Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 61 · 2016

1 result

COMPARISON OF THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF LIRAGLUTIDE AND GLIMEPIRIDE MONOTHERAPY ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.

Gilbert MP, Marre M, Holst JJ, Garber A, Baeres FM, Thomsen H, Pratley RE

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists17 Nov 2015Cited by 68 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

1 result from studies that gave the peptide. 1 result from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, total body BMD change from baseline at 52 or 104 weeks did not differ between liraglutide 1.2 or 1.8 mg/day and glimepiride 8 mg/day.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide did not change bone density differently from glimepiride over two years.

    Outcome
    No significant changeChange in total body BMD at 52 and 104 weeks
    Study

    n = 61

    Comparator
    Glimepiride 8 mg/day
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    1.2 and 1.8 mg/day · 104 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was no apparent difference in mean total BMD change from baseline in patients receiving liraglutide 1.8 or 1.2 mg/day or glimepiride 8 mg/day at 52 or 104 weeks.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    LEAD-3, a 52-week, double-blind, active-control, phase III, multicenter trial, investigated the efficacy of liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg/day) versus glimepiride monotherapy in type 2 diabetes.
    Summary · context
    Of these, 61 patients (20 assigned to liraglutide 1.8 mg/day, 23 to liraglutide 1.2 mg/day, 18 to glimepiride 8 mg/day) had BMD measurements.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

TerminatedPhase 3Results postedNCT00294723

To Evaluate the Effect of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride (Amaryl®) on Haemoglobin A1c

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 746Feb 2006 to Nov 2008

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.