Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 36 · 2017

14 results

Comparison of exenatide and acarbose on intra-abdominal fat content in patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

Shi L, Zhu J, Yang P, Tang X, Yu W, Pan C, Shen M, Zhu D, Cheng J, Ye X

Obesity research & clinical practice1 Feb 2017Cited by 24 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study14

12 results from studies that gave the peptide. 12 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, intra-abdominal fat was lower with metformin/exenatide than metformin/acarbose at 3 months.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, abdominal fat was lower with metformin/exenatide than metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIntra-abdominal fat versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Intra-abdominal fat content decreased in the GLP-1 group from baseline to 3 months (17,947±5804; 13,717±3628mm2, P=0.001, respectively), but was not significantly reduced in the control group (P=0.197) and at 3 months post-treatment, it was significantly lower in the GLP-1 group than control group (P=0.043).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes receiving metformin, intra-abdominal fat decreased after exenatide treatment.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes taking metformin, abdominal fat decreased after exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIntra-abdominal fat change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Intra-abdominal fat content
    17,947 mm<sup>2</sup>
    GLP-1 group, baseline
    Intra-abdominal fat content
    13,717 mm<sup>2</sup>
    GLP-1 group, 3 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Intra-abdominal fat content decreased in the GLP-1 group from baseline to 3 months (17,947±5804; 13,717±3628mm2, P=0.001, respectively), but was not significantly reduced in the control group (P=0.197) and at 3 months post-treatment, it was significantly lower in the GLP-1 group than control group (P=0.043).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, HbA1c did not differ significantly between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, HbA1c did not differ significantly between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeHbA1c versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c
    7.09%
    GLP-1 group, 3 months
    HbA1c
    7.42%
    control group, 3 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Glucose control, measured by HbA1c (GLP-1: 9.72±1.38; 7.09±0.60%, P<0.001, 9.46±1.25; 7.42±0.84%, P<0.001, respectively)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    significantly improved in both groups with no significant difference between them.
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, TNF-α decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, TNF-α decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTNF-α change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6, and leptin were lower and adiponectin levels higher in the GLP-1 group at 3 months compared with baseline (all P<0.05), but not significantly changed in the control group.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, IL-6 decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, IL-6 decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseIL-6 change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6, and leptin were lower and adiponectin levels higher in the GLP-1 group at 3 months compared with baseline (all P<0.05), but not significantly changed in the control group.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, LN(HOMA-IR) did not differ significantly between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance did not differ significantly between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeInsulin resistance versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.01 index (log scale)
    GLP-1 group, 3 months
    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.1 index (log scale)
    control group, 3 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and insulin resistance index LN(HOMA-IR) (GLP-1: 1.58±0.40; 1.01±0.33, P<0.001, Control: 1.53±0.57; 1.10±0.33, P=0.003, respectively) significantly improved in both groups with no significant difference between them.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, TNF-α was similar between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, TNF-α was similar with metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeTNF-α versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6 and leptin levels were similar between groups.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, IL-6 was similar between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, IL-6 was similar with metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeIL-6 versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6 and leptin levels were similar between groups.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, leptin was similar between metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, leptin was similar with metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    No significant changeLeptin versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6 and leptin levels were similar between groups.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, adiponectin was higher with metformin/exenatide than metformin/acarbose at 3 months.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, adiponectin was higher with metformin/exenatide than metformin/acarbose.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAdiponectin versus acarbose
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Metformin/acarbose
    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Adiponectin level was higher in the GLP-1 group than the control group at 3 months (P=0.025).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, leptin decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, leptin decreased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseLeptin change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6, and leptin were lower and adiponectin levels higher in the GLP-1 group at 3 months compared with baseline (all P<0.05), but not significantly changed in the control group.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, adiponectin increased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, adiponectin increased from baseline with metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAdiponectin change
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Immune and inflammation
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 monthsAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    TNF-α, IL-6, and leptin were lower and adiponectin levels higher in the GLP-1 group at 3 months compared with baseline (all P<0.05), but not significantly changed in the control group.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 13HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, HbA1c improved in both metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose groups.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, HbA1c improved in both treatment groups, including metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change in both groups
    Study

    n = 36

    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    HbA1c
    9.72%
    GLP-1 group, baseline
    HbA1c
    7.09%
    GLP-1 group, 3 months
    HbA1c
    9.46%
    control group, baseline
    HbA1c
    7.42%
    control group, 3 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Glucose control, measured by HbA1c (GLP-1: 9.72±1.38; 7.09±0.60%, P<0.001, 9.46±1.25; 7.42±0.84%, P<0.001, respectively)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    significantly improved in both groups with no significant difference between them.
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  2. 14HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, LN(HOMA-IR) improved in both metformin/exenatide and metformin/acarbose groups.

    In plain wordsIn patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance improved in both treatment groups, including metformin/exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseInsulin resistance change in both groups
    Study

    n = 36

    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.58 index (log scale)
    GLP-1 group, baseline
    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.01 index (log scale)
    GLP-1 group, 3 months
    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.53 index (log scale)
    control group, baseline
    LN(HOMA-IR)
    1.1 index (log scale)
    control group, 3 months

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and insulin resistance index LN(HOMA-IR) (GLP-1: 1.58±0.40; 1.01±0.33, P<0.001, Control: 1.53±0.57; 1.10±0.33, P=0.003, respectively) significantly improved in both groups with no significant difference between them.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    This randomized controlled trial included 36 patients with obesity and type-2 diabetes, who were metformin-unresponsive, receiving metformin/exenatide (GLP-1 group) or metformin/acarbose (control group) for 3 months.

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.