Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 300 · 2017

1 result

The Cost of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Versus the Cost of Pasireotide: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Ma LW, Dominguez-Rosado I, Gennarelli RL, Bach PB, Gonen M, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, Brennan MF, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ

Annals of surgery1 Jan 2017Cited by 53 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

1 result from studies that gave the peptide. 1 result from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialOther

    In pancreatic resection patients, mean cost was lower with pasireotide than placebo, without statistical significance (MP$22,800 versus MP$23,900, P = 0.571).

    In plain wordsIn pancreatic resection patients, mean cost was lower with pasireotide than placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTotal direct cost
    Study

    n = 300

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cost-effectiveness · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Mean total cost
    22,800 MP$
    pasireotide
    Mean total cost
    23,900 MP$
    placebo
    P value
    0.571
    pasireotide versus placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean cost was lower in the pasireotide (n = 152) group than the placebo (n = 148) group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (pasireotide, MP$22,800 vs placebo, MP$23,900: P = 0.571).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    An institutional modeling system was utilized to obtain total direct cost estimates from the 300 patients included in the trial.
    Summary · context
    Total direct costs were calculated from the index admission to 90 days after resection.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.