Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2016

1 result

Circulating adiponectin levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Results of a small, open-label, randomized controlled intervention trial in a subgroup receiving short-term exenatide.

Savvidou S, Karatzidou K, Tsakiri K, Gagalis A, Hytiroglou P, Goulis J

Diabetes research and clinical practice9 Jan 2016Cited by 26 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Exenatide (exendin-4) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, adiponectin increased in both the exenatide-plus-insulin and insulin-only groups, without an intervention-specific association.

    In plain wordsAdiponectin increased in both diabetes treatment groups, without a specific link to exenatide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAdiponectin increase in both groups
    Study

    n = 110

    Outcome group
    Inflammation markers · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Adiponectin change
    24.2%
    groups B and C
    Adiponectin change interquartile range
    14.8 to 53.2%
    groups B and C

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the subgroup intervention trial, adiponectin was significantly raised in both groups B and C (t-Student for paired samples, p=0.001) by Δ=+24.2% (interquartile range 14.8-53.2%).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    This elevation was not associated with the type of intervention but with weight loss, glycemic control and reduction of C-reactive protein (one-way ANCOVA).
    Summary · context
    A subgroup of patients (n=110), after assessed for eligibility criteria, was blindly randomized to receive either 6-month exenatide supplementation on glargine insulin (group B) or intense, self-regulated, insulin therapy alone (group C).

    In this study, Exenatide (exendin-4) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Exenatide (exendin-4).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.