clamp, after treatment
    61.2%
    after 4 weeks pegvisomant, mean ± SD 61.2 ± 14.4

    Source sentences

    Summary
    as well as suppression of EGP (89.7 ± 26.9 vs. 83.5 ± 21.6%; p = 0.10) and Ra glycerol (59.4 ± 22.1% vs. 61.2 ± 14.4%; p = 0.67) during the clamp were not changed significantly with pegvisomant treatment.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Four men between the ages of 18-62 with a BMI of 18-35kg/m 2, with insulin resistance as defined by a HOMA-IR > 2.77, were treated for four weeks with pegvisomant 20 mg daily.
    Summary · context
    Inpatient metabolic assessments were performed before and after treatment.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In insulin-resistant non-diabetic men, pegvisomant reduced IGF-1 from 134.0 ± 41.5 to 72.0 ± 11.7 ng/mL (p = 0.04).

    In plain wordsIn insulin-resistant men without diabetes, pegvisomant reduced IGF-1 compared with baseline.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIGF-1 concentration
    Study

    n = 4

    Comparator
    Before treatment
    Outcome group
    Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    20 mg daily · four weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    IGF-1 before treatment
    134 ng/mL
    baseline, mean ± SD 134.0 ± 41.5
    IGF-1 after 4 weeks
    72 ng/mL
    after pegvisomant 20 mg daily, mean ± SD 72.0 ± 11.7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations decreased from 134.0 ± 41.5 (mean ± SD) to 72.0 ± 11.7 ng/mL (p = 0.04) after 4 weeks of therapy.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Four men between the ages of 18-62 with a BMI of 18-35kg/m 2, with insulin resistance as defined by a HOMA-IR > 2.77, were treated for four weeks with pegvisomant 20 mg daily.
    Summary · context
    Inpatient metabolic assessments were performed before and after treatment.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.